Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 15:00 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 15:00
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
BLTN
Joined: 25 Aug 2020
Last visit: 19 Dec 2022
Posts: 227
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 215
Posts: 227
Kudos: 287
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 5,632
Own Kudos:
33,428
 [1]
Given Kudos: 707
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,632
Kudos: 33,428
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,129
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,793
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gloomybison
Hi GMATNinja

What makes us think that in A "did" will reach back to the part after "and" and touch "gave"?

Can't we have all the following as true;
Not only did he steal the money and harass the kid but also bla bla
Not only did he steal the money and harassed the kid but also bla bla
Not only he stole the money and harassed the kid but also bla bla
Not only he stole the money and did harass the kid but also bla bla

"did" may or may not reach to other art of parallelism IMO
ıs that a writing rule that "did" if used in the beginning must reach to all other relevant verbs?

Thank you
Of the four examples you gave, only the first would be acceptable.

The second is wrong because the parallelism is off -- two parallel verbs should be interchangeable. But you clearly can't write, "Not did he harassed..."

The third and fourth examples contain a phrase ("not only he stole") that doesn't make sense. I could write, "He not only stole," in which case he performed some second action. But "not only he stole" is incorrect, partly because it isn't clear if someone else is also stealing or if "he" is doing something else.

Be careful about trying to create a rule here. It's true that if I wrote, "Not only did Tim x and y..." you'd expect the "did" to be applied to both x and y, but that's more a function of how parallelism works than about any rule regarding the usage of "did."

I hope that clears things up!
User avatar
Raman109
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Last visit: 28 Jul 2025
Posts: 706
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 706
Kudos: 212
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.

Option Elimination -

(A) Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also - the primary issue here is "did create" and "did gave." It has to be "give." Moreover, the construction of not only X but also Y places equal emphasis on both X and Y, while the construction of X but Y presents a contrast (It indicates that X is true or applicable, but Y presents an opposing or limiting factor.)

(B) Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also - "which" referring to "farmland" is not correct. Moreover, there is no subject after but. We need "it."

(C) The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland (especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also - No verb before "but."

(D) The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also - ok. We don't need "not only" before "but also." "but also," here is a deception (mainly "also") because if we over-rely on the rules, then we'll keep searching "not only," and there is a high probability we cross it off. This is a simple X but Y construction wherein X showcases the positives and Y as the negative factors.

(E) The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it - Now the subject is outside of the "not only," so it is applicable for both. But a repetition hereafter "but" is not required. It was required in A because the subject was hidden in the inverted structure after "not only," but here, it is clear and outside of "not only."
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,404
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,404
Kudos: 1,009
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
   1   2   3   4 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
495 posts
358 posts