Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 0410:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
What does test anxiety really look like on the GMAT? For many test takers, it does not look like a panic attack. Instead, it shows up as brain fog, rereading, negative comparisons, mental noise....
Sep 0201:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Take 30% off all study plans with code COURSEWORK - Expires on Monday 9/7
Sep 0401:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
This Labor Day, turn your hard work into real score gains. From 615→715 in 15 days to 705 in 30 days, our students prove what's possible with personalized, expert guidance. Save up to 25% on 1-on-1 tutoring.
Sep 0609:30 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EST
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.- Sep 07
12:01 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
On the 7th, GMAT Club Tests will be Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PDT 
Sep 0712:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Tejas studied hard but kept repeating the same mistakes. After 3 attempts at 645, a focused 4-week strategy helped him identify and fix what was holding him back—leading to a 695 with just 12–15 hours of study per week.- Sep 07
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
A complete walkthrough of GMAT Club’s free 12-week GMAT study plan: what you study each week, how progress and goals are tracked, how the error log works, and how your practice unlocks paid tools at no cost. - Sep 09
07:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway - Sep 09
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Three MBA applications. Three rejections. No interview invites. A year later, Aman was admitted to Cambridge Judge, SMU, and IMD. In this episode of MBA Admit Stories, Aman shares how he rebuilt his MBA application... 
Sep 1008:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2108:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
No ambitious politician will challenge an elected public official running for reelection unless that official appears vulnerable. Nonetheless, public officials who do not appear vulnerable as they attempt to win reelection rarely run unopposed.
If the statements given are true, which of the following is a conclusion that can be properly drawn from them?
A. No officeholder who is vulnerable will run for reelection if an ambitious politician is likely to challenge that officeholder.
B. If a person who is not an ambitious politician challenges an elected public official who is running for reelection, then that official does not appear vulnerable.
C. If an elected official running for reelection appears vulnerable, that official's challengers will all be ambitious politicians.
D. Some elected officials running for reelection are challenged by people who are not ambitious politicians.
E. Ambitious politicians will nun for election to a public office only if the holder of that office is running for reelection and appears to be vulnerable.
If the statements given are true, which of the following is a conclusion that can be properly drawn from them?
A. No officeholder who is vulnerable will run for reelection if an ambitious politician is likely to challenge that officeholder.
B. If a person who is not an ambitious politician challenges an elected public official who is running for reelection, then that official does not appear vulnerable.
C. If an elected official running for reelection appears vulnerable, that official's challengers will all be ambitious politicians.
D. Some elected officials running for reelection are challenged by people who are not ambitious politicians.
E. Ambitious politicians will nun for election to a public office only if the holder of that office is running for reelection and appears to be vulnerable.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
wadhwakaran
Joined: 31 Mar 2022
Last visit: 22 Jul 2025
Posts: 257
Given Kudos: 19
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, International Business
Schools: INSEAD Aug'24 intake Oxford Said'25 Judge '25 Imperial'25 HEC Sep'24 Intake LBS '26 ISB '27
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V35
GPA: 2.8
Products:
Schools: INSEAD Aug'24 intake Oxford Said'25 Judge '25 Imperial'25 HEC Sep'24 Intake LBS '26 ISB '27
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V35
Posts: 257
13 Jan 2023, 03:44
Kudos
Bookmarks
No ambitious politician will challenge an elected public official running for reelection unless that official appears vulnerable.
If an official is not vulnerable, he will not be challenged by ambitious politician.
Nonetheless, public officials who do not appear vulnerable as they attempt to win reelection rarely run unopposed.
Officials who are not vulnerable are mostly challanged by someone
A. No officeholder who is vulnerable will run for reelection if an ambitious politician is likely to challenge that officeholder. Cannot be inferred
B. If a person who is not an ambitious politician challenges an elected public official who is running for reelection, then that official does not appear vulnerable. We cannot infer this from the given conditional
Not Vulnerable ---> No Challenge
Challenge --> Vulnerable
C. If an elected official running for reelection appears vulnerable, that official's challengers will all be ambitious politicians. Maybe there are few non-ambitious politicians who are challenging this official
D. Some elected officials running for reelection are challenged by people who are not ambitious politicians. True because some officials who are vulnerable are challenged by ambitious and some are challanged by non-ambitious. However, the remaining officials go unchallenged.
E. Ambitious politicians will run for election to a public office only if the holder of that office is running for reelection and appears to be vulnerable. 'and' is problematic here
Posted from my mobile device
If an official is not vulnerable, he will not be challenged by ambitious politician.
Nonetheless, public officials who do not appear vulnerable as they attempt to win reelection rarely run unopposed.
Officials who are not vulnerable are mostly challanged by someone
A. No officeholder who is vulnerable will run for reelection if an ambitious politician is likely to challenge that officeholder. Cannot be inferred
B. If a person who is not an ambitious politician challenges an elected public official who is running for reelection, then that official does not appear vulnerable. We cannot infer this from the given conditional
Not Vulnerable ---> No Challenge
Challenge --> Vulnerable
C. If an elected official running for reelection appears vulnerable, that official's challengers will all be ambitious politicians. Maybe there are few non-ambitious politicians who are challenging this official
D. Some elected officials running for reelection are challenged by people who are not ambitious politicians. True because some officials who are vulnerable are challenged by ambitious and some are challanged by non-ambitious. However, the remaining officials go unchallenged.
E. Ambitious politicians will run for election to a public office only if the holder of that office is running for reelection and appears to be vulnerable. 'and' is problematic here
Posted from my mobile device
13 Jan 2023, 04:14
Kudos
Bookmarks
E is incorrect
"No ambitious politician will challenge an elected public official running for reelection unless that official appears vulnerable" implies No ambitious politicians will challenge if EPO is vulnerable but what if EPO is vulnerable, then it is the choice of ambitious politicians to run for election or not
A-> B, doesn't mean B -> A
"No ambitious politician will challenge an elected public official running for reelection unless that official appears vulnerable" implies No ambitious politicians will challenge if EPO is vulnerable but what if EPO is vulnerable, then it is the choice of ambitious politicians to run for election or not
A-> B, doesn't mean B -> A
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
