yuktiiii
What is the answer given here?
hello, the answer is B.
fellows, I got enough from that hardest field. I predicted that I may not answer correctly, but what depresses me is that none of the explanations are cogent. I got a new one:
For several centuries there have been hairless dogs in western Mexico and in coastal Peru. It is very unlikely that a trait as rare as hairlessness emerged on two separate occasions. Since the dogs have never existed in the wild, and the vast mountainous jungle separating these two regions would have made overland travel between them extremely difficult centuries ago, the dogs must have been transported from one of these regions to the other by boat, probably during trading expeditions.
Which one of the following is an assumption that the argument requires?
A. Hairless dogs have never been found anywhere except in the regions of western Mexico and coastal Peru.
B. Most of the trade goods that came into western Mexico centuries ago were transported by boat.
C. Centuries ago, no one would have travelled between western Mexico and coastal Peru by boat except for the purposes of carrying out a trading expedition.
D. IF hairless dogs were at one time transported between western Mexico and coastal Peru by boat, they were traded in exchange for other goods.
E. Centuries ago, it was easier to travel by boat between western Mexico and coastal Peru than to travel by an overland route.
The correct answer is E. but the answer given, for example the first comment: A. Hairless dogs have never been found anywhere except in the regions of western Mexico and coastal Peru. - argument is about transport of the dogs from one region to the other, the existence of dogs in other regions doesn’t affect the conclusion. Incorrect. E. Centuries ago, it was easier to travel by boat between western Mexico and coastal Peru than to travel by an overland route. - If we reverse this it says " It was harder to travel by boat than to travel by land", since it is already hard to travel by land, travel by boat would be then even harder, thus making the conclusion weak & quite unlikely. Hence this is the correct answer.