Quote:
Tell me, and I've brought this point up quite often in my posts here, is the whole point of an MBA to get a job with McK or Google?
For me, yes, and that on an international basis, too.
Quote:
And I find it slightly ridiculous to insinuate that a program that one has never heard of cannot be a quality one. It's like saying a small liberal arts college you've never heard of can't give you as good, if not better, an undergraduate education as the Ivy League - which is certainly not true.
As this was apparently aimed at me, I beg to differ

. As I want to go into consulting I need to put myself into the shoes of the recruiting people of my possible future employers. And there is one aspect that is really simple in consulting in my home country: If they havent heard of the school where you got your MBA, they might not even invite you to interview. End of story. So yes, it IS important to go to a program that is know. Brand Awareness is everything in this market. Although the inherent quality of a small unknown program might be there, no doubt.
Do you know what I mean?
solaris1
I haven't spent time looking at the numbers more closely, but I suspect the "top" US Schools lose out significantly on the following:
Women board: 1%
International faculty: 4%
International student: 4% I think a lot of the European schools have more than half their classes feature international students?
International board: 2%
International mobility: 6%
International experience: 2%
Language: 2% Is there any school that has a second language requirement - The Wharton Lauder program notwithstanding? You re most certainly right about that. Looking at the number US schools lose on this terms, although I agree with kry in saying that the American population is so diverse that even though people are considered nationals, the ethnic backgrounds are still offering variety.