GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 24 Mar 2019, 00:06

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separated an inver

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 07 Jun 2015
Posts: 1
Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separated an inver  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Sep 2016, 10:25
2
This is my first post so pardon me if I am not up to the general standards of the club.

Following is how I went about solving question #9

9. Which of the following circumstances is most comparable to the impasse biologists encountered in trying to resolve the debate about cell determination (lines 12-18)?

Prethinking: As the passage quotes , the debate was “.....But the debate could not be resolved because no one was able to ask the crucial questions in a form in which they could be pursued productively......”
Above quote means that scientists were basically not knowing what they had to pursue / analyze / prove or determine.

(A) The problems faced by a literary scholar who wishes to use original source materials that are written in an unfamiliar foreign language
------ Incorrect. The choice does not match with our prethinking. Foreign language could be learnt and translated.

(B) The situation of a mathematician who in preparing a proof of a theorem for publication detects a reasoning error in the proof
------ Incorrect. The choice does not match with our prethinking. Here, the mathematician knows about the reasoning error and also knows what has to be proved.

(C) The difficulties of a space engineer who has to design equipment to function in an environment in which it cannot first be tested
------ Incorrect. The choice does not match with our prethinking. From this choice we can’t infer that the space engineer does not know what has to be designed. The choice states that in space, the equipment can’t be first tested. It may so happen that we may think a bit more than required and assume that testing is necessary for designing.

(D) The predicament of a linguist trying to develop a theory of language acquisition when knowledge of the structure of language itself is rudimentary at best
---- CORRECT. This choice matches our prethinking. If the structure of the language itself is rudimentary (meaning: fundamental; basic ; being in the early stages of development) , there is no point in developing a theory of language acquisition as the developing language may acquire many things that would render the theory incredible.

(E) The dilemma confronting a foundation when the funds available to it are sufficient to support one of two equally deserving scientific projects but not both
------ Incorrect. The choice does not match with our prethinking. The foundation knows that the fund allocation has to be made to one of the 2 deserving scientific projects. Moreover, it’s the foundation which will decide to whom the fund is allotted.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 15 Jul 2016
Posts: 4
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 770 Q49 V48
GPA: 3.54
Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separated an inver  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Mar 2017, 18:43
Explanation of question 3:

the passage states,
"an unfertilized egg contains substances that function as morphogenetic determinants. They are located in the cytoplasm of the egg cell;"
"The substances that Gross studied are maternal messenger RNA’s"
"these particular RNA’s direct, in large part, the synthesis of histones"
It follows that the since the RNA is located in the cytoplasm, the histones are synthesized in the cytoplasm.
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 24 Jan 2017
Posts: 142
GMAT 1: 640 Q50 V25
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.48
Reviews Badge
Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separated an inver  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 May 2017, 21:51
arunavamunshi1988 wrote:
All correct except the 3rd one in 20 mins... Need to work with my pacing..... Can anyone please explain the ans of question 3? It seems easy to others, but I have definitely messed up with something.


As per Q3, According to the passage, when biologists believed that the cells in the early embryo were undetermined, they made which of the following mistakes?
(A) They did not attempt to replicate the original experiment of separating an embryo into two parts.
(B) They did not realize that there was a connection between the issue of cell determination and the outcome of the separation experiment.
(C) They assumed that the results of experiments on embryos did not depend on the particular animal species used for such experiments.
(D) They assumed that it was crucial to perform the separation experiment at an early stage in the embryo’s life.
(E) They assumed that different ways of separating an embryo into two parts would be equivalent as far as the fate of the two parts was concerned.

As mentioned in the 1st para, especially these sentence "Later biologists found that the situation was not so simple. It matters in which plane the embryo is cut. If it is cut in a plane different from the one used by the early investigators, it will not form two whole embryos.", the problem is that the biologists use result of a particular case to emphasize generalization for all cases. They did not consider what will happen if the cut is made in a different plane (different ways of separating an embryo.......). That's why (E) is correct.

All other options cannot be inferred from the passage.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 27 Jun 2015
Posts: 59
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separated an inver  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 May 2017, 23:51
Can anyone explain question 1?.
Where is it mentioned remotely about the quantity of morphogenetic determinants?
Is the logic this :- an embryo can be separated to form two separate individual embryos and so morpho-determinants are subsequently used for tow embryos instead of one?
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
P
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 2336
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separated an inver  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jun 2017, 14:58
Quote:
It can be inferred from the passage that the morphogenetic determinants present in the early embryo are
(A) located in the nucleus of the embryo cells
(B) evenly distributed unless the embryo is not developing normally
(C) inactive until the embryo cells become irreversibly committed to their final function
(D) identical to those that were already present in the unfertilized egg
(E) present in larger quantities than is necessary for the development of a single individual

kkrrsshh wrote:
Can anyone explain question 1?.
Where is it mentioned remotely about the quantity of morphogenetic determinants?
Is the logic this :- an embryo can be separated to form two separate individual embryos and so morpho-determinants are subsequently used for tow embryos instead of one?

Yes, that's the correct logic! Although the "substances that function as morphogenetic determinants" are not evenly distributed, when the fertilized egg splits, at least some of the substances will go to each of the two new embryos if both are to "survive and develop as two normal embryos". If an early embryo only contained the exact quantity necessary for development, it would be impossible for the embryo to split and develop as two normal embryos.
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | Instagram | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars
Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply?
Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99 | Time management on verbal

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 Jun 2017
Posts: 2
Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separated an inver  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jun 2017, 00:28
Hi, can anybody explain me how Maternal Messenger RNA's are considered the morpho determinants?
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 24 Jan 2017
Posts: 142
GMAT 1: 640 Q50 V25
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.48
Reviews Badge
Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separated an inver  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jun 2017, 02:14
1
veepee wrote:
Hi, can anybody explain me how Maternal Messenger RNA's are considered the morpho determinants?


Hi,

Just read the 2nd paragraph and the beginning of the 3rd paragraph, then you're gonna see why

"Studying sea urchins, biologist Paul Gross found that an unfertilized egg contains substances that function as morphogenetic determinants. They are located in the cytoplasm of the egg cell; i.e., in that part of the cell’s protoplasm that lies outside of the nucleus. In the unfertilized egg, the substances are inactive and are not distributed homogeneously. When the egg is fertilized, the substances become active and, presumably, govern the behavior of the genes they interact with. Since the substances are unevenly distributed in the egg, when the fertilized egg divides, the resulting cells are different from the start and so can be qualitatively different in their own gene activity.
The substances that Gross studied are maternal messenger RNA’s—products of certain of the maternal genes"


Hope this helps.
BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1212
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separated an inver  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jun 2017, 05:25
5
1. It can be inferred from the passage that the morphogenetic determinants present in the early embryo are
(A) located in the nucleus of the embryo cells -It is the opposite of what the passage states. The passage states that these are present in the cytoplasm, which is outside the nucleus.
(B) evenly distributed unless the embryo is not developing normally - The are not homogeneous in distribution
(C) inactive until the embryo cells become irreversibly committed to their final function -No such thing stated
(D) identical to those that were already present in the unfertilized egg -This means to say that a new set of determinents were generated which are identical to those present in the cell earlier. This is completely absurd.
(E) present in larger quantities than is necessary for the development of a single individual -CORRECT. When the cells divide they still are able to develop.


2. The main topic of the passage is
(A) the early development of embryos of lower marine organisms - Wrong due to highlighted part of option. Nowhere its stated.
(B) the main contribution of modern embryology to molecular biology - No such thing stated in the passage.
(C) the role of molecular biology in disproving older theories of embryonic development - The molecular biology doesn't disprove anything.
(D) cell determination as an issue in the study of embryonic development - CORRECT. "Later biologists found that the situation was not so simple. It matters in which plane the embryo is cut. If it is cut in a plane different from the one used by the early investigators, it will not form two whole embryos. Which embryo cells are determined" - This part states the complete picture of the entire passage
(E) scientific dogma as a factor in the recent debate over the value of molecular biology -Irrelevant


3. According to the passage, when biologists believed that the cells in the early embryo were undetermined, they made which of the following mistakes?
(A) They did not attempt to replicate the original experiment of separating an embryo into two parts. -Irrelevant
(B) They did not realize that there was a connection between the issue of cell determination and the outcome of the separation experiment. -They did realise this
(C) They assumed that the results of experiments on embryos did not depend on the particular animal species used for such experiments. -Irrelevant
(D) They assumed that it was crucial to perform the separation experiment at an early stage in the embryo’s life. They did realise this
(E) They assumed that different ways of separating an embryo into two parts would be equivalent as far as the fate of the two parts was concerned. -CORRECT. They initially did this mistake, because when they came to know that cutting the cell in different ways will lead to different outcomes, they realised there are different ways to cut the cells, and each way won't result in equivalent fate.


4. It can be inferred from the passage that the initial production of histones after an egg is fertilized takes place
(A) in the cytoplasm -CORRECT. The determinants can be found in cytoplasm. RNA, being a determinent, was initially present in cytoplasm. Therefore histones should be in the cytoplasm initially
(B) in the maternal genes -wrong
(C) throughout the protoplasm -wrong
(D) in the beaded portions of the DNA strings -wrong
(E) in certain sections of the cell nucleus -wrong


5. It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following is dependent on the fertilization of an egg?
(A) Copying of maternal genes to produce maternal messenger RNA’s -RNA are products of maternal genes.
(B) Synthesis of proteins called histones -CORRECT. When the eggs are unfertilised, the determinents are inactive. When the eggs fertilize the determinents get into action by synthesis of histones
(C) Division of a cell into its nucleus and the cytoplasm -Wrong
(D) Determination of the egg cell’s potential for division -The cells' seperation potential is not given anywhere
(E) Generation of all of a cell’s morphogenetic determinants -These determinants are already present in the cell


6. According to the passage, the morphogenetic determinants present in the unfertilized egg cell are which of the following?
(A) Proteins bound to the nucleus -Wrong
(B) Histones -Wrong
(C) Maternal messenger RNA’s -CORRECT
(D) Cytoplasm -Wrong
(E) No beaded intervening DNA -Wrong
_________________

Kudos if my post helps!

Long And A Fruitful Journey - V21 to V41; If I can, So Can You!!
Preparing for RC my way
RC Summary Activity - New Project to imporve RC Skills
Bloomberg's US Bschool Ranking

My study resources:
1. Useful Formulae, Concepts and Tricks-Quant | 2. e-GMAT's ALL SC Compilation | 3. LSAT RC compilation | 4. Actual LSAT CR collection by Broal | 5. QOTD RC (Carcass) | 6. Challange OG RC | 7. GMAT Prep Challenge RC

CR & LSAT Forum Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Studying for the LSAT -- Corruptus in Extremis
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 489
Location: United States (MA)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Reviews Badge
Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separated an inver  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Oct 2017, 07:35
GMATNinja,

How are we supposed to determine who the target audience is for this paper? I have never come across a question like this, and I find the answer perplexing. This could have been directed at any audience.

My gripe with the answer E is that we are forced to assume these students are not freshmen with a high school level background.

Any help on this would be greatly appreciated!
_________________

D-Day: November 18th, 2017

Need a laugh and a break? Go here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/mental-break-funny-videos-270269.html

Need a CR tutor? PM me!

Senior SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1319
Location: Malaysia
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separated an inver  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Dec 2017, 07:26
It is taken from this article.
Attachments

Developmental Biology Where Is It Going.pdf [852.59 KiB]
Downloaded 53 times

To download please login or register as a user


_________________

"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Rules for posting in verbal forum | Please DO NOT post short answer in your post!

Advanced Search : https://gmatclub.com/forum/advanced-search/

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Posts: 102
Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separated an inver  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Apr 2018, 17:42
PUNEETSCHDV wrote:
@ anshunadir

and target audience is like tone of passage. find tone and also check key words like so many scientific terms used here. . the tone is just informing, there are no sides to take at all, nothing to criticize or nothing to support. its just knowledge sharing . some knowledge being given to a person interested in this subject. we are down to B and E. I eliminated B because scientists specializing in subject will be already knowing all this but this looks nice like a lecture to students. just a brief introduction before a lesson on subject. so E. other options are easily eliminated. kindly revert back if u have doubt with any of those ??


why not option D in this case (question 1) ...

Would option D cater to folks who want to learn about "new species" ...this too me sounds like new embroyos
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 28 Mar 2018
Posts: 45
Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separated an inver  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Apr 2018, 13:31
jabhatta@umail.iu.edu wrote:
PUNEETSCHDV wrote:
@ anshunadir

and target audience is like tone of passage. find tone and also check key words like so many scientific terms used here. . the tone is just informing, there are no sides to take at all, nothing to criticize or nothing to support. its just knowledge sharing . some knowledge being given to a person interested in this subject. we are down to B and E. I eliminated B because scientists specializing in subject will be already knowing all this but this looks nice like a lecture to students. just a brief introduction before a lesson on subject. so E. other options are easily eliminated. kindly revert back if u have doubt with any of those ??


why not option D in this case (question 1) ...

Would option D cater to folks who want to learn about "new species" ...this too me sounds like new embroyos


If you've ever read a published scientific study you'll know that scientist to scientist communication is typically written in a way that is all but incomprehensible to the layman. This passage is clearly educational in nature and the overview of the topic given is overly broad for an audience that would already be familiar with it. If the intended audience were molecular biologists there would be no need to explain what a morphogenetic determinant is for example, because that audience would already know.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 10 Aug 2009
Posts: 65
Reviews Badge
Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separated an inver  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jun 2018, 15:02
RonPurewal , GMATNinja could you please advise how to approach such passages. I got only three right even though I read it very carefully.
_________________

Retaking gmat for second time, any re-takers please feel free to connect.

GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
S
Joined: 20 Nov 2016
Posts: 253
Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separated an inver  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jul 2018, 09:15
ravikumarmishra wrote:
RonPurewal , GMATNinja could you please advise how to approach such passages. I got only three right even though I read it very carefully.

ravikumarmishra, if you haven't already, check out the Ultimate RC Guide for Beginners, and try applying those concepts to this passage (i.e. reading for structure and purpose).

If you have any specific questions, feel free to use the request verbal experts' reply button.

Good luck!
_________________

www.gmatninja.com

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Posts: 14
CAT Tests
Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separated an inver  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Feb 2019, 03:21
VeritasPrepKarishma,
Could you please explain Q6 and the choices.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separated an inver   [#permalink] 24 Feb 2019, 03:21

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 35 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separated an inver

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.