Last visit was: 12 Jun 2025, 18:13 It is currently 12 Jun 2025, 18:13
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
perfectstranger
Joined: 17 Jul 2008
Last visit: 27 May 2013
Posts: 139
Own Kudos:
4,628
 [167]
Given Kudos: 28
Posts: 139
Kudos: 4,628
 [167]
16
Kudos
Add Kudos
150
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
gixxer1000
Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Last visit: 05 Aug 2009
Posts: 359
Own Kudos:
393
 [23]
Concentration: Real Estate Development
Schools:Stern, McCombs, Marshall, Wharton
 Q42  V35
Posts: 359
Kudos: 393
 [23]
14
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 12 Jun 2025
Posts: 7,324
Own Kudos:
68,211
 [21]
Given Kudos: 1,942
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,324
Kudos: 68,211
 [21]
17
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 12 Jun 2025
Posts: 16,040
Own Kudos:
73,632
 [8]
Given Kudos: 472
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,040
Kudos: 73,632
 [8]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
perfectstranger
Not all life depends on energy from sunlight. Microbial life has been found in bedrock more than five kilometers below the surface of the Earth, and bacteria have been found on the deep ocean floor feeding on hydrogen and other gases rising from the interior of the Earth through vents in the ocean floor.

The statements above, if true, best support which of the following as a conclusion?


(A) The location in the bedrock where microbial life was found was not near a system of volcanic vents through which hydrogen and other gases rose from the interior of the Earth.

(B) Bacteria are able to exist at the molten center of the Earth.

(C) A thorough survey of a planet's surface is insufficient to establish beyond a doubt that the planet contains no life.

(D) Life probably exists on Sun-orbiting comets, which are cold agglomerations of space dust and frozen gases.

(E) Finding bacterial remains in coal and oil would establish that the bacteria had been feeding on substances that had not been produced from the energy of sunlight.

Not all life depends on energy from sunlight.
Microbial life has been found in bedrock more than five kilometers below the surface of the Earth,
Bacteria have been found on the deep ocean floor feeding on hydrogen and other gases rising from the interior of the Earth through vents in the ocean floor.

So the main idea is that life can thrive on other energy resources too. It doesn't necessarily need sunlight.

We need a conclusion.

(A) The location in the bedrock where microbial life was found was not near a system of volcanic vents through which hydrogen and other gases rose from the interior of the Earth.

We cannot conclude that the bedrock was not near volcanic vents. Nothing in our premises support that.

(B) Bacteria are able to exist at the molten center of the Earth.

Nothing is mentioned about molten centre of the Earth. We don't know if the parameters on the centre allow life to survive.

(C) A thorough survey of a planet's surface is insufficient to establish beyond a doubt that the planet contains no life.

Correct. The premises tell us that that life can survive in the deep interiors of the planet too that don't get sunlight. This implies that a survey of the planet surface is not enough to say whether the planet contains life. It may be that life survives deep inside the planet.

(D) Life probably exists on Sun-orbiting comets, which are cold agglomerations of space dust and frozen gases.

Nothing in the premises tell us that life probably exists on cold agglomerations. All we know is that sunlight is not necessary. But there may be other things that are necessary but these cold agglomerations do not have.

(E) Finding bacterial remains in coal and oil would establish that the bacteria had been feeding on substances that had not been produced from the energy of sunlight.

Finding bacterial remains (not bacteria, their remains) in coal and oil tells us nothing about those bacteria when they were alive. What if these bacteria were living on the surface on leaves and died there itself. Finally when the plants fell into the earth, they converted into coal over millions on years. Upon extraction of that coal, finding bacteria remains does not tell us that the bacteria were not feeding on sunlight. We do not know how the remains came into the coal. We cannot say using our argument that finding bacterial remains in coal would establish anything.

Answer (C)
General Discussion
User avatar
zonk
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 12 Jul 2008
Last visit: 10 Nov 2013
Posts: 366
Own Kudos:
346
 [3]
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship, Health Care
Schools:Wharton
 Q50  V44
Posts: 366
Kudos: 346
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
perfectstranger
Not all life depends on energy from sunlight. Microbial life has been found in bedrock more than five kilometers below the surface of the Earth, and bacteria have been found on the deep ocean floor feeding on hydrogen and other gases rising from the interior of the Earth through vents in the ocean floor.

The statements above, if true, best support which of the following as a conclusion?

(A) The location in the bedrock where microbial life was found was not near a system of volcanic vents through which hydrogen and other gases rose from the interior of the Earth.

(B) Bacteria are able to exist at the molten center of the Earth.

(C) A thorough survey of a planet's surface is insufficient to establish beyond a doubt that the planet contains no life.

(D) Life probably exists on Sun-orbiting comets, which are cold agglomerations of space dust and frozen gases.

(E) Finding bacterial remains in coal and oil would establish that the bacteria had been feeding on substances that had not been produced from the energy of sunlight.

Clear C.

A. Don't know anything about volcanic vents
B. Don't know anything about molten center of Earth
C. Correct -- Bacteria has been found well below the surface of the Earth
D. Probably is too strong -- Passage gives no sense of probability
E. The bacteria itself does not need direct sunlight but could be feeding on sunlight-produced substances that trickled down from the Earth's surface
User avatar
spriya
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Last visit: 18 Nov 2010
Posts: 617
Own Kudos:
3,021
 [7]
Posts: 617
Kudos: 3,021
 [7]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Not all life depends on energy from sunlight. Microbial life has been found in bedrock more than five kilometers below the surface of the Earth, and bacteria have been found on the deep ocean floor feeding on hydrogen and other gases rising from the interior of the Earth through vents in the ocean floor.

The statements above, if true, best support which of the following as a conclusion?

(A) The location in the bedrock where microbial life was found was not near a system of volcanic vents through which hydrogen and other gases rose from the interior of the Earth. -> this is incorrect as conclution since it does not present the main point of not all life depends on sunlight

(B) Bacteria are able to exist at the molten center of the Earth. -> this is just an evidence not a conclution

(C) A thorough survey of a planet's surface is insufficient to establish beyond a doubt that the planet contains no life. -> this is apt since from the above passage we know main point is not all life depends o sunlight and evidences are of microbes,bacteria.Hence just looking at surface species presence we cannot comment on life on a planet .deep oceans and underneath earth need to be looked into

(D) Life probably exists on Sun-orbiting comets, which are cold agglomerations of space dust and frozen gases. -> OOS

(E) Finding bacterial remains in coal and oil would establish that the bacteria had been feeding on substances that had not been produced from the energy of sunlight. -> Just an evidence
avatar
jainmay
Joined: 03 Feb 2012
Last visit: 18 Dec 2018
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My take: E

Conclusion is " Not all life depends on energy from sunlight" and as per Powerscore Bible, the answer to this question should be related to the conclusion.
Option E, clearly supports that bacteria's have been found in coal and oil and do not require energy from sunlight...

Please correct me if i am wrong... :)
User avatar
TGC
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Last visit: 19 Jul 2017
Posts: 582
Own Kudos:
3,476
 [1]
Given Kudos: 322
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE:Information Technology (Finance: Investment Banking)
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
Posts: 582
Kudos: 3,476
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OA:C (as per OG11)

Initially I chose (E).However, I was mislead to the answer as choice (C) clearly states that just surveying the surface for existence of life is wrong.Nevertheless, option (C) indirectly states the conclusion that is mentioned in the first line of the given passage.

(C). Some life exists even under the surface => Just surveying surface won't do=> Not all life depends on energy from sunlight.

Hope it helps

Rgds,
TGC !!
User avatar
ConnectTheDots
Joined: 28 Apr 2012
Last visit: 06 May 2020
Posts: 239
Own Kudos:
999
 [8]
Given Kudos: 142
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 2: 770 Q50 V47
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jainmay
My take: E

Conclusion is " Not all life depends on energy from sunlight" and as per Powerscore Bible, the answer to this question should be related to the conclusion.
Option E, clearly supports that bacteria's have been found in coal and oil and do not require energy from sunlight...

Please correct me if i am wrong... :)

E strengthens the argument. Conclusion should either summarize what is stated in the premises or use the premises as facts to prove a point. E serves as an evidence to support the fact "Not all life depends on energy from sunlight".

C is correct here. It captures the essence of the premises. Since organisms have been found to survive beyond the surface of earth, it could be the case of any other planet as well. Hence, a survey on the surface of any planet is insufficient to ascertain the non-existence of life in that planet.
User avatar
anbknaga
Joined: 27 Aug 2018
Last visit: 12 Jun 2024
Posts: 93
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 52
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Healthcare
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31
WE:Operations (Healthcare/Pharmaceuticals)
Products:
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31
Posts: 93
Kudos: 81
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja, can you please explain the meaning of 'C', how to interpret it and why is it the correct answer? Why is the thorough survey insufficient?
Also why is option 'D' wrong? Is it because we can't be sure if the life on those orbits is subjected to sunlight or not? Also would love to hear your take on how to understand the entire argument.
avatar
Sejal16
Joined: 20 Dec 2019
Last visit: 23 Dec 2020
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 64
Location: India
Schools: ISB'22 (I)
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
Schools: ISB'22 (I)
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
Posts: 58
Kudos: 34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GmatNinja can u help with elimination of option B ? If "Bacteria are able to exist at the molten center of the Earth" then it supports the conclusion that sunlight is not essential.
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 12 Jun 2025
Posts: 4,597
Own Kudos:
32,266
 [1]
Given Kudos: 683
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,597
Kudos: 32,266
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sejal16
GmatNinja can u help with elimination of option B ? If "Bacteria are able to exist at the molten center of the Earth" then it supports the conclusion that sunlight is not essential.

Option B takes things to the other extreme which is neither suggested nor supported by the passage. Sure, it talks about 5km beneath the surface and ocean floors. But talking about existing at the earth's center is too much of an extrapolation to make.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 12 Jun 2025
Posts: 7,324
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,942
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,324
Kudos: 68,211
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sejal16
GmatNinja can u help with elimination of option B ? If "Bacteria are able to exist at the molten center of the Earth" then it supports the conclusion that sunlight is not essential.
Take a close look at the exact wording of the question:
Quote:
The statements above, if true, best support which of the following as a conclusion?
Here, we're not trying support a conclusion that's already part of the passage. Instead, we have to choose the answer choice that is supported BY the information in the passage.

The information in the passage doesn't support the conclusion that "bacteria are able to exist at the molten center of the Earth," so (B) is not the answer to this question. Take a look at this post for an explanation of the correct choice.

I hope that helps!
avatar
sahuanamika
Joined: 22 May 2021
Last visit: 05 Oct 2021
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
20
 [1]
Given Kudos: 107
Posts: 45
Kudos: 20
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Below are the main points:
Life does not depends on sunlight , examples:
1. Microbial life found under the surface of Earth.
2. Bacteria found on deep ocean
This tells us that life exists on surface (under sunlight), deep oceans(without sunlight) , interior of Earth

Choice:
(A) The location in the bedrock where microbial life was found was not near a system of volcanic vents through which hydrogen and other gases rose from the interior of the Earth.
-- Incorrect , as it does not talk about Volcanic vents

(B) Bacteria are able to exist at the molten center of the Earth.
-- Incorrect , as it does not talk about molten center , it has considered deep oceans and interior of earth.

(C) A thorough survey of a planet's surface is insufficient to establish beyond a doubt that the planet contains no life.
-- Correct , as it is actually telling us that life not only exists on surface, but also in deep oceans and interior of Earth where the sunlight is not present.

(D) Life probably exists on Sun-orbiting comets, which are cold agglomerations of space dust and frozen gases.
-- Incorrect out of scope , as it is not talking about comets.

(E) Finding bacterial remains in coal and oil would establish that the bacteria had been feeding on substances that had not been produced from the energy of sunlight.
-- Incorrect , we cannot infer that anything having bacterial remains is not produced from energy of sunlight. Also this is out of scope as it does not talk anything about substances produced or not produced by the energy of sunlight.
avatar
krittapat
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 23 Oct 2019
Last visit: 27 Jan 2023
Posts: 46
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3,515
Location: Thailand
Posts: 46
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
egmat VeritasKarishma GMATNinja GMATNinjatwo
Could you please explain why choice D and E are not the right one to select? What's wrong with each of them?
Appreciate your favor
User avatar
Basshead
Joined: 09 Jan 2020
Last visit: 07 Feb 2024
Posts: 927
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 432
Location: United States
Posts: 927
Kudos: 285
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
E is incorrect because we can't say finding bacterial remains in coal and oil would establish that bacteria had been feeding on substances that had not been produced from the energy of sunlight.

In the passage we're told that not all life depends on energy from sunlight. We're then given an example in which bacteria has been found where sunlight is absent.

Is it established that the bacteria had been feeding on substances that had not been produced from the energy of sunlight? No. Notice the passage doesn't mention anything about where the coal and oil is found -- we have to make a lot of assumptions for this choice to work.

C, on the other hand, is best supported by the information given in the passage: A thorough survey of a planet's surface is insufficient to establish beyond a doubt that the planet contains no life.
User avatar
100mitra
Joined: 29 Apr 2019
Last visit: 06 Jul 2022
Posts: 716
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 49
Status:Learning
Posts: 716
Kudos: 617
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Correct Option C

Conclusion: Not all life depends on energy from sunlight.
Premise - Microbial life has been found in bedrock more than five km below the surface of the Earth, and
Premise - Bacteria have been found on the deep ocean floor feeding on hydrogen and other gases rising from the interior of the Earth through vents in the ocean floor.
Argument: does really not all life depend only on energy from sun, there could be another some more source too.

The statements above, if true, best support which of the following as a conclusion?

(A) The location in the bedrock where microbial life was found was not near a system of volcanic vents
through which hydrogen and other gases rose from the interior of the Earth.
Wrong: Supports premise, not to conclusion

(B) Bacteria are able to exist at the molten centre of the Earth.
Wrong: Supports premise, not to conclusion

(C) A thorough survey of a planet's surface is insufficient to establish beyond a doubt that the planet contains no life.
Correct: this supports the conclusion, that some another organism could depend on other form of energy, which can be found in all location, like surface, bedrock, deep ocean and other location, where life is yet to be found

(D) Life probably exists on Sun-orbiting comets, which are cold agglomerations of space dust and frozen gases.
Wrong: Irrelevant, No information about it in passage

(E) Finding bacterial remains in coal and oil would establish that the bacteria had been feeding on substances that had not been produced from the energy of sunlight.
Wrong: Supports premise, not to conclusion
avatar
sankarvignesh
Joined: 20 Apr 2021
Last visit: 29 Dec 2021
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GPA: 3.9
WE:Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)
Posts: 9
Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasKarishma GMATNinja Can you please explain why E is wrong? E clearly supports the premise. How could it be wrong? I can see why c is correct. Please do explain.

Thanks
avatar
TarunKumar1234
Joined: 14 Jul 2020
Last visit: 28 Feb 2024
Posts: 1,108
Own Kudos:
1,335
 [1]
Given Kudos: 351
Location: India
Posts: 1,108
Kudos: 1,335
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Not all life depends on energy from sunlight. Microbial life has been found in bedrock more than five kilometers below the surface of the Earth, and bacteria have been found on the deep ocean floor feeding on hydrogen and other gases rising from the interior of the Earth through vents in the ocean floor.

The statements above, if true, best support which of the following as a conclusion?

(A) The location in the bedrock where microbial life was found was not near a system of volcanic vents through which hydrogen and other gases rose from the interior of the Earth. -> It is still irrelevant to conclusion. Incorrect.

(B) Bacteria are able to exist at the molten center of the Earth. -> Irrelevant again to conclusion. Incorrect.

(C) A thorough survey of a planet's surface is insufficient to establish beyond a doubt that the planet contains no life. -> Look at the word "insufficient". It means, by checking earth's surface, we can't conclude as there is no life at planet. It say's, life can exit below the surface, where sunlight doesn't reach. It makes sense.

(D) Life probably exists on Sun-orbiting comets, which are cold agglomerations of space dust and frozen gases. -> Life without sun energy is still untouched. Incorrect.

(E) Finding bacterial remains in coal and oil would establish that the bacteria had been feeding on substances that had not been produced from the energy of sunlight. -> This is an example, but still C is better, because, this option is not so direct to impact the conclusion. Incorrect.

So, I think C. :)
User avatar
Crytiocanalyst
Joined: 16 Jun 2021
Last visit: 27 May 2023
Posts: 953
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 309
Posts: 953
Kudos: 200
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
perfectstranger
Not all life depends on energy from sunlight. Microbial life has been found in bedrock more than five kilometers below the surface of the Earth, and bacteria have been found on the deep ocean floor feeding on hydrogen and other gases rising from the interior of the Earth through vents in the ocean floor.

The statements above, if true, best support which of the following as a conclusion?


(A) The location in the bedrock where microbial life was found was not near a system of volcanic vents through which hydrogen and other gases rose from the interior of the Earth.
It may or may not be the case we cannot decide therefore out

(B) Bacteria are able to exist at the molten center of the Earth.
We have no clue whether 5 km below we have molten substances therefore out

(C) A thorough survey of a planet's surface is insufficient to establish beyond a doubt that the planet contains no life.
Since we have found life elsewhere other than the surface the conclusion is therefore worth while therefore let us hang on to it

(D) Life probably exists on Sun-orbiting comets, which are cold agglomerations of space dust and frozen gases.
This is a far fetched conclusion this may or may not be true therefore out

(E) Finding bacterial remains in coal and oil would establish that the bacteria had been feeding on substances that had not been produced from the energy of sunlight.
There is a possibility that scientista are perfoming a experiment and they are the ones providing photovoltaic energy absence of a evidence doesn't favour in non-existence therefore out

Therefore IMO C
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7324 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts