AkshayChungade01 wrote:
Buddy, can you please look into this problem.
The passage mentions "What is instead remarkable is that with hundreds of researchers striving to make breakthroughs in climatology, very few find evidence that global warming is unlikely.", whereas option B states "Most researchers in climatology have substantial motive to find evidence that would discredit the global warming hypothesis.".
I am not able to connect these two statements.
Statement in the passage says "Out of people who are trying to make it big in a certain department only a few have evidence in opposition to global warming.
And Answer choice B states " Lot of researchers are motivated to discredit Global Warming"
Hi Akshay
Let me try to clarify your doubt.
We are asked to identify that answer option for which support is found in the information provided in the stimulus. Answer option (B) states: Most researchers in climatology have substantial motive to find evidence that would discredit the global warming hypothesis.
Support for this statement is found not in the statement you have mentioned ("...very few find evidence that global warming is unlikely"). It is found earlier in the stimulus, where it states: "Nothing brings more recognition than overthrowing conventional wisdom".
If we accept the reasonable assumption that most scientists would like to obtain recognition for their work, it flows logically that most of them would like to disprove the likelihood of global warming. That likelihood of global warming is the "conventional wisdom" is explicitly mentioned in the stimulus wherein it states: "It is accordingly unsurprising that some scientists are skeptical of the
widely accepted predictions of global warming".
Thus option (B) is best supported by information presented in the stimulus.
Hope this clarifies.