8.toastcrunch
(except for) is idiom then why options A and D are wrong?
(A) is missing a conjunction, and that makes it a run-on sentence.
As for (D), "excepting for" seems a bit redundant. Why not use "except for" or just "excepting" instead?
That's not a terribly convincing argument against (D), so let's look at "except for" vs "except in":
- "Tim ate everything on his plate, except for the vegetables."
This one works because the vegetables are a subset of what's on Tim's plate. So Tim ate
all of the stuff (everything on his plate) except for
some portion or subset of the stuff (the vegetables).
- "The English language was never really spoken on the island, except for the domains of administration and teaching."
This is basically what we get in choice (D). Notice that the part in bold isn't a subset of something else referenced earlier in the sentence.
- "The English language was never really spoken on the island, except in the domains of administration and teaching."
This is basically what we get in choice (C), and it works because
in the domains {...} further clarifies
where the language was and was not spoken. English was spoken in those domains, but not really anywhere else.
In this question, we aren't trying to exclude a specific part of a larger whole. Instead, we're trying to exclude a place (i.e., a domain or sphere of activity). Since we're trying to clarify
where the language was and was not spoken, "in" ("except
in") is more appropriate than "for" ("except
for").
That's admittedly a pretty tricky point. There are much bigger fish to fry on the GMAT, so don't worry too much if this one has you scratching your head!