Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 05:52 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 05:52

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Aug 2020
Posts: 252
Own Kudos [?]: 116 [0]
Given Kudos: 218
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 30 Mar 2021
Posts: 228
Own Kudos [?]: 192 [0]
Given Kudos: 93
Location: Turkey
GMAT 1: 720 Q51 V36
GPA: 3.69
Send PM
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4344
Own Kudos [?]: 30781 [1]
Given Kudos: 634
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6917
Own Kudos [?]: 63652 [0]
Given Kudos: 1773
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States [#permalink]
Expert Reply
gloomybison wrote:
Hi GMATNinja

What makes us think that in A "did" will reach back to the part after "and" and touch "gave"?

Can't we have all the following as true;
Not only did he steal the money and harass the kid but also bla bla
Not only did he steal the money and harassed the kid but also bla bla
Not only he stole the money and harassed the kid but also bla bla
Not only he stole the money and did harass the kid but also bla bla

"did" may or may not reach to other art of parallelism IMO
ıs that a writing rule that "did" if used in the beginning must reach to all other relevant verbs?

Thank you

Of the four examples you gave, only the first would be acceptable.

The second is wrong because the parallelism is off -- two parallel verbs should be interchangeable. But you clearly can't write, "Not did he harassed..."

The third and fourth examples contain a phrase ("not only he stole") that doesn't make sense. I could write, "He not only stole," in which case he performed some second action. But "not only he stole" is incorrect, partly because it isn't clear if someone else is also stealing or if "he" is doing something else.

Be careful about trying to create a rule here. It's true that if I wrote, "Not only did Tim x and y..." you'd expect the "did" to be applied to both x and y, but that's more a function of how parallelism works than about any rule regarding the usage of "did."

I hope that clears things up!
Director
Director
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Posts: 623
Own Kudos [?]: 31 [0]
Given Kudos: 21
Send PM
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States [#permalink]
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.

Option Elimination -

(A) Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also - the primary issue here is "did create" and "did gave." It has to be "give." Moreover, the construction of not only X but also Y places equal emphasis on both X and Y, while the construction of X but Y presents a contrast (It indicates that X is true or applicable, but Y presents an opposing or limiting factor.)

(B) Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also - "which" referring to "farmland" is not correct. Moreover, there is no subject after but. We need "it."

(C) The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland (especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also - No verb before "but."

(D) The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also - ok. We don't need "not only" before "but also." "but also," here is a deception (mainly "also") because if we over-rely on the rules, then we'll keep searching "not only," and there is a high probability we cross it off. This is a simple X but Y construction wherein X showcases the positives and Y as the negative factors.

(E) The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it - Now the subject is outside of the "not only," so it is applicable for both. But a repetition hereafter "but" is not required. It was required in A because the subject was hidden in the inverted structure after "not only," but here, it is clear and outside of "not only."
GMAT Club Bot
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States [#permalink]
   1   2   3   4 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne