Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Mary persuaded n friends to donate $500 each to her election [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Apr 2009, 15:51

8

This post received KUDOS

54

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

63% (01:33) correct
37% (01:32) wrong based on 1727 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Mary persuaded n friends to donate $500 each to her election campaign, and then each of these n friends persuaded n more people to donate $500 each to Mary’s campaign. If no one donated more than once and if there were no other donations, what was the value of n?

(1) The first n people donated 1/16 of the total amount donated. (2) The total amount donated was $120,000.

Mary persuaded n friends to donate $500 each to her election campaign, and then each of these n friends persuaded n more people to donate $500 each to Mary's campaign. If no one donated more than once and if there were no other donations, what was the value of n?

# of people donated at the firs stage - \(n\), amount - \(500n\); # of people donated at the second - \(n^2\), amount - \(500n^2\); Total amount donated - \(500n+500n^2\) Little assumption here: \(n>0\).

(1) The first n people donated 1/16 of the total amount donated --> \(16(500n)=500n+500n^2\) --> \(n=15\). Sufficient.

(2) The total amount donated was $120,000 --> \(500n+500n^2=120,000\) --> \(n=15\). Sufficient.

I have understood the approach GT took to solve the problem its very similar to mine... but i cannot make out how can the first stmt give a solution for n as 0 or a -ve value.

I have understood the approach GT took to solve the problem its very similar to mine... but i cannot make out how can the first stmt give a solution for n as 0 or a -ve value.

Could someone explain this?

It cannot give negative solution for \(n\), though it can give \(n=0\) as a solution. See below:

Mary persuaded n friends to donate $500 each to her election campaign, and then each of these n friends persuaded n more people to donate $500 each to Mary's campaign. If no one donated more than once and if there were no other donations, what was the value of n?

# of people donated at the firs stage - \(n\), amount donated - \(500n\); # of people donated at the second - \(n^2\), amount donated - \(500n^2\); Total amount donated - \(500n+500n^2\) Little assumption here: \(n>0\).

(1) The first n people donated 1/16 of the total amount donated --> \(500n=\frac{1}{16}(500n+500n^2)\) --> \(n=15\) (we can rule out \(n=0\), which is also a solution of this equation). Sufficient.

(2) The total amount donated was $120,000 --> \(500n+500n^2=120,000\) --> \(n=15\). Sufficient.

Mary persuaded n friends to donate $500 each to her election campaign, and then each of these n friends persuaded n more people to donate $500 each to Mary’s campaign. If no one donated more than once and if there were no other donations, what was the value of n? (1) The first n people donated 1/16 of the total amount donated. (2) The total amount donated was $120,000.

Susie can buy apples from two stores: a supermarket that sells apples only in bundles of 4, and a convenience store that sells single, unbundled apples. If Susie wants to ensure that the total number of apples she buys is a multiple of 5, what is the minimum number of apples she must buy from the convenience store?

A. 0 B. 1 C. 2 D. 3 E. 4

********************************

If Susie can buy '0' apples, why can't Mary persuade '0' friends? Absurd!!!
_________________

Re: Mary persuaded n friends to donate $500 each to her election [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Mar 2012, 22:54

2

This post received KUDOS

Man this question makes me mad that i got it wrong initially and it took me a while to figure it out..

OK so (1)

n/(n + n^2) = 1/16 16n = n^2 + n n^2 -15n = 0 n(n-15) = 0 But n cant really be zero Sufficient

(2) (n + n ^2)* 500 = 120,000 n + n^2 = 240 n^2 + n -240=0 (n +16) (n-15) = 0 But n cant really be -16 Sufficient

Answer is D

I couldnt figure out the way to factor n^2 +n -240 = 0 for a long time I guess my real issue was trying to solve it.. once i constructed the quadratic i shouldve just moved on with life!!!

Mary persuaded n friends to donate $500 each to her election campaign, and then each of these n friends persuaded n more people to donate $500 each to Mary’s campaign. If no one donated more than once and if there were no other donations, what was the value of n? (1) The first n people donated 1/16 of the total amount donated. (2) The total amount donated was $120,000.

Susie can buy apples from two stores: a supermarket that sells apples only in bundles of 4, and a convenience store that sells single, unbundled apples. If Susie wants to ensure that the total number of apples she buys is a multiple of 5, what is the minimum number of apples she must buy from the convenience store?

A. 0 B. 1 C. 2 D. 3 E. 4

********************************

If Susie can buy '0' apples, why can't Mary persuade '0' friends? Absurd!!!

Can someone please answer the above mentioned fluke's query ? I have the same confusion "If Susie can buy '0' apples, why can't Mary persuade '0' friends?" In that case, Condition I will not be sufficient.

I have understood the approach GT took to solve the problem its very similar to mine... but i cannot make out how can the first stmt give a solution for n as 0 or a -ve value.

Could someone explain this?

It can not give negative solution for \(n\), though it can give \(n=0\) as a solution. See below:

Mary persuaded n friends to donate $500 each to her election campaign, and then each of these n friends persuaded n more people to donate $500 each to Mary's campaign. If no one donated more than once and if there were no other donations, what was the value of n?

# of people donated at the firs stage - \(n\), amount donated - \(500n\); # of people donated at the second - \(n^2\), amount donated - \(500n^2\); Total amount donated - \(500n+500n^2\) Little assumption here: \(n>0\).

(1) The first n people donated 1/16 of the total amount donated --> \(500n=\frac{1}{16}(500n+500n^2)\) --> \(n=15\) (we can rule out \(n=0\), which is also a solution of this equation). Sufficient.

(2) The total amount donated was $120,000 --> \(500n+500n^2=120,000\) --> \(n=15\). Sufficient.

Answer: D.

Hope it's clear.

How to solve equation like 500n^2 + 500n = 120,000

This translates to quadratic equation n^2 + n = 240

I have understood the approach GT took to solve the problem its very similar to mine... but i cannot make out how can the first stmt give a solution for n as 0 or a -ve value.

Could someone explain this?

It can not give negative solution for \(n\), though it can give \(n=0\) as a solution. See below:

Mary persuaded n friends to donate $500 each to her election campaign, and then each of these n friends persuaded n more people to donate $500 each to Mary's campaign. If no one donated more than once and if there were no other donations, what was the value of n?

# of people donated at the firs stage - \(n\), amount donated - \(500n\); # of people donated at the second - \(n^2\), amount donated - \(500n^2\); Total amount donated - \(500n+500n^2\) Little assumption here: \(n>0\).

(1) The first n people donated 1/16 of the total amount donated --> \(500n=\frac{1}{16}(500n+500n^2)\) --> \(n=15\) (we can rule out \(n=0\), which is also a solution of this equation). Sufficient.

(2) The total amount donated was $120,000 --> \(500n+500n^2=120,000\) --> \(n=15\). Sufficient.

Answer: D.

Hope it's clear.

How to solve equation like 500n^2 + 500n = 120,000

This translates to quadratic equation n^2 + n = 240

Should one use formula of \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}

You can solve it using the formula for quadratics, though it's better to use another approach:

\(500n+500n^2=120,000\) --> \(n+n^2=240\) --> \(n(n+1)=240\). Since \(n\) is an integer then we have that the product of two consecutive integers is 240, now it's easy to find that \(n=15\).

Re: Mary persuaded n friends to donate $500 each to her election [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Aug 2013, 18:49

I am just wondering if there is another way to solve this problem without the quadratics solution. Fundraising run 1 = 500n Fundraising run 2 = 500n^2

500n + 500n^2 = total amount donated.

Goal of our DS question, find n, and to find "n", we need to know: 1) Total amount donated OR 2) The RATIO of the two fundraising runs. If we have the ratio, we can set them against each other and get rid of "n"s.

Each given statement meets the criteria above, thus D.

Re: Mary persuaded n friends to donate $500 each to her election [#permalink]

Show Tags

10 Jan 2014, 09:08

seofah wrote:

Mary persuaded n friends to donate $500 each to her election campaign, and then each of these n friends persuaded n more people to donate $500 each to Mary’s campaign. If no one donated more than once and if there were no other donations, what was the value of n?

(1) The first n people donated 1/16 of the total amount donated. (2) The total amount donated was $120,000.

My problem with this question was that I foolishly assumed that there were two different n's, n1 and n2, and thus we had two variables (n1,n2) plus the total amount donated.

1 gave us the relation between n1,n2 and 2 gives us total donated so we can solve for the unknowns, that's why I picked C.

It just simply couldnt comprehend how we could get n^2, hopefully I will not make the same mistake on the actual test in a couple of days.

Mary persuaded n friends to donate $500 each to her election [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Aug 2014, 18:49

Bunuel wrote:

unceldolan wrote:

Hey all,

I think I don't get the wording: If EACH of the n friends persuaded n people, wouldn't it be n^n??

Wouldn't really change the outcome, but I'd like to know it exactly....

Thanks!

No. Say n=3, then at the second stage the number of people who donated would be 3*3=9, not 3^3=27:

Attachment:

Untitled.png

Hope it's clear.

Not the OP but I was stuck at the same point -- I didn't know how to go a level after N. I started plugging in numbers but that turned out to be a huge mess.

Couple of questions:

1) I couldn't really understand (while first reading the question) as to when n would stop factoring. Meaning, if n was 3, would it go own 2 levels or 3 levels? meaning, would the total be 500(n + n^2 + n3)

2) a little confused as to why it's not 3n^2? sorry, having a hard time visualizing the total number of people.

3) would the third level be cubed like i wrote above or would it be n^4(squared of n^2?)

Re: Mary persuaded n friends to donate $500 each to her election [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Nov 2014, 08:34

Can someone please explain the logic in putting the equation in part (1) = 500n? In my own working i came up with the RHS, but in my mind that should be put equal to the total amount donated. I am not sure how this is equal to 500n (which in turn is equal to the total number of 1st tier friends who donated). I am sure its simple and I am just missing a logical step. The rest of Brunels/OG's solution is crystal clear.

Can someone please explain the logic in putting the equation in part (1) = 500n? In my own working i came up with the RHS, but in my mind that should be put equal to the total amount donated. I am not sure how this is equal to 500n (which in turn is equal to the total number of 1st tier friends who donated). I am sure its simple and I am just missing a logical step. The rest of Brunels/OG's solution is crystal clear.

Amount donated by the first n people = \(500n\); Total amount donated = \(500n+500n^2\).

(1) says that the first n people donated 1/16 of the total amount donated, thus \(500n=\frac{1}{16}(500n+500n^2)\) --> \(16(500n)=500n+500n^2\).