calvin1984
Just a question regarding this problem.
I choose E because I decided that there's no concrete value indicating the hours. The values they give from both statements indicate relative values. Is this a good approach or did I just get lucky?
No that's not correct. We have two exactly the same linear equations from both statements, that's why we cannot solve for x and y. But if we had two
distinct linear equations then we would be able to solve.
For example if either of statement were:
the time needed for Machines X working alone to fill a production order of this size plus the time needed for Machines Y working alone to fill a production order of double the size is 10 hours --> x+2y=10.
So, for (1)+(2) we would have x+2y=10 and 2x=y --> x=2 and y=4 --> y-x=2.
Generally if you have n
distinct linear equations and n variables then you can solve for them. "
Distinct linear equations" means that no equation can be derived with the help of others or by arithmetic operation (multiplication, addition).
For example:
\(x+y=2\) and \(3x+3y=6\) --> we do have two linear equations and two variables but we cannot solve for \(x\) or \(y\) as the second equation is just the first one multiplied by 3 (basically we have only one distinct equation);
OR
\(x+y=1\), \(y+z=2\) and \(x+2y+z=3\) --> we have 3 linear equations and 3 variables but we cannot solve for \(x\), \(y\) or \(z\) as the third equation can be derived with the help of first two if we sum them (basically we have only two distinct equation).
Hope it's clear.