Last visit was: 20 Sep 2026, 22:51 It is currently 20 Sep 2026, 22:51
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Narenn
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 22 Feb 2012
Last visit: 20 Sep 2026
Posts: 9,375
Own Kudos:
11,516
 [36]
Given Kudos: 4,908
Affiliations: GMAT Club
Test: Test
Posts: 9,375
Kudos: 11,516
 [36]
15
Kudos
Add Kudos
21
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
TheIvyLeagueEdge
User avatar
Admission Consultant
Joined: 13 Jul 2016
Last visit: 19 Sep 2026
Posts: 730
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 173
Status:Application Consultant
Affiliations: TheIvyLeagueEdge
Location: India
TheIvyLeagueEdge: Bala
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
Schools: Yale (A)
GMAT 1: 740 Q47 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE:Operations (Other)
Schools: Yale (A)
GMAT 1: 740 Q47 V44
Posts: 730
Kudos: 172
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Napier
Joined: 04 Jan 2026
Last visit: 20 Sep 2026
Posts: 9
Given Kudos: 2
Location: India
GPA: 3.2
Posts: 9
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
percyboi66
Joined: 02 Feb 2026
Last visit: 20 Sep 2026
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V85 DI82 (Online)
GPA: 6.3
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V85 DI82 (Online)
Posts: 21
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

I'm an Indian 22M, currently a data analyst at S&P Global working with data research in M&A deals. I've got a little over a year of work experience (~15 months) at my current role. I've got a couple of awards within my team for leadership, performance, as well as side projects involving single-handedly building AI tools for my team. I plan to use this in my SOP to help the professional case.

I'm aiming for a career in M&A advisory at a European desk with the future goal of transitioning into corp development in the automotive/mobility sector. I'm looking at HEC's MiF and LSE's MSc Finance as the obvious programmes for me with both schools' MiMs with finance specializations as backups.

However what I'm concerned with is that my undergrad GPA (BA Economics Honours at a university considered tier 1 by almost every big name business school) was hurt pretty bad with some serious troubles at home. I've only got a 6.3/10 with a First Class division during my undergrad.

I've tried to make up for that with a GMAT FE score of 695 (Q87, V85, D82). I've also got an 8.5 band on the IELTS (equivalent to a C2 English certification).

3 months at a business analyst internship at a Fortune 500 international property management MNC conducting competitive mapping and research exercises.

23 months heading the largest student news media organization in the country during my undergraduate.

Also ranked 3rd from 800 teams across the country in a management consultancy case study competition during my undergrad.

If it matters, I had a 95% grade in 12th, with a 99% in math.

Obviously the MiF would be the ideal programme given my career goals. I am however, concerned about the GPA problem. Would the GMAT, an academic and professional reference (latter being a strong point i think in my application), and a good personal statement be enough to balance out the GPA?

Should I switch my primary focus to the MiM? Is that more attainable for my profile?

Thanks for your advice!
User avatar
TheIvyLeagueEdge
User avatar
Admission Consultant
Joined: 13 Jul 2016
Last visit: 19 Sep 2026
Posts: 730
Own Kudos:
172
 [1]
Given Kudos: 173
Status:Application Consultant
Affiliations: TheIvyLeagueEdge
Location: India
TheIvyLeagueEdge: Bala
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
Schools: Yale (A)
GMAT 1: 740 Q47 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE:Operations (Other)
Schools: Yale (A)
GMAT 1: 740 Q47 V44
Posts: 730
Kudos: 172
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hey percyboi66
Great profile.
Your CGPA is low; Given however that you were dealing with "serious challenges" at home, it is important to address the part appropriately, WITHOUT trying to justify anything. What works in your favour, will lend credibility to your story of challenges AND will also help you offset some of the damage from the low CGPA is that you have been able to prove your case with a high GMAT, and with a good performance in other academic spots.

Should you switch to MiM because of the low CGPA? Absolutely NOT.
The only reason to switch to MiM should be if you see your future professional impact being better in a management team based scenario than as an Individual Contributor with a proven expertise in finance.

Hope that helps. For a Free Assessment over a 1:1 call, please submit your profile https://theivyleagueedge.com/index.php/contactus/
_________________
Bala, Yale SOM Alum

1. WORLD'S MOST recommended Admissions Consultant on Linkedin
https://www.linkedin.com/in/balkrishna/
2. 100% 5-Star Reviews on PoetsandQuants
Poetsandquants(dot)com/consultant/bala-bal-krishna-shukla/

Why us?
** Single point of contact: Your consultant is a Yale SOM alum, with the HIGHEST number of recommendations GLOBALLY
** Insider knowledge (from serving and ex-AdComs from top schools)
** Unlimited support for 1-to-1 MBA admissions consulting.

percyboi66
Hi,

I'm an Indian 22M, currently a data analyst at S&P Global working with data research in M&A deals. I've got a little over a year of work experience (~15 months) at my current role. I've got a couple of awards within my team for leadership, performance, as well as side projects involving single-handedly building AI tools for my team. I plan to use this in my SOP to help the professional case.

I'm aiming for a career in M&A advisory at a European desk with the future goal of transitioning into corp development in the automotive/mobility sector. I'm looking at HEC's MiF and LSE's MSc Finance as the obvious programmes for me with both schools' MiMs with finance specializations as backups.

However what I'm concerned with is that my undergrad GPA (BA Economics Honours at a university considered tier 1 by almost every big name business school) was hurt pretty bad with some serious troubles at home. I've only got a 6.3/10 with a First Class division during my undergrad.

I've tried to make up for that with a GMAT FE score of 695 (Q87, V85, D82). I've also got an 8.5 band on the IELTS (equivalent to a C2 English certification).

3 months at a business analyst internship at a Fortune 500 international property management MNC conducting competitive mapping and research exercises.

23 months heading the largest student news media organization in the country during my undergraduate.

Also ranked 3rd from 800 teams across the country in a management consultancy case study competition during my undergrad.

If it matters, I had a 95% grade in 12th, with a 99% in math.

Obviously the MiF would be the ideal programme given my career goals. I am however, concerned about the GPA problem. Would the GMAT, an academic and professional reference (latter being a strong point i think in my application), and a good personal statement be enough to balance out the GPA?

Should I switch my primary focus to the MiM? Is that more attainable for my profile?

Thanks for your advice!
User avatar
percyboi66
Joined: 02 Feb 2026
Last visit: 20 Sep 2026
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V85 DI82 (Online)
GPA: 6.3
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V85 DI82 (Online)
Posts: 21
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks for your reply, could i therefore (while addressing the challenges) have a good case for the MiF at HEC/MSc Finance at LSE? Thanks!
TheIvyLeagueEdge
Hey percyboi66
Great profile.
Your CGPA is low; Given however that you were dealing with "serious challenges" at home, it is important to address the part appropriately, WITHOUT trying to justify anything. What works in your favour, will lend credibility to your story of challenges AND will also help you offset some of the damage from the low CGPA is that you have been able to prove your case with a high GMAT, and with a good performance in other academic spots.

Should you switch to MiM because of the low CGPA? Absolutely NOT.
The only reason to switch to MiM should be if you see your future professional impact being better in a management team based scenario than as an Individual Contributor with a proven expertise in finance.

Hope that helps. For a Free Assessment over a 1:1 call, please submit your profile https://theivyleagueedge.com/index.php/contactus/
_________________
Bala, Yale SOM Alum

1. WORLD'S MOST recommended Admissions Consultant on Linkedin
https://www.linkedin.com/in/balkrishna/
2. 100% 5-Star Reviews on PoetsandQuants
Poetsandquants(dot)com/consultant/bala-bal-krishna-shukla/

Why us?
** Single point of contact: Your consultant is a Yale SOM alum, with the HIGHEST number of recommendations GLOBALLY
** Insider knowledge (from serving and ex-AdComs from top schools)
** Unlimited support for 1-to-1 MBA admissions consulting.


User avatar
TheIvyLeagueEdge
User avatar
Admission Consultant
Joined: 13 Jul 2016
Last visit: 19 Sep 2026
Posts: 730
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 173
Status:Application Consultant
Affiliations: TheIvyLeagueEdge
Location: India
TheIvyLeagueEdge: Bala
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
Schools: Yale (A)
GMAT 1: 740 Q47 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE:Operations (Other)
Schools: Yale (A)
GMAT 1: 740 Q47 V44
Posts: 730
Kudos: 172
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yes, of course.
Do remember however, your SOP needs to capture things already talked about well, subtly, and yet interestingly...
percyboi66
Thanks for your reply, could i therefore (while addressing the challenges) have a good case for the MiF at HEC/MSc Finance at LSE? Thanks!

User avatar
minusaccusamus
Joined: 13 Nov 2025
Last visit: 20 Sep 2026
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 8
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Profile Evaluation 2027 Intake
Hi everyone,
I would really appreciate some honest advice on my profile and application strategy for the 2027 intake, particularly on whether I should continue targeting top Masters in Finance or broaden my applications towards MiMs.

Undergraduate: ESCP Business School Bachelor in Management graduated 2026

GPA: 3.7/4.0 (~15.4/20, around top quartile overall)

GMAT:
575
This is currently one of my main concerns.
I scored 575 on the GMAT Focus after several months of preparation. My preparation was somewhat inconsistent because of university/internships, although there were also periods where I studied intensively every day. Poor time management is also responsible for many lost points.
Given the amount of time already invested and the level of the schools I am targeting, I am questioning whether continuing with the GMAT makes sense or whether I should switch to the GRE and see if the format suits me better.
I would particularly appreciate opinions on:
  • How damaging is a 575 for my target MiFs/MiMs given the rest of my academic record?
  • What GMAT score would make my profile genuinely competitive?
  • Would switching to GRE make sense at this stage?
  • What GRE score should I target for LBS/LSE/INSEAD-level programmes?
Career Goal
My target is Investment Banking / Transaction Services, ideally in London or another major European financial centre, potentially moving towards PE longer term.

What happened with my 2026 applications :
I initially planned to apply to around 6–7 programmes top finance programs (LBS, LSE, HEC...) unfortunately, the application cycle went very badly from an execution standpoint.

The biggest issues were not feeling ready for gmat and delaying until near final round deadline, and academic references. Several programmes required two academic referees. Although professors initially agreed to support me, actually obtaining the recommendations before the deadlines became extremely difficult.

In the end, LBS MFA was the only application I managed to submit completely. I applied relatively late in the cycle and did not even receive a rejection email.
So I don't think my 2026 results really tell me whether my profile was competitive for the broader school list, since most applications were never submitted.
Main question: MiF or MiM for 2027?
This experience has made me reconsider whether I should apply almost exclusively to specialised Finance Masters again.
For 2027, I am considering LBS MiM, HEC MiM, INSEAD MiM but still apply for my ideal program being LSE MSc Finance.
I would really appreciate opinions on the following:

  1. Does my overall profile look more competitive for top MiMs or top MiFs?
  2. Does my relatively broad profile (broad international exposure, speak fluently 4 languages, intenrship experience, extracurricular leadership) fit MiM admissions better than highly specialised MiF admissions?
  3. Are top MiMs actually less competitive for my profile, or would I simply be replacing MiFs with equally competitive programs?
  4. How significant is my 575 GMAT score as a weakness? Should improving it be my absolute priority before applying?
  5. Given several months of GMAT preparation already, would you continue with GMAT or test the GRE instead?
For 2027 I intend to apply much earlier, try my best to find and secure my referees well in advance, and avoid repeating the execution problems of my previous cycle.

Any candid feedback is welcome, I am aware that my target programs may be too high but I feel like in today's market only top schools with distinguished network can make me stand up among other profiles.
User avatar
tiredengineer
Joined: 24 Jun 2026
Last visit: 19 Sep 2026
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q79 V85 DI84
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q79 V85 DI84
Posts: 8
Kudos: 3
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dealing with a similar issue, spent months studying the GMAT, scored relatively well in the official mocks (645-655), and ended up getting a very small number of mistakes on the actual exam (way less mistakes than the mock) yet ended up with a 595,

Obviously don't think that will be nearly as competitive as any other candidate so decided to switch to the GRE, will take the GRE tomorrow and let you know if its worth switching lol.

Best of luck.

minusaccusamus
Profile Evaluation 2027 Intake
Hi everyone,
I would really appreciate some honest advice on my profile and application strategy for the 2027 intake, particularly on whether I should continue targeting top Masters in Finance or broaden my applications towards MiMs.

Undergraduate: ESCP Business School Bachelor in Management graduated 2026

GPA: 3.7/4.0 (~15.4/20, around top quartile overall)

GMAT:
575
This is currently one of my main concerns.
I scored 575 on the GMAT Focus after several months of preparation. My preparation was somewhat inconsistent because of university/internships, although there were also periods where I studied intensively every day. Poor time management is also responsible for many lost points.
Given the amount of time already invested and the level of the schools I am targeting, I am questioning whether continuing with the GMAT makes sense or whether I should switch to the GRE and see if the format suits me better.
I would particularly appreciate opinions on:
  • How damaging is a 575 for my target MiFs/MiMs given the rest of my academic record?
  • What GMAT score would make my profile genuinely competitive?
  • Would switching to GRE make sense at this stage?
  • What GRE score should I target for LBS/LSE/INSEAD-level programmes?
Career Goal
My target is Investment Banking / Transaction Services, ideally in London or another major European financial centre, potentially moving towards PE longer term.

What happened with my 2026 applications :
I initially planned to apply to around 6–7 programmes top finance programs (LBS, LSE, HEC...) unfortunately, the application cycle went very badly from an execution standpoint.

The biggest issues were not feeling ready for gmat and delaying until near final round deadline, and academic references. Several programmes required two academic referees. Although professors initially agreed to support me, actually obtaining the recommendations before the deadlines became extremely difficult.

In the end, LBS MFA was the only application I managed to submit completely. I applied relatively late in the cycle and did not even receive a rejection email.
So I don't think my 2026 results really tell me whether my profile was competitive for the broader school list, since most applications were never submitted.
Main question: MiF or MiM for 2027?
This experience has made me reconsider whether I should apply almost exclusively to specialised Finance Masters again.
For 2027, I am considering LBS MiM, HEC MiM, INSEAD MiM but still apply for my ideal program being LSE MSc Finance.
I would really appreciate opinions on the following:

  1. Does my overall profile look more competitive for top MiMs or top MiFs?
  2. Does my relatively broad profile (broad international exposure, speak fluently 4 languages, intenrship experience, extracurricular leadership) fit MiM admissions better than highly specialised MiF admissions?
  3. Are top MiMs actually less competitive for my profile, or would I simply be replacing MiFs with equally competitive programs?
  4. How significant is my 575 GMAT score as a weakness? Should improving it be my absolute priority before applying?
  5. Given several months of GMAT preparation already, would you continue with GMAT or test the GRE instead?
For 2027 I intend to apply much earlier, try my best to find and secure my referees well in advance, and avoid repeating the execution problems of my previous cycle.

Any candid feedback is welcome, I am aware that my target programs may be too high but I feel like in today's market only top schools with distinguished network can make me stand up among other profiles.
User avatar
tiredengineer
Joined: 24 Jun 2026
Last visit: 19 Sep 2026
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q79 V85 DI84
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q79 V85 DI84
Posts: 8
Kudos: 3
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Inquiry regarding the importance of recommendation letters.

Hey guys, I'm currently applying for MiF programs across the top 20 unis across Europe and the UK (sep.2027 intake).

I graduated this year with a B.Sc in engineering from a top engineering school in Egypt, and have multiple months of experience across engineering, consulting and currently finance (Asset management). I'm trying to round out my profile as much as i can but my biggest concern comes from recommendation letters, specifically the academic ones.

My university is known for offering great graduate opportunities across Egypt and Germany, but it's mainly an engineering school, barely any candidates go the MiF route in Europe, so professors aren't really well versed in recommending candidates in that department.

And due to my early on interest in finance, i wasn't quite focused with uni the last 2 years (Engineering programs in Egypt run 5 years) so i don't really have any strong connections to any professors, only TA's.

My question is, how important really are academic letters of recommendation, could my profile be seriously weighed down by it? I'm worried it can be the reason my application becomes less competitive, or can having a generally strong profile (GPA, experience, GMAT/GRE) offset focus from the letters in any way?
User avatar
minusaccusamus
Joined: 13 Nov 2025
Last visit: 20 Sep 2026
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 8
Kudos: 3
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks man appreciate it. Best of luck
tiredengineer
Dealing with a similar issue, spent months studying the GMAT, scored relatively well in the official mocks (645-655), and ended up getting a very small number of mistakes on the actual exam (way less mistakes than the mock) yet ended up with a 595,

Obviously don't think that will be nearly as competitive as any other candidate so decided to switch to the GRE, will take the GRE tomorrow and let you know if its worth switching lol.

Best of luck.


User avatar
tiredengineer
Joined: 24 Jun 2026
Last visit: 19 Sep 2026
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q79 V85 DI84
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q79 V85 DI84
Posts: 8
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Unfortunately didn't do that much better, 314, probably sticking with the GMAT from now on
minusaccusamus
Thanks man appreciate it. Best of luck
User avatar
TheIvyLeagueEdge
User avatar
Admission Consultant
Joined: 13 Jul 2016
Last visit: 19 Sep 2026
Posts: 730
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 173
Status:Application Consultant
Affiliations: TheIvyLeagueEdge
Location: India
TheIvyLeagueEdge: Bala
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
Schools: Yale (A)
GMAT 1: 740 Q47 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE:Operations (Other)
Schools: Yale (A)
GMAT 1: 740 Q47 V44
Posts: 730
Kudos: 172
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For MiF programs the AdComs have little data from your professional accomplishments. This actually makes the dependence on the LORs even more than in the regular MBA case scenario.
Do not worry about getting the LORs from Finance Profs however. Whichever courses you have done well in, should be good source points to think about getting LORs from

Hope that helps. For a Free Assessment over a 1:1 call, please submit your profile https://theivyleagueedge.com/index.php/contactus/
_________________
Bala, Yale SOM Alum

1. WORLD'S MOST recommended Admissions Consultant on Linkedin
https://www.linkedin.com/in/balkrishna/
2. 100% 5-Star Reviews on PoetsandQuants
Poetsandquants(dot)com/consultant/bala-bal-krishna-shukla/

Why us?
** Single point of contact: Your consultant is a Yale SOM alum, with the HIGHEST number of recommendations GLOBALLY
** Insider knowledge (from serving and ex-AdComs from top schools)
** Unlimited support for 1-to-1 MBA admissions consulting.
tiredengineer
Inquiry regarding the importance of recommendation letters.

Hey guys, I'm currently applying for MiF programs across the top 20 unis across Europe and the UK (sep.2027 intake).

I graduated this year with a B.Sc in engineering from a top engineering school in Egypt, and have multiple months of experience across engineering, consulting and currently finance (Asset management). I'm trying to round out my profile as much as i can but my biggest concern comes from recommendation letters, specifically the academic ones.

My university is known for offering great graduate opportunities across Egypt and Germany, but it's mainly an engineering school, barely any candidates go the MiF route in Europe, so professors aren't really well versed in recommending candidates in that department.

And due to my early on interest in finance, i wasn't quite focused with uni the last 2 years (Engineering programs in Egypt run 5 years) so i don't really have any strong connections to any professors, only TA's.

My question is, how important really are academic letters of recommendation, could my profile be seriously weighed down by it? I'm worried it can be the reason my application becomes less competitive, or can having a generally strong profile (GPA, experience, GMAT/GRE) offset focus from the letters in any way?
User avatar
tiredengineer
Joined: 24 Jun 2026
Last visit: 19 Sep 2026
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q79 V85 DI84
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q79 V85 DI84
Posts: 8
Kudos: 3
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hey Man, I retook the GMAT, and ended up getting a 50 point increase in 2 weeks, my studying didn't change much, but I ended up changing 2 things in my strategy for which i think were the reason in this increase:

First, i stopped feeling bad for hard questions I knew I could answer eventually (Q & DI mainly), if I knew solving them would take me over 3 minutes, I skipped, with the hopes of getting back to them to change them if i had time in the section review. That gave me more time during the rest of the section to focus on easier questions and not break down towards the end.

Second, for questions that i didn't feel confident when reading the first time, i tried to match the logic with the answer choices, because usually (in Q specifically), some of the answer choices are quite obviously not the correct answer, which minimized my answer choices to 2 or 3 instead of 5, and sometimes having only 2 answers which you know include the correct one could allow you to do trial and error with both until one is right.
minusaccusamus
Thanks man appreciate it. Best of luck

User avatar
minusaccusamus
Joined: 13 Nov 2025
Last visit: 20 Sep 2026
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 8
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Nice congrats for the new score ! 50 points in 2 weeks is crazy good.

I feel like I have similar issues, being anxiety and bad time management where I spend 3-4 minutes on some harder questions which makes the rest of the section worse (mainly Q and DI). Verbal was fairly easy in mocks but, for some reason, went horrible in the actual exam.

Do you bother summarizing your studying strategy ? For now I am only doing sets of questions form gmat club in 555-655 difficulty because that's where most questions are on the test day. Will probably also start a subscription with TTP heard of good feedback so might as well try that.

Also thanks for the trial and error advice, I rarely do that but I should give it a try when stuck.
tiredengineer
Hey Man, I retook the GMAT, and ended up getting a 50 point increase in 2 weeks, my studying didn't change much, but I ended up changing 2 things in my strategy for which i think were the reason in this increase:

First, i stopped feeling bad for hard questions I knew I could answer eventually (Q & DI mainly), if I knew solving them would take me over 3 minutes, I skipped, with the hopes of getting back to them to change them if i had time in the section review. That gave me more time during the rest of the section to focus on easier questions and not break down towards the end.

Second, for questions that i didn't feel confident when reading the first time, i tried to match the logic with the answer choices, because usually (in Q specifically), some of the answer choices are quite obviously not the correct answer, which minimized my answer choices to 2 or 3 instead of 5, and sometimes having only 2 answers which you know include the correct one could allow you to do trial and error with both until one is right.

User avatar
tiredengineer
Joined: 24 Jun 2026
Last visit: 19 Sep 2026
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q79 V85 DI84
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q79 V85 DI84
Posts: 8
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Studying wise I mainly only studied Q and DI questions, I didn't solve any Verbal questions.

For quant, I absolutely spammed nearly every single gmatclub question in the quiz section, I'd recommend (based off my personal opinion) to solve harder questions (655+) even if you keep getting them wrong, until you get the hang of them, cus once you do, any Q questions under 655 will feel like carrying the light dumbells after months at the gym.

For DI, I also personally think time management is more important than the caliber of question itself, I personally found DI questions to be a lot easier than Q questions, but they usually took way more time, so I used to just practice as many as i could in any difficulty but always try to solve them within the 2 minute time frame.


minusaccusamus
Nice congrats for the new score ! 50 points in 2 weeks is crazy good.

I feel like I have similar issues, being anxiety and bad time management where I spend 3-4 minutes on some harder questions which makes the rest of the section worse (mainly Q and DI). Verbal was fairly easy in mocks but, for some reason, went horrible in the actual exam.

Do you bother summarizing your studying strategy ? For now I am only doing sets of questions form gmat club in 555-655 difficulty because that's where most questions are on the test day. Will probably also start a subscription with TTP heard of good feedback so might as well try that.

Also thanks for the trial and error advice, I rarely do that but I should give it a try when stuck.
User avatar
minusaccusamus
Joined: 13 Nov 2025
Last visit: 20 Sep 2026
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 8
Kudos: 3
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yeah I'm trying to get long streaks of right answers then I'll do the same for the harder questions. DI is alright, 90% of my errors there come from DS questions so I'm gonna focus on that too.

Thanks for the advices
tiredengineer
Studying wise I mainly only studied Q and DI questions, I didn't solve any Verbal questions.

For quant, I absolutely spammed nearly every single gmatclub question in the quiz section, I'd recommend (based off my personal opinion) to solve harder questions (655+) even if you keep getting them wrong, until you get the hang of them, cus once you do, any Q questions under 655 will feel like carrying the light dumbells after months at the gym.

For DI, I also personally think time management is more important than the caliber of question itself, I personally found DI questions to be a lot easier than Q questions, but they usually took way more time, so I used to just practice as many as i could in any difficulty but always try to solve them within the 2 minute time frame.



User avatar
SaveSilk
Joined: 14 Apr 2026
Last visit: 19 Sep 2026
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
Products:
Posts: 14
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello,
Can you please review my profile.
I have done Btech in CSE with 7.6 and have 2+ year of work ex as an automation developer in an international MNC. I have made some finance projects too, which are away from my tech projects. I have done some social work too. My GMAT FE score is 645 so, how are the chances of an MIM in HEC, ESCP or ESSEC, IE etc.
Thanks
User avatar
MBAandBeyond
User avatar
MBA and Beyond Consulting
Joined: 13 Jul 2020
Last visit: 19 Sep 2026
Posts: 4,512
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 176
Status:MBA Admissions Consulting from INSEAD, Wharton and Columbia graduates
Affiliations: INSEAD and Harvard
Location: Singapore
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,512
Kudos: 984
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi, a B.Tech CSE with 2+ years of full-time work experience at an international MNC is actually an unusual profile for MiM programmes and most MiM applicants have little to no work experience. But I need to be honest about the score and GPA challenges, and the significant limitation that I don't know your nationality, which matters enormously for how competitive your pool actually is.

Your 645 GMAT Focus sits just below HEC Paris MiM's published average of 655. That's workable in isolation but here's the critical nuance: for Indian applicants specifically, the competition is the toughest at HEC Paris. Without knowing your nationality, I can't be precise.

Successful HEC Paris MiM candidates typically demonstrate strong academics, competitive GMAT or GRE scores, international exposure, and clear career direction. A 7.6 is below the competitive academic zone for HEC specifically, though ESCP and IE are more forgiving on this dimension.

What's Working ::
- Your 2+ years of full-time work experience at an international MNC is your single most distinctive asset for MiM programmes. This is real and meaningful.
- The finance projects alongside your technical work signals commercial curiosity that adcoms value. The social work adds a community dimension.


School-by-School Assessment ::

HEC Paris MiM is your most ambitious target and the one where your profile faces the most friction. Your 645 GMAT sits below their effective competitive range for strong applicant pool nationalities, and your 7.6 GPA adds a second concern. If you're a non-Indian national, your odds improve significantly.

ESSEC Grande École is your strongest target of the four. ESSEC offers slightly more flexibility on test scores and profile diversity than HEC Paris, while ESCP is the most accessible option among the three. 645 GMAT is workable here. Genuine target.

ESCP MiM is your most accessible and reliable target. Your 645 GMAT and work experience make you a credible ESCP candidate. Treat as an anchor.

IE MiM is an excellent fit for your profile specifically. IE is more accessible on both GPA and GMAT than HEC or ESSEC. Strong target alongside ESCP.


Schools to Add ::

SDA Bocconi MiM (Milan) is ranked among the top European MiM programmes and consistently underestimated by applicants chasing HEC and ESSEC. Your 645 GMAT is workable here. Strong merit scholarship potential for competitive profiles, and the Italian job market has genuine consulting and finance placement strength. Add it as a strong target.

ESADE MiM (Barcelona) takes a genuinely holistic view of candidates and values professional initiative and entrepreneurial thinking, and more accessible on GPA and GMAT than your current four schools. Genuine target with real scholarship potential.


Nationality and gender matter enormously and if you're Indian, the competitive pool analysis changes significantly. Your specific post-MiM career goal is essential; without it, every school's essay will be generic and weak. The nature of your MNC role — what you actually did, what you built, what changed because of your work, is the centrepiece of every application.
MBA and Beyond has placed candidates at HEC Paris MiM, ESSEC, IE, etc., and a free 1:1 with one of our consultants would give you a more precise assessment and clarity, nationality-specific pool analysis, and essay strategy. No pressure — just practical guidance on the path forward.
BOOK YOUR FREE 1:1 SLOT HERE


SaveSilk
Hello,
Can you please review my profile.
I have done Btech in CSE with 7.6 and have 2+ year of work ex as an automation developer in an international MNC. I have made some finance projects too, which are away from my tech projects. I have done some social work too. My GMAT FE score is 645 so, how are the chances of an MIM in HEC, ESCP or ESSEC, IE etc.
Thanks
User avatar
teneturcommodi
Joined: 23 Nov 2025
Last visit: 17 Sep 2026
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Background and nationality - Indian
Undergrad Information - IISc Bangalore (tier 1), cgpa - 8.4
GMAT/GRE - 695 gmat focus
Work experience and leadership - 2 years in a startup as full stack engineer with leading multiple project implementations.
3+ positions in collage, elected to be part of student council
Post Master goals - work in fintech

Target schools - hec (mim, mfin), essec(mim), insead(mim), escp(mim)
User avatar
MBAandBeyond
User avatar
MBA and Beyond Consulting
Joined: 13 Jul 2020
Last visit: 19 Sep 2026
Posts: 4,512
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 176
Status:MBA Admissions Consulting from INSEAD, Wharton and Columbia graduates
Affiliations: INSEAD and Harvard
Location: Singapore
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,512
Kudos: 984
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi there, IISc Bangalore (having an unambiguous global reputation in STEM) with an 8.4 CGPA and a 695 GMAT Focus is a genuinely strong academic package for European MiM programmes — and I mean that specifically. Having said that, the HEC MFin is a very different programme from the MiM and needs separate handling, your fintech goal needs sharpening, and the Indian applicant pool dynamics still apply.

One Critical Strategic Issue — MiM vs. MFin

You've listed both HEC MiM and HEC MFin as targets. These are fundamentally different programmes and the distinction matters enormously.
The HEC Paris MFin programme is best suited for students who already know they want finance rather than a general business degree, with strong links to finance roles such as M&A, private equity, asset management, structured finance, trading, and consulting.
The MFin gives you deep finance technical training. The MiM gives you broader management exposure like fintech from the product, strategy, or general management side.
This is a meaningful fork in the road and your essays will need to reflect a clear, specific choice. Trying to apply to both simultaneously without a coherent narrative weakens both applications. MBA and Beyond's profile experts can help you decide which path aligns better with your specific fintech vision — worth a focused 1:1 on this question specifically.

The Fintech Goal ::

"Work in fintech" covers an enormous range of roles and company types. Adcoms at HEC, INSEAD, and ESSEC will probe this directly. The more specific your answer, the more credible your application becomes.


School-by-School Assessment ::

HEC Paris MiM is a genuine target for your profile. For Indian applicants specifically, the competition is the toughest at HEC Paris. Unlike ESSEC or ESCP, where a 650 to 660 can still be competitive, HEC typically sees a much stronger concentration of applicants in the 680 to 720 range. At 695, you're within that concentration. Your central challenge is a sharp, specific fintech narrative that connects everything. Genuine Target.

HEC Paris MFin is a reach at 695 given the median GMAT of 715. Workable but below the comfortable zone for this programme specifically. Your IISc engineering foundation is relevant. Apply if your fintech goal is finance-oriented, but go in knowing the score gap and career background create a double challenge. We can help you assess whether the MFin or MiM is the stronger strategic choice for your specific goals.

ESSEC Grande École is a strong target and arguably your most reliable top-tier French admit. ESSEC offers slightly more flexibility on test scores and profile diversity than HEC Paris. Your 695 GMAT is comfortably above their competitive range, and your IISc credential is distinctive in ESSEC's cohort. Solid target.

INSEAD MiM is your most ambitious application. INSEAD prizes multicultural exposure and international perspective above all else. The interview is also an important part of the selection process because it allows INSEAD to assess communication skills, motivation, maturity, and programme fit. Genuine reach — apply with a precise "why INSEAD" essay.

ESCP MiM is your most accessible and reliable target. Your 695 GMAT is well above their competitive range, and ESCP's multicampus structure gives you European market access. Treat as your anchor alongside ESSEC.


Schools Worth Adding ::

SDA Bocconi MiM offers strong merit scholarships for academically strong profiles. Your IISc 8.4 CGPA and 695 GMAT could make you a scholarship candidate there. Strong addition.

IE MiM is worth adding given its innovation and technology focus. More accessible Indian applicant pool and strong European placement.


Your profile has genuine competitive strength for this school list, the work now is building a sharp, specific narrative around it. MBA and Beyond has deep experience placing Indian engineering candidates at HEC Paris MiM, ESSEC, and ESCP. A free 1:1 with one of our consultants would give you precise clarity on the MiM vs. MFin decision and your essay strategy. No pressure — just practical guidance on the path forward.
BOOK YOUR FREE 1:1 CALL SLOT

teneturcommodi
Background and nationality - Indian
Undergrad Information - IISc Bangalore (tier 1), cgpa - 8.4
GMAT/GRE - 695 gmat focus
Work experience and leadership - 2 years in a startup as full stack engineer with leading multiple project implementations.
3+ positions in collage, elected to be part of student council
Post Master goals - work in fintech

Target schools - hec (mim, mfin), essec(mim), insead(mim), escp(mim)
   1  ...  45   46   47   48