GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 18 Sep 2018, 20:22

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

"Marketing consultant: Last year I predicted that LRG's latest advert

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 07 Dec 2017
Posts: 278
"Marketing consultant: Last year I predicted that LRG's latest advert  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2018, 20:08
1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (01:19) correct 45% (01:40) wrong based on 133 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Marketing consultant: Last year I predicted that LRG's latest advertising campaign would be unpopular with customers and ineffective in promoting new products. But LRG ignored my predictions and took the advice of a competing consultant. This season's sales figures show that sales are down and LRG's new products are selling especially poorly. Thus, the advertising campaign was ill-conceived.

The marketing consultant's reasoning is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that

(A) it takes for granted that LRG's sales would not have been lower still in the absence of the competitor's advertising campaign

(B) it fails to consider that economic factors unrelated to the advertising campaign may have caused LRG's low sales figures

(C) it takes for granted that in LRG's industry, new products should outsell established products

(D) it takes for granted that the higher sales of established products are due to effective advertising

(E) it confuses a condition necessary for increasing product sales with a condition that will ensure increased sales

LSAT
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 07 Oct 2017
Posts: 273
Re: "Marketing consultant: Last year I predicted that LRG's latest advert  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2018, 20:42
AshutoshB wrote:
Marketing consultant: Last year I predicted that LRG's latest advertising campaign would be unpopular with customers and ineffective in promoting new products. But LRG ignored my predictions and took the advice of a competing consultant. This season's sales figures show that sales are down and LRG's new products are selling especially poorly. Thus, the advertising campaign was ill-conceived.

The marketing consultant's reasoning is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that

(A) it takes for granted that LRG's sales would not have been lower still in the absence of the competitor's advertising campaign

(B) it fails to consider that economic factors unrelated to the advertising campaign may have caused LRG's low sales figures

(C) it takes for granted that in LRG's industry, new products should outsell established products

(D) it takes for granted that the higher sales of established products are due to effective advertising

(E) it confuses a condition necessary for increasing product sales with a condition that will ensure increased sales

LSAT
Will go for B

It is a casual argument.

AD campaign - - - - > poor sales.

Author assume that just because 2 things exist together, one thing led to other. He assumes that their is no alternate cause of the effect.

B hits the nail on the head.

A--> if this were true, campaign would have been treated positive and not negative.

C---> no such comparison

D--->no such assumption is made

E----> This is not conditional statement. This is casual argument

Thank you = Kudos
_________________

Thank you =Kudos
The best thing in life lies on the other side of the pain.

Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 541
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: "Marketing consultant: Last year I predicted that LRG's latest advert  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2018, 22:49
AshutoshB wrote:
Marketing consultant: Last year I predicted that LRG's latest advertising campaign would be unpopular with customers and ineffective in promoting new products. But LRG ignored my predictions and took the advice of a competing consultant. This season's sales figures show that sales are down and LRG's new products are selling especially poorly. Thus, the advertising campaign was ill-conceived.

The marketing consultant's reasoning is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that

(A) it takes for granted that LRG's sales would not have been lower still in the absence of the competitor's advertising campaign

(B) it fails to consider that economic factors unrelated to the advertising campaign may have caused LRG's low sales figures

(C) it takes for granted that in LRG's industry, new products should outsell established products

(D) it takes for granted that the higher sales of established products are due to effective advertising

(E) it confuses a condition necessary for increasing product sales with a condition that will ensure increased sales

LSAT

Can someone elaborate on A, B and E.
All these seem valid to me. Any help is appreciated.
Thanks.
_________________

------------------------------
"Trust the timing of your life"
Hit Kudus if this has helped you get closer to your goal, and also to assist others save time. Tq :)

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 07 Dec 2017
Posts: 278
"Marketing consultant: Last year I predicted that LRG's latest advert  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Aug 2018, 00:06
TaN1213 wrote:
AshutoshB wrote:
Marketing consultant: Last year I predicted that LRG's latest advertising campaign would be unpopular with customers and ineffective in promoting new products. But LRG ignored my predictions and took the advice of a competing consultant. This season's sales figures show that sales are down and LRG's new products are selling especially poorly. Thus, the advertising campaign was ill-conceived.

The marketing consultant's reasoning is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that

(A) it takes for granted that LRG's sales would not have been lower still in the absence of the competitor's advertising campaign

(B) it fails to consider that economic factors unrelated to the advertising campaign may have caused LRG's low sales figures

(C) it takes for granted that in LRG's industry, new products should outsell established products

(D) it takes for granted that the higher sales of established products are due to effective advertising

(E) it confuses a condition necessary for increasing product sales with a condition that will ensure increased sales

LSAT

Can someone elaborate on A, B and E.
All these seem valid to me. Any help is appreciated.
Thanks.

HI I m no expert, A is Wrong as it talks about "competitor's advertising campaign" there is only one advertisement claim, though there is Competing consultant but there is no competitors claim

E is wrong: there is no causal relation
Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 541
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: "Marketing consultant: Last year I predicted that LRG's latest advert  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Sep 2018, 09:33
Hello Expert,

Would you please assist in my query posted in the discussion?
Thank you.
_________________

------------------------------
"Trust the timing of your life"
Hit Kudus if this has helped you get closer to your goal, and also to assist others save time. Tq :)

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 17 Aug 2016
Posts: 15
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: "Marketing consultant: Last year I predicted that LRG's latest advert  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Sep 2018, 23:50
sumit411 wrote:
AshutoshB wrote:
Marketing consultant: Last year I predicted that LRG's latest advertising campaign would be unpopular with customers and ineffective in promoting new products. But LRG ignored my predictions and took the advice of a competing consultant. This season's sales figures show that sales are down and LRG's new products are selling especially poorly. Thus, the advertising campaign was ill-conceived.

The marketing consultant's reasoning is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that

(A) it takes for granted that LRG's sales would not have been lower still in the absence of the competitor's advertising campaign

(B) it fails to consider that economic factors unrelated to the advertising campaign may have caused LRG's low sales figures

(C) it takes for granted that in LRG's industry, new products should outsell established products

(D) it takes for granted that the higher sales of established products are due to effective advertising

(E) it confuses a condition necessary for increasing product sales with a condition that will ensure increased sales

LSAT
Will go for B

It is a casual argument.

AD campaign - - - - > poor sales.

Author assume that just because 2 things exist together, one thing led to other. He assumes that their is no alternate cause of the effect.

B hits the nail on the head.

A--> if this were true, campaign would have been treated positive and not negative.

C---> no such comparison

D--->no such assumption is made

E----> This is not conditional statement. This is casual argument

Thank you = Kudos


Can you please elaborate on why (D) is wrong?
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 03 Apr 2018
Posts: 35
Reviews Badge
Re: "Marketing consultant: Last year I predicted that LRG's latest advert  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Sep 2018, 15:08
How do I get more LSAT material ?
Re: "Marketing consultant: Last year I predicted that LRG's latest advert &nbs [#permalink] 05 Sep 2018, 15:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by

"Marketing consultant: Last year I predicted that LRG's latest advert

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.