here's my devil's advocate (although it may be too late with the deadline). first of all, congrats on getting into two great programs!
discover1604
Hi all!
I got in to both MIT Sloan and Berkeley Haas and have really been struggling with the decision, so appreciate all the help / insight I can get here. I think both programs are great, and tend to have nice, interesting and creative people, which I value. I am currently working in consulting (focus on digital health) and am interested in transitioning to tech companies. I'd like to focus either on product management or strategy roles there. Not interested primarily in startups -- more interested in mid-sized to larger tech (but definitely open to the right opportunity). As a background, I am originally from India and went to a liberal arts school in the northeast for undergrad, and then have been living / working in NYC since. Geographically speaking, I don't have a strong preference for one area, though given my career interests would like to end up in either NYC or SF post grad.
Here are my primary thoughts on the two programs:
MIT Sloan
Pros: the MIT brand has a strong recognition globally ; cool action learning labs ; the other students there are just super cool ; MIT as a university and being close to lot of smart people from across the world (larger MIT / Harvard)
Cons: Boston is cold! ; I am a bit intimidated by the quantitative rigor of the curriculum and the grade disclosure (though I have heard that it is as scary as you make it)
Berkeley Haas
Pros: Bay Area as a center for greater innovation (at least compared directly to Boston) ; better weather ; grade non-disclosure
Cons: smaller class (I like the 400 class size of Sloan better than the 240 of Haas) ; brand strength (I know the brand for Berkeley Haas is strong, but most of their alums end up in the Bay Area)
Neither of them are offering me any money. Berkeley is relatively lower on the tuition but has higher cost of living than Boston, which will lower the gap of attendance between the two. Really appreciate any insights on which would be a better investment of my time and money.
-Berkeley also has a very strong rep globally, ESPECIALLY in east Asia. You're also going to get good proximity to "smart people" just by being near SV/SF and Stanford (a la Sloan and Harvard). Berkeley as a university is also incredibly intelligent--so many of its departments are world-class.
-I spoke with a Sloanie, who was incredibly kind, and interned at a PM role after 1Y in SF. However, he let me know that there wasn't much Sloan offered in terms of getting his PM role other than the collaborative nature of the students practicing for interviews--which a culture you'll find in both schools. An MIT "track" didn't particularly help him, nor did any action learning labs.
-I got a lot more sense of "fun" at Berkeley. I did a coffee chat at MIT and the student had to finish his problem set before he could really talk to us. No joke.
For class size, Berkeley also has the EWMBA, which also often work on teams together with FTMBA in case competitions and more.
-All said, in the end, you can't really "go wrong" with either. If you went to their admitted students weekends, did you favor any one over the other?