Last visit was: 10 Jul 2025, 06:39 It is currently 10 Jul 2025, 06:39
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
sanchitbhatia
Joined: 25 Jun 2014
Last visit: 28 Apr 2015
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
59
 [18]
Given Kudos: 9
Posts: 15
Kudos: 59
 [18]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
16
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
[email protected]
Joined: 01 Aug 2014
Last visit: 20 Aug 2014
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
10
 [2]
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 5
Kudos: 10
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
abhyudaya007
Joined: 29 Jul 2013
Last visit: 28 Jan 2018
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
16
 [1]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 620 Q44 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
GPA: 3.9
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
Posts: 26
Kudos: 16
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
dream21
Joined: 06 Jan 2014
Last visit: 16 Jan 2019
Posts: 46
Own Kudos:
50
 [1]
Given Kudos: 79
Posts: 46
Kudos: 50
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Though not a good Quality Question.

E seems the closest.
New, strong varieties of antibiotics show the potential to kill a harmful bacterium without the unintended effects of X and Y, which were unintended effects of earlier high-strength varieties.

I do share the concern with the usage of which in option E.
avatar
sanchitbhatia
Joined: 25 Jun 2014
Last visit: 28 Apr 2015
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
59
 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Posts: 15
Kudos: 59
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
abhyudaya007
I have serious doubts about this question or the OA so to say. The answer choice is clearly between D and E. In D and E parallelism is achieved by comparing a 'complex-gerund' with a noun. Note simple gerund is not parallel with a noun.
D seems wrong because of "...that were required by.." . Technically that shall refer to bacteria, but its the development and killing of bacteria that were required by earlier high strength varieties.

E is incorrect because of the 'which' used. A which definitely modifies the word preceding it, not the whole phrase. So 'which' here effectively modifies bacteria, changing the intended meaning of author.

EXPERTS please post your views on it and let me know if you find any flaw in my line of thinking.
Thanks


Agree with you about usage of "which" in E....but this is the OA as per Kaplan
avatar
anaccident
Joined: 12 Jul 2014
Last visit: 26 Oct 2014
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 65
Posts: 22
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Pretty sure this is testing meaning, not that/which

There's nothing grammatically wrong with D but the choice does 2 things that changes meaning.
1. It took out the information that killing benign bacteria and resistant strains were unintended effects
2. It then replaces it by saying that it was "required", which has different implications, as in the antibiotics were designed with the deliberate purpose of killing benign bacteria and to develop resistant strains.
avatar
Ankura123
Joined: 08 Sep 2014
Last visit: 08 Jul 2015
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 1
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
abhyudaya007
I have serious doubts about this question or the OA so to say. The answer choice is clearly between D and E. In D and E parallelism is achieved by comparing a 'complex-gerund' with a noun. Note simple gerund is not parallel with a noun.
D seems wrong because of "...that were required by.." . Technically that shall refer to bacteria, but its the development and killing of bacteria that were required by earlier high strength varieties.

E is incorrect because of the 'which' used. A which definitely modifies the word preceding it, not the whole phrase. So 'which' here effectively modifies bacteria, changing the intended meaning of author.

EXPERTS please post your views on it and let me know if you find any flaw in my line of thinking.
Thanks


Though I agree with you on the comparison part:
"The killing of benign bacteria" is indeed a complex gerund as it uses <article (a,the)> + <gerund> + <of preposition>. This construct can be treated as a noun that is being compared to another noun "the development of...". The parallelism is taken care of by this option.

Usage of which:
In my opinion, while is correctly used in this sentence; it has been treated as a subordinate (modifier) clause.
Subordinate clause:
Must begin with a connecting word (usually which or because) <tick>
should be a sentence fragment <tick> since it cannot stand on its own.
it does not effect the intent/meaning of the main clause. (does not contain main sub or verb) <tick>

'without...' is a verb modifier that starts with a preposition and the 'which...' clause when it's being treated as subordinate clause, gives information/ detail about it,hence 'which...' is placed correctly (adverb modifying 'without...' phrase, placed next to modifier).
avatar
abhyudaya007
Joined: 29 Jul 2013
Last visit: 28 Jan 2018
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 620 Q44 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
GPA: 3.9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ankura123
abhyudaya007
I have serious doubts about this question or the OA so to say. The answer choice is clearly between D and E. In D and E parallelism is achieved by comparing a 'complex-gerund' with a noun. Note simple gerund is not parallel with a noun.
D seems wrong because of "...that were required by.." . Technically that shall refer to bacteria, but its the development and killing of bacteria that were required by earlier high strength varieties.

E is incorrect because of the 'which' used. A which definitely modifies the word preceding it, not the whole phrase. So 'which' here effectively modifies bacteria, changing the intended meaning of author.

EXPERTS please post your views on it and let me know if you find any flaw in my line of thinking.
Thanks


Though I agree with you on the comparison part:
"The killing of benign bacteria" is indeed a complex gerund as it uses <article (a,the)> + <gerund> + <of preposition>. This construct can be treated as a noun that is being compared to another noun "the development of...". The parallelism is taken care of by this option.

Usage of which:
In my opinion, while is correctly used in this sentence; it has been treated as a subordinate (modifier) clause.
Subordinate clause:
Must begin with a connecting word (usually which or because) <tick>
should be a sentence fragment <tick> since it cannot stand on its own.
it does not effect the intent/meaning of the main clause. (does not contain main sub or verb) <tick>

'without...' is a verb modifier that starts with a preposition and the 'which...' clause when it's being treated as subordinate clause, gives information/ detail about it,hence 'which...' is placed correctly (adverb modifying 'without...' phrase, placed next to modifier).


Exactly what I thought Ankura! The complex gerunds before and after the 'and' (the killing of and the development ) are ultimately parts of a noun phrase. They arent noun themselves. I referred to the Manhattan SC guide they explicitly state that 'which' is to be used only to modify a NOUN immediately preceeding it. But the book also rightly mentioned that even GMAT makes the same mistake of modifying and entire clause with a 'which' in its own RC passages, something that even I noticed. So chances are KAPLAN goofed this SC up. The real GMAT would never be this ambiguous. So I think we should no longer bother about this question.

Cheers! :)
avatar
cs2209
Joined: 03 Feb 2014
Last visit: 10 Mar 2017
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 82
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V35
WE:Operations (Manufacturing)
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V35
Posts: 21
Kudos: 50
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Based on the meaning, what the sentence is trying to convey is that new variety is better as it provides cure without the unintended side effects that were caused by earlier varieties. E makes this very clear, while all A, B, C and D have the same error of not making it clear that the side effects were caused by earlier varieties.
User avatar
AndyNeedsGMAT
Joined: 11 Oct 2012
Last visit: 26 Nov 2020
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 74
GMAT 1: 610 Q42 V32
Products:
GMAT 1: 610 Q42 V32
Posts: 28
Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sanchitbhatia
New, strong varieties of antibiotics show the potential to kill a harmful bacterium without the unintended effects of killing benign bacteria and development of resistant strains of bacteria by earlier high-strength varieties.

killing of benign bacteria and development of resistant strains of bacteria, which were unintended effects of earlier high-strength varieties


Can someone pls explain ? Is it not that which always modifies the noun immediately preceding it ?
If that is the case then which modifies 'bacteria' ... Pls help.
User avatar
PathFinder007
Joined: 10 Mar 2014
Last visit: 21 Oct 2018
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 13
Posts: 132
Kudos: 715
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sanchitbhatia
New, strong varieties of antibiotics show the potential to kill a harmful bacterium without the unintended effects of killing benign bacteria and development of resistant strains of bacteria by earlier high-strength varieties.

unintended effects of killing benign bacteria and the development of resistant strains of bacteria by earlier high-strength varieties

unintended effects by earlier high-strength varieties of development of resistant strains and killing benign bacteria

unintended effects for the development of resistant strains of bacteria and killing benign bacteria of earlier high-strength varieties

development of resistant strains of bacteria and killing of benign bacteria that were required by earlier high-strength varieties

killing of benign bacteria and development of resistant strains of bacteria, which were unintended effects of earlier high-strength varieties


mikemcgarry

could you please provide your comments on this. how option E can be right here.
I think use of which is not right here. please clarify

Thanks
avatar
andy2502
Joined: 16 Jul 2015
Last visit: 10 May 2018
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 31
Location: India
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
GPA: 3.4
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
Posts: 19
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sanchitbhatia
New, strong varieties of antibiotics show the potential to kill a harmful bacterium without the unintended effects of killing benign bacteria and development of resistant strains of bacteria by earlier high-strength varieties.

unintended effects of killing benign bacteria and the development of resistant strains of bacteria by earlier high-strength varieties

unintended effects by earlier high-strength varieties of development of resistant strains and killing benign bacteria

unintended effects for the development of resistant strains of bacteria and killing benign bacteria of earlier high-strength varieties

development of resistant strains of bacteria and killing of benign bacteria that were required by earlier high-strength varieties

killing of benign bacteria and development of resistant strains of bacteria, which were unintended effects of earlier high-strength varieties

OA is Correct. Below is my take:

New, strong varieties of antibiotics show the potential to kill a harmful bacterium without the:
killing of benign bacteria and
development of resistant strains of bacteria
(both of), which were unintended effects of earlier high-strength varieties
Here there is no Parallelism Issue.
Parallel marker is : And
Killing of benign .. (Verb-ing of Noun) is parallel to development (Noun). This is one of the special case of parallelism and is very much acceptable in GMAT.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,444
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,444
Kudos: 953
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7349 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts