Last visit was: 12 Jul 2024, 21:08 It is currently 12 Jul 2024, 21:08
Toolkit
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

# ­Medical ethicist: Medical schools should not allow their students to

SORT BY:
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Manager
Joined: 16 Jan 2023
Posts: 106
Own Kudos [?]: 110 [11]
Given Kudos: 82
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Accounting
GMAT Focus 1:
655 Q85 V81 DI82 (Online)
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
VP
Joined: 29 Oct 2015
Posts: 1047
Own Kudos [?]: 396 [0]
Given Kudos: 647
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
VP
Joined: 03 Jul 2022
Posts: 1227
Own Kudos [?]: 839 [0]
Given Kudos: 21
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Manager
Joined: 13 Dec 2023
Status:Applying in R1 of 2024 to t15
Affiliations: University of Tennessee
Posts: 133
Own Kudos [?]: 206 [2]
Given Kudos: 47
Location: United States (CO)
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT Focus 1:
605 Q76 V84 DI80
GMAT Focus 2:
615 Q78 V86 DI78
GPA: 3.62
WE:Analyst (Consumer Products)
Re: ­Medical ethicist: Medical schools should not allow their students to [#permalink]
2
Kudos
It can't be C. That is an inference based off of the passage.

This problem asks us to restate the conclusion of the passage. This means that the answer choice must only contain explicitly mentioned information in the passage. There cannot be inferences or any assumptions. You just have to restate the exact same conclusion from the passage in different words and that is your answer choice.

If you correctly identified the conclusion in the passage, you would see that the first sentence of the passage is actually the conclusion. If you have trouble seeing that, the reason is that it gives the "call to arms" or what should be done given the information provided. This makes it the conclusion.

So your job now is to find the answer choice that simply restates in different words this sentence:

"Medical schools should not allow their students to accept even minor gifts from pharmaceutical companies."

option A is pretty darn close. "No medical school should allow its students to accept even minor gifts from pharmaceutical companies."

To get this one right you have to be able to properly identify the conclusion in the passage. If you had trouble doing that, you may have a deficiency. Regardless of the question type you should always know the conclusion of the passage before moving on to the answer choices.­
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 15105
Own Kudos [?]: 66592 [3]
Given Kudos: 436
Location: Pune, India
Re: ­Medical ethicist: Medical schools should not allow their students to [#permalink]
3
Kudos

sayan640 wrote:
Is not option A too extreme ? KarishmaB GMATNinja

Posted from my mobile device

What is the conclusion of an argument - the opinion of the author. It is what he wants to tell you, wants to say and that is why he wrote the argument.
If you break down the given argument, what would you say is the conclusion? It will be the first sentence:

Medical schools should not allow their students to accept even minor gifts from pharmaceutical companies.
means
All medical schools should not allow their students to ...

We cannot eliminate an option based on "too extreme." If the author has given an extreme conclusion, you need to identify it as such.

A. No medical school should allow its students to accept even minor gifts from pharmaceutical companies.

Exactly what the author concludes. Hence it has to be the answer.

­
Intern
Joined: 16 Feb 2024
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Location: United States
Re: ­Medical ethicist: Medical schools should not allow their students to [#permalink]
1
Kudos
I had to choose between A and D. Looks like A is an intermediary conclusion. D could have been the main conclusion if it had explicitely mentioned the inappropriate influence. Since it was vague and not saying that "prescription choices that are not in patients' best interests." I went with A
VP
Joined: 29 Oct 2015
Posts: 1047
Own Kudos [?]: 396 [0]
Given Kudos: 647
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Re: ­Medical ethicist: Medical schools should not allow their students to [#permalink]
MartyMurray Would you like to explain this question ?

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Joined: 26 Mar 2017
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 87
­Medical ethicist: Medical schools should not allow their students to [#permalink]
The answer B and answer especially C contain the word "Certain" which might be the reason that these answer choices are wrong.

The word certain here implies that for some pharmaceutical companies the gifts might be not okay, but for some other the gift might be okay.­
Tutor
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 1020
Own Kudos [?]: 2000 [0]
Given Kudos: 88
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Re: ­Medical ethicist: Medical schools should not allow their students to [#permalink]
­Medical ethicist: Medical schools should not allow their students to accept even minor gifts from pharmaceutical companies. When psychological resesarchers gave medical students small promotional gifts with a drug brand logo, those students' favourable attitude toward the brand increased. This shows that such gifts can bias students toward certain brands. In their future careers as doctors, this could lead them to make prescription choices that are not in patients' best interests.

Which of the following could most accurately express the main conclusion of the medical ethicist's argument?

In an argument, the main conclusion is the final conclusion that is supported by everything else in the argument. So, to find the correct answer to this question, we have to analyze the argument to see what conclusion is supported by everything else.

A. No medical school should allow its students to accept even minor gifts from pharmaceutical companies.

This choice says in a slightly different way the same thing the first sentence of the passage says. So, lets see whether the first sentence states the main conclusion by analyzing the structure of the argument.

­Medical schools should not allow their students to accept even minor gifts from pharmaceutical companies.

This first statement of the argument could be the main conclusion if it's supported by all the other statements.

When psychological resesarchers gave medical students small promotional gifts with a drug brand logo, those students' favourable attitude toward the brand increased.

This is simply stated as fact and is not supported by any other statement in the passage. So, it can't be the main conclusion.

This shows that such gifts can bias students toward certain brands.

"This shows that" means "this supports the conclusion that." So, "such gifts can bias students toward certain brands," is a conclusion supported by the previous statement.

However, it's not the main conclusion since, as we'll see, it helps to support the first statement in the passage. So, it's not the final conclusion.

In their future careers as doctors, this could lead them to make prescription choices that are not in patients' best interests.

Notice that, while this statement is related to the previous statement, it's not supported by the previous statement. Rather, this statement expresses an opinion of the medical ethicist's for which no support is provided. So, this statement cannot be the main conclusion.

Meanwhile, this statement supports the first statement of the passage. After all, the fact that gifts biasing students toward certain brands could lead them to make prescription choices that are not in patients' best interests logically supports the conclusion that "­Medical schools should not allow their students to accept even minor gifts from pharmaceutical companies."

So, we see that the first sentence of the passage states the main conclusion. Thus, since this choice says the same thing the first sentence of the passage says, this choice accurately expresses the main conclusion of the medical ethicist's argument.

Keep.

B. Even minor gifts from pharmaceutical companies bias medical students toward certain pharmaceutical brands.

"Minor gifts" in this choice means the same thing as "small promotional gifts" in the argument. So, since "such gifts" in the argument refers to "small promotional gifts, "this choice means basically the same thing as "such gifts can bias students toward certain brands," in the argument.

As we saw in our analysis of the argument for choice (A), "such gifts can bias students toward certain brands," is a conclusion supported by another statement in the passage.

At the same time, we also saw that ""such gifts can bias students toward certain brands," is not the main conclusion since it in turn helps to support the first statement in the passage.

So, this choice does not express the main conclusion.

Eliminate.

C. A bias toward certain pharmaceutical brands could lead doctors to make prescription choices that are not in patients' best interests.

As we saw in our analysis of choice (A), the final statement of the argument, which expresses basically what this choice expresses, is not a supported conclusion. Rather, it's an unsupported opinion of the medical ethicist's that supports the first statement of the passage.

Eliminate.

D. Gifts from pharmaceutical companies to medical students inappropriately influence those students in their future careers as doctors.

Notice that the argument is about what experimental results indicate. They indicate that "gifts can bias students" and that "this could lead them to make prescription choices that are not in patients' best interests."

So, the argument is about what "can" and "could" occur. It's not about what actually occurs presently, as in, the argument does not indicate that, as this choice says, gifts from pharmaceutical companies do in fact influence students.

So, this choice is not the main conclusion of the argument since this choice is not supported by the statements in the argument.

Eliminate.

E. Research found that small promotional gifts with a drug brand logo increased medical students' favourable attitude toward that brand.

As we saw in our analysis of the argument for choice (A), the fact that "When psychological resesarchers gave medical students small promotional gifts with a drug brand logo, those students' favourable attitude toward the brand increased," is not a conclusion of the argument. Rather, it provides support for a conclusion that in turn supports the main conclusion.

Eliminate.