Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 21:15 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 21:15
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
505-555 Level|   Weaken|         
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
778,095
 [2]
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,095
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
alexjsfk
Joined: 29 Dec 2018
Last visit: 19 Apr 2023
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
42
 [2]
Given Kudos: 9
Location: Romania
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V34
GPA: 3.84
WE:Project Management (Telecommunications)
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V34
Posts: 39
Kudos: 42
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
exc4libur
Joined: 24 Nov 2016
Last visit: 22 Mar 2022
Posts: 1,686
Own Kudos:
1,447
 [1]
Given Kudos: 607
Location: United States
Posts: 1,686
Kudos: 1,447
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
inesserra
Joined: 15 Jan 2020
Last visit: 11 Apr 2022
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
7
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 8
Kudos: 7
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(C) It does not acknowledge the fact that a traffic jam following an accident is unavoidable while the mass punishment was avoidable.

This is actually the analogy that is made. C is the correct answer
avatar
StevenA
Joined: 23 Mar 2017
Last visit: 09 May 2022
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Location: Singapore
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The principal provided a false analogy in the principal's reply to Mrs. Smith. In traffic jams caused by accidents, indeed the commuters do not have any options apart from staying in the cars while waiting for the first responders. However, in this judgment, the Principal has the full ownership and rights to give the right punishment to the class and does not mean it has to punish the whole class.
avatar
chaitralirr
Joined: 17 Mar 2019
Last visit: 07 Oct 2021
Posts: 363
Own Kudos:
290
 [1]
Given Kudos: 35
Location: India
Concentration: Healthcare, General Management
Schools:
GPA: 3.75
WE:Pharmaceuticals (Healthcare/Pharmaceuticals)
Schools:
Posts: 363
Kudos: 290
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ms. Smith: I am upset that my son’s entire class lost two days of recess because some of the children were throwing raisins in the cafeteria. He was not throwing raisins, and it was clear to everyone just who the culprits were.

Principal: I’m sorry you’re upset, Ms. Smith, but your son’s situation is like being caught in a traffic jam caused by an accident. People who aren’t involved in the accident nevertheless have to suffer by sitting there in the middle of it.

Stimulus: states that Mrs smith complains that her son was not throwing resins in cafeteria; however still he will have to loose two days of recess. The principal explains to Mrs Smith that her sons case is similar to the traffic caused by an accident. Some people who are not involved in the accident have to suffer.
IMO C the principal does not consider the fact that punishment like accident traffic could be avoidable.


The principal’s response to Ms. Smith’s complaint is most vulnerable to criticism on which one of the following grounds?


(A) it makes a generalization about all the children in the class which is not justified by the facts.

(B) It suggests that throwing raisins in the cafeteria produces as much inconvenience as does being caught in a traffic jam.

(C) It does not acknowledge the fact that a traffic jam following an accident is unavoidable while the mass punishment was avoidable.

(D) It assumes that Ms. Smith’s son is guilty when there is evidence to the contrary which the principal has disregarded.

(E) It attempts to confuse the point at issue by introducing irrelevant facts about the incident.
avatar
Danis73
Joined: 14 Dec 2019
Last visit: 22 Jul 2020
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer is C.
Comparing two situations in the question does not make any rationale and the point which differentiates them is occurence (avoidable or not avoidable).
avatar
GMAT0010
Joined: 17 Sep 2019
Last visit: 08 Dec 2022
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 516
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GMAT 2: 680 Q49 V33
GMAT 2: 680 Q49 V33
Posts: 106
Kudos: 55
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,
I got caught in between options A and C, but I chose C instead because it was much more precise and identified the problem at hand but I still have a minute misunderstanding of option A. Why is A wrong? The traffic jam example is a generalization and the child was wrongly punished too.
Please correct me!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts