Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 09:12 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 09:12
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,290
Own Kudos:
49,305
 [13]
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Posts: 17,290
Kudos: 49,305
 [13]
Movie Producer: Test screenings are an essential part of making a prof Updated on: 30 Sep 2023, 10:29
Originally posted by Sajjad1994 on 04 Aug 2021, 22:00.
Last edited by BottomJee on 30 Sep 2023, 10:29, edited 2 times in total.
Moved to new forum
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
10
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide Answer
Hide
Show
History
Movie
Producer: Many blockbuster movies include scenes that test audiences did not enjoy. Screenwriter: A movie that is released without test screenings is likely to have a very limited run.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

85% (hard)

Question Stats:

45% (02:04) correct 55% (02:08) wrong based on 1402 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Movie Producer: Test screenings are an essential part of making a profitable movie; the test screenings allow us to identify scenes that the audience doesn't enjoy and cut those scenes from the movie.

Screenwriter: We should do away with test screenings altogether; making changes based on test screenings would destroy the artistic integrity of my film, and I want the masses to experience my artistic vision.

In the table below, identify which statement, if true, most seriously weakens the Movie Producer's argument, and which statement, if true, most seriously weakens the Screenwriter's argument.
Movie
Producer 		Screenwriter Statements
Many blockbuster movies include scenes that test audiences did not enjoy.
A movie that is released without test screenings is likely to have a very limited run.
Test screenings are not the only method for evaluating the potential success of a movie.
Some test screening audiences do not enjoy any scenes of a movie, while others enjoy almost every scene.
Test screenings can also be used to determine which scenes from the movie should be featured in the movie's trailer.
Submit Answer
Start the Timer above, select the radio buttons, and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log.
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
Movie
Producer: Many blockbuster movies include scenes that test audiences did not enjoy. Screenwriter: A movie that is released without test screenings is likely to have a very limited run.
User avatar
thelonghalloween
User avatar
Joined: 14 Jun 2020
Last visit: 22 Oct 2021
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
81
 [1]
Given Kudos: 119
Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V33 (Online)
GRE 1: Q170 V151
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Products:
My Reviews
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V33 (Online)
GRE 1: Q170 V151
Posts: 62
Kudos: 81
 [1]
Movie Producer: Test screenings are an essential part of making a prof 08 Aug 2021, 04:10
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A CR question masked as IR, but a easy one

Producer: Test screenings essential to remove non-enjoyed clippings
Screenwriter: Do away with that, as I want audience to experience my artistic vision

Many blockbuster movies include scenes that test audiences did not enjoy
This weakens Producer's position.

A movie that is released without test screenings is likely to have a very limited run.
This weakens Screenwriter's position.

Sajjad1994
Movie Producer: Test screenings are an essential part of making a profitable movie; the test screenings allow us to identify scenes that the audience doesn't enjoy and cut those scenes from the movie.

Screenwriter: We should do away with test screenings altogether; making changes based on test screenings would destroy the artistic integrity of my film, and I want the masses to experience my artistic vision.

In the table below, identify which statement, if true, most seriously weakens the Movie Producer's argument, and which statement, if true, most seriously weakens the Screenwriter's argument.

Movie ProducerScreenwriterStatements
Many blockbuster movies include scenes that test audiences did not enjoy.
A movie that is released without test screenings is likely to have a very limited run.
Test screenings are not the only method for evaluating the potential success of a movie.
Some test screening audiences do not enjoy any scenes of a movie, while others enjoy almost every scene.
Test screenings can also be used to determine which scenes from the movie should be featured in the movie's trailer.

Show SpoilerOA
Movie Producer: Many blockbuster movies include scenes that test audiences did not enjoy.
Screenwriter: A movie that is released without test screenings is likely to have a very limited run.

IR Butler 2021 - Practice 2 IR Questions Everyday.
Question # 262, Date : 05-Aug-2021
This question is a part of IR Butler 2021. Click here for Details
Show more
User avatar
Bhavita.
User avatar
Joined: 25 Jul 2023
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
11
 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Location: United States Minor Outlying Islands
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Schools: Kellogg '26
Schools: Kellogg '26
Posts: 12
Kudos: 11
 [1]
Movie Producer: Test screenings are an essential part of making a prof 05 May 2024, 04:21
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
How does movie released without test screenings is likely to have a very limited run weaken the Screen writer argument. Moreover I feel any new info that tells or that lies along the reasoning that test screening actually doesnt result in making of any changes would weaken the conclusion­
User avatar
Harshit4232
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jan 2024
Last visit: 06 Aug 2024
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
7
 [3]
Given Kudos: 14
Location: India
Schools: ISB '27 IIM Ivey '25
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q90 V80 DI76
GPA: 8.31
Schools: ISB '27 IIM Ivey '25
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q90 V80 DI76
Posts: 8
Kudos: 7
 [3]
Movie Producer: Test screenings are an essential part of making a prof 06 May 2024, 00:15
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bhavita.
How does movie released without test screenings is likely to have a very limited run weaken the Screen writer argument. Moreover I feel any new info that tells or that lies along the reasoning that test screening actually doesnt result in making of any changes would weaken the conclusion­
Show more
­Since the screenwriter wants his artistic vision to be experienced by 'masses', a limited run without test screening will hamper SWs goal of reaching to the masses, hence weakens his argument.
User avatar
Vibhatu
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2021
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 183
Own Kudos:
51
 [1]
Given Kudos: 186
Posts: 183
Kudos: 51
 [1]
Movie Producer: Test screenings are an essential part of making a prof 22 Jun 2025, 01:08
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
"Test screenings are not the only method for evaluating the potential success of a movie." why cant be this for weakening Producer's position.?
someone please explain. Thanks in advance!!
User avatar
cheshire
User avatar
DI Forum Moderator
Joined: 26 Jun 2025
Last visit: 18 Sep 2025
Posts: 270
Own Kudos:
256
 [1]
Given Kudos: 34
Posts: 270
Kudos: 256
 [1]
Movie Producer: Test screenings are an essential part of making a prof 26 Jun 2025, 15:26
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Vibhatu
"Test screenings are not the only method for evaluating the potential success of a movie." why cant be this for weakening Producer's position.?
someone please explain. Thanks in advance!!
Show more
Why "Test screenings are not the only method for evaluating the potential success of a movie" does not most seriously weaken the Movie Producer's argument:
-The Movie Producer claims that test screenings are essential because they help identify and remove scenes the audience doesn’t enjoy, which makes the movie more profitable.
-The statement only says that other methods exist—it doesn’t prove that test screenings are not effective or not needed. So it doesn’t directly challenge the idea that test screenings are crucial for profitability.

Why "Many blockbuster movies include scenes that test audiences did not enjoy" does most seriously weaken the Movie Producer’s argument:
-This directly undermines the producer's claim. If test audiences dislike certain scenes, but those scenes remain in successful blockbuster movies, it suggests that removing such scenes (based on test screenings) may not be necessary for making a profitable film.
-That strikes at the heart of the Producer’s argument and weakens it more seriously.
User avatar
ahddhah
User avatar
Joined: 04 Aug 2023
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
6
Given Kudos: 19
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q88 V79 DI79
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q88 V77 DI81
GMAT Focus 3: 655 Q87 V83 DI78
Products:
Forum Quiz
GMAT Focus 3: 655 Q87 V83 DI78
Posts: 62
Kudos: 6
Movie Producer: Test screenings are an essential part of making a prof 28 Jun 2025, 07:16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
is it right to assume that blockbuster movie is profitable movie
User avatar
ShubhadeepB
User avatar
Joined: 30 Apr 2020
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
7
Given Kudos: 21
GMAT 1: 740 Q51 V38
GMAT 1: 740 Q51 V38
Posts: 30
Kudos: 7
Movie Producer: Test screenings are an essential part of making a prof 28 Jun 2025, 22:13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Definitely, a blockbuster movie is always a commercially successful movie.
ahddhah
is it right to assume that blockbuster movie is profitable movie
Show more
User avatar
Pranavsawant
User avatar
Joined: 20 Jun 2025
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 87
Own Kudos:
7
Given Kudos: 316
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Posts: 87
Kudos: 7
Movie Producer: Test screenings are an essential part of making a prof 31 Jul 2025, 14:40
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Test screenings can also be used to determine which scenes from the movie should be featured in the movie's trailer.

Doesn't this also weaken the SW's argument? The SW seems to be more concerned about the artistic integrity rather than profitability and argues that test screenings SHOULD BE DONE AWAY ALTOGETHER. This options provides a valuable use case of test screenings and hence directly counters his main argument: to do away with test screenings altogether.

Whereas a movie with a very limited run can also reach the masses (let's say it becomes very popular by the President of that country endorsing the film)

bb
KarishmaB
User avatar
cheshire
User avatar
DI Forum Moderator
Joined: 26 Jun 2025
Last visit: 18 Sep 2025
Posts: 270
Own Kudos:
256
 [2]
Given Kudos: 34
Posts: 270
Kudos: 256
 [2]
Movie Producer: Test screenings are an essential part of making a prof 31 Jul 2025, 19:43
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A movie with a "limited run" is defined as a film released in under 600 theaters. Studio's are inclined to do this when the movie isn't predicted to perform well. Without test screenings, it is likely very few people will view the movie and therefore doesn't fulfill the SW's desire for the film to be seen by the "masses." Also, you pointed out the the SW is concerned about his artistic vision, wouldn't it make sense that he would want to make it according to his ideas rather than that of the test screening? We aren't trying to argue that test screening has multiple use cases, we already know that, instead we want to prove that a test screening is required for the SW to get his film viewed by the masses.
Pranavsawant
Test screenings can also be used to determine which scenes from the movie should be featured in the movie's trailer.

Doesn't this also weaken the SW's argument? The SW seems to be more concerned about the artistic integrity rather than profitability and argues that test screenings SHOULD BE DONE AWAY ALTOGETHER. This options provides a valuable use case of test screenings and hence directly counters his main argument: to do away with test screenings altogether.

Whereas a movie with a very limited run can also reach the masses (let's say it becomes very popular by the President of that country endorsing the film)

bb
KarishmaB
Show more
User avatar
Pranavsawant
User avatar
Joined: 20 Jun 2025
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 87
Own Kudos:
7
Given Kudos: 316
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Posts: 87
Kudos: 7
Movie Producer: Test screenings are an essential part of making a prof 02 Aug 2025, 11:35
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
You don't counter my argument at all. First of all, the definition of a limited run is not given in the passage and hence we cannot assume any such predefined knowledge. Secondly, like I said, just because it has a limited run doesn't mean that it was not shown to the masses. A movie running for 10 days can reach a million people but a movie running for a 100 days can barely reach a thousand people. Just because it has a limited run doesn't necessarily imply that it didn't reach the masses. Moreover, the bigger argument is that the SW wants to get rid of it altogether. However, if it does have some benefit after all, then that does weaken his claim.
cheshire
A movie with a "limited run" is defined as a film released in under 600 theaters. Studio's are inclined to do this when the movie isn't predicted to perform well. Without test screenings, it is likely very few people will view the movie and therefore doesn't fulfill the SW's desire for the film to be seen by the "masses." Also, you pointed out the the SW is concerned about his artistic vision, wouldn't it make sense that he would want to make it according to his ideas rather than that of the test screening? We aren't trying to argue that test screening has multiple use cases, we already know that, instead we want to prove that a test screening is required for the SW to get his film viewed by the masses.
Pranavsawant
Test screenings can also be used to determine which scenes from the movie should be featured in the movie's trailer.

Doesn't this also weaken the SW's argument? The SW seems to be more concerned about the artistic integrity rather than profitability and argues that test screenings SHOULD BE DONE AWAY ALTOGETHER. This options provides a valuable use case of test screenings and hence directly counters his main argument: to do away with test screenings altogether.

Whereas a movie with a very limited run can also reach the masses (let's say it becomes very popular by the President of that country endorsing the film)

bb
KarishmaB
Show more
User avatar
cheshire
User avatar
DI Forum Moderator
Joined: 26 Jun 2025
Last visit: 18 Sep 2025
Posts: 270
Own Kudos:
256
 [1]
Given Kudos: 34
Posts: 270
Kudos: 256
 [1]
Movie Producer: Test screenings are an essential part of making a prof 02 Aug 2025, 13:52
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
"Test screenings can also be used to determine which scenes from the movie should be featured in the movie's trailer."

This is the answer choice you are arguing. We have no context whether utilizing test screenings for movie trailers is beneficial or not. We only know that this option violates the SW's artistic integrity as the trailer would be catered to the test screening results. Had this choice said "movie trailers that utilized test screenings to decide featured scenes attracted more viewers on release" it would be arguable. But as it stands, this choice provides no benefit and doesn't counter his argument. On the other hand, "a movie that is released without test screenings is likely to have a very limited run" does counter it. A movie with a "very limited run" is guaranteed to be released in very few theaters for a very short amount of time making it nearly impossible for a large amount of people to view it. You argue this doesn't matter though, because a miracle will occur and the president will endorse the film. When selecting answers, I wouldn't base them in .1%, niche, or highly unusual situations that contrast status quo.
Pranavsawant
You don't counter my argument at all. First of all, the definition of a limited run is not given in the passage and hence we cannot assume any such predefined knowledge. Secondly, like I said, just because it has a limited run doesn't mean that it was not shown to the masses. A movie running for 10 days can reach a million people but a movie running for a 100 days can barely reach a thousand people. Just because it has a limited run doesn't necessarily imply that it didn't reach the masses. Moreover, the bigger argument is that the SW wants to get rid of it altogether. However, if it does have some benefit after all, then that does weaken his claim.
cheshire
A movie with a "limited run" is defined as a film released in under 600 theaters. Studio's are inclined to do this when the movie isn't predicted to perform well. Without test screenings, it is likely very few people will view the movie and therefore doesn't fulfill the SW's desire for the film to be seen by the "masses." Also, you pointed out the the SW is concerned about his artistic vision, wouldn't it make sense that he would want to make it according to his ideas rather than that of the test screening? We aren't trying to argue that test screening has multiple use cases, we already know that, instead we want to prove that a test screening is required for the SW to get his film viewed by the masses.
Pranavsawant
Test screenings can also be used to determine which scenes from the movie should be featured in the movie's trailer.

Doesn't this also weaken the SW's argument? The SW seems to be more concerned about the artistic integrity rather than profitability and argues that test screenings SHOULD BE DONE AWAY ALTOGETHER. This options provides a valuable use case of test screenings and hence directly counters his main argument: to do away with test screenings altogether.

Whereas a movie with a very limited run can also reach the masses (let's say it becomes very popular by the President of that country endorsing the film)

bb
KarishmaB
Show more
User avatar
manish8242
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2025
Last visit: 06 Nov 2025
Posts: 48
Posts: 48
Kudos: 0
Movie Producer: Test screenings are an essential part of making a prof 29 Oct 2025, 02:53
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I marked D for Part 1. It says some audience do not like any scene while other like total scenes. So this means this method can't be reliable. That's why i marked this and prefered over A option . Can you clear the thinking logic?
thelonghalloween
A CR question masked as IR, but a easy one

Producer: Test screenings essential to remove non-enjoyed clippings
Screenwriter: Do away with that, as I want audience to experience my artistic vision

Many blockbuster movies include scenes that test audiences did not enjoy
This weakens Producer's position.

A movie that is released without test screenings is likely to have a very limited run.
This weakens Screenwriter's position.


Show more
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,389
Own Kudos:
778,283
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,389
Kudos: 778,283
Movie Producer: Test screenings are an essential part of making a prof 29 Oct 2025, 03:52
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
manish8242
I marked D for Part 1. It says some audience do not like any scene while other like total scenes. So this means this method can't be reliable. That's why i marked this and prefered over A option . Can you clear the thinking logic?

Show more
A is stronger. D only shows taste varies; the producer can say they aggregate across groups, so D doesn’t touch “essential for profitability.” A shows blockbusters stayed profitable without cutting disliked scenes, directly breaking the “essential” claim.
User avatar
autemitaque
User avatar
Joined: 04 Aug 2025
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 4
Given Kudos: 8
Products:
GMAT Club Tests
Posts: 4
Kudos: 0
Movie Producer: Test screenings are an essential part of making a prof 29 Oct 2025, 11:09
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sajjad1994
Movie Producer: Test screenings are an essential part of making a profitable movie; the test screenings allow us to identify scenes that the audience doesn't enjoy and cut those scenes from the movie.

Screenwriter: We should do away with test screenings altogether; making changes based on test screenings would destroy the artistic integrity of my film, and I want the masses to experience my artistic vision.

In the table below, identify which statement, if true, most seriously weakens the Movie Producer's argument, and which statement, if true, most seriously weakens the Screenwriter's argument.
Show more
why is " A movie that is released without test screenings is likely to have a very limited run." is right instead of the last option for Screenwriter?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,389
Own Kudos:
778,283
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,389
Kudos: 778,283
Movie Producer: Test screenings are an essential part of making a prof 29 Oct 2025, 11:23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
autemitaque

why is " A movie that is released without test screenings is likely to have a very limited run." is right instead of the last option for Screenwriter?
Show more

Screenwriter says two things: kill screenings and let the masses see his vision. “Likely limited run without screenings” wrecks his second goal, so it directly weakens him.

The trailer statement doesn’t weaken him. It only says screenings can help marketing; it says nothing about harming integrity or reducing audience, so his claim stands.
Moderators:
Bunuel
Math Expert
105389 posts
kingbucky
496 posts