Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Join a FREE 1-day verbal workshop and learn how to ace the Verbal section with the best tips and strategies. Limited for the first 99 registrants. Register today!
Join a FREE live webinar with examPAL and Admissionado and learn how to master GMAT Critical Reasoning questions and the 6-pointed star of MBA application essay glory. Save your spot today!
We'll be posting questions in DS/PS/SC/CR in competition mode. Detailed and quickest solution will get kudos. Will be collecting new links to all questions in this topic. Here you can also check links to fresh questions posted.
Now that so much data travels via light—i.e., is carried in glass fibe
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 27 Sep 2018, 21:22
10
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
5% (low)
Question Stats:
87% (01:14) correct 13% (01:36) wrong based on 583 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Now that so much data travels via light—i.e., is carried in glass fibers rather than by electrical current—one goal of semiconductor research is to develop a silicon chip that can transmit and receive light signals directly, a development that mav one day lead to smaller, faster semiconductors.
A. to develop a silicon chip that can transmit and receive light signals directly, a development that may one day lead
B. to develop a silicon chip with the capability of transmitting and receiving light signals directly, which may one day lead
C. the development of a silicon chip that has the capability of transmitting and receiving light signals directly, a development maybe one day leading
D. developing a silicon chip that can transmit and receive light signals directly, which may one day lead
E. developing a silicon chip with the ability to transmit and receive light signals directly, with this development maybe one day leading
The issue I have here is that in A (OA), there is no || between one goal is to develop. Because of that I chose C, although A sounds much better. Could anybody clarify?
Re: Now that so much data travels via light—i.e., is carried in glass fibe
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jan 2012, 08:50
12
4
Hi,
Now that so much data travels via light—i.e., is carried in glass fibers rather than by electrical current—one goal of semiconductor research is to develop a silicon chip that can transmit and receive light signals directly, a development that mav one day lead to smaller, faster semiconductors.
1. Whenever we need to present the intent or the purpose (or the goal, as written in the sentence) of ant action, we use “to verb” form (infinitive). For example: Harry started this campaign to aware people of the ill effects of child labor. In this sentence, the purpose of starting the campaign is “to aware” people of something. Hence, “to verb” form has been used to show the intent. Similarly, the goal of the semiconductor research is “to develop” a better silicon chip. Hence, the purpose has been correctly denoted in “to verb form” (to develop). 2. Use of “that” clause is correct here because it clearly modifies the preceding noun “a silicon chip”, giving additional information about that chip. 3. “a development that may one day lead to smaller, faster semiconductors” – the structure of this portion of the sentence is – noun (a development) + noun modifier (that may one day lead to smaller, faster semiconductors). Now, noun + noun modifiers are very versatile. They can either modify the closest noun phrase (appositive modifier) or they can modify the entire preceding clause (absolute modifier). Whether a noun + noun modifier will modify the preceding noun phrase or the preceding clause depends upon the context of the sentence. In this sentence it does not make sense for the noun + noun modifier to modify the closest noun phrase “light signals”. From the sentence itself, we know what the development is talking about. Hence, here the noun + noun modifier is functioning like the absolute modifier that correctly modifies the entire preceding clause. You may refer to the following link for more details and examples: http://e-gmat.com/blogs/?p=584 4. So, there is no error in this sentence. The sentence is correct as is. POE:
A. to develop a silicon chip that can transmit and receive light signals directly, a development that may one day lead: Correct as is.
B. to develop a silicon chip with the capability of transmitting and receiving light signals directly, which may one day lead: Incorrect. i. Using “with the capability” with a non-living object is inappropriate. Consider these sentences: a. Tom can jump real high. OR Tom has the capability to jump real high. (Both are correct.) b. This paper can absorb a lot of water. (Not appropriate but in spoken English we hardly pay heed to such things and thus we assume that such expressions are fine in writing as well. However, this is not the case.). c. This paper has the capability to hold a lot of water. (correct) So in this choice, use of “with the capability” with non-living “a silicon chip” is not proper. ii. With “the capability” we generally use “to verb” forms. For e.g., John has the capability/ability to move very heavy objects with his left hand. In this sentence “capability of transmitting…” is not idiomatic. iii. Reference of “which” is not clear. Being a noun modifier, “which” should modify the closest noun. But that will not make sense here because per the context of the sentence, it is the development of the silicon chip that will lead to something. Hence, use of “which” is incorrect.
C. the development of a silicon chip that has the capability of transmitting and receiving light signals directly, a development maybe one day leading: Incorrect. i. Use of “the development” fails to show the purpose of the research. Also, the way this choice has been written it seems to suggest that the research itself is the development that has already taken place. ii. Same idiom errors (has the capability and capability of…) as in B. iii. Verb-ing “leading” non-sensically refers to “one day”.
D. developing a silicon chip that can transmit and receive light signals directly, which may one day lead: Incorrect. i. Use of “developing” fails to establish the purpose of the research. ii. Same “which” clause reference error as in B.
E. developing a silicon chip with the ability to transmit and receive light signals directly, with this development maybe one day leading: Incorrect. i. Use of “developing” fails to establish the purpose of the research.\ ii. “with this development maybe one day leading” is ungrammatical. Don’t even know what it is trying to convey.
1. Idioms must always be correctly worded. 2. Use “to verb” forms to show the purpose or the intent of an action. 3. Noun + noun modifier can either modify the closest noun phrase or the entire preceding clause, depending entirely upon the context of the sentence. 4. The reference of the relative pronouns must be clear.
Re: Now that so much data travels via light—i.e., is carried in glass fibe
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Jun 2010, 06:20
noboru,
I dont think it is question on ||sm. I think the main concern is on style and correctness. One goal....is to develop is correct. I prefer to+infinitive to verb+ing. Moreover, goal/hopes donot come with such noun phrases.
Plug-in C: Now that so much data travels via light—i.e., is carried in glass fibers rather than by electrical current—one goal of semiconductor research is the development of a silicon chip that has the capability of transmitting and receiving light signals directly, a development maybe one day leading to smaller, faster semiconductors.
In A, can is better than the capability of in C.
noboru wrote:
Now that so much data travels via light—i.e., is carried in glass fibers rather than by electrical current—one goal of semiconductor research is to develop a silicon chip that can transmit and receive light signals directly, a development that mav one day lead to smaller, faster semiconductors.
A. to develop a silicon chip that can transmit and receive light signals directly, a development that may one day lead B. to develop a silicon chip with the capability of transmitting and receiving light signals directly, which may one day lead C. the development of a silicon chip that has the capability of transmitting and receiving light signals directly, a development maybe one day leading D. developing a silicon chip that can transmit and receive light signals directly, which may one day lead E. developing a silicon chip with the ability to transmit and receive light signals directly, with this development maybe one day leading
The issue I have here is that in A (OA), there is no || between one goal is to develop. Because of that I chose C, although A sounds much better. Could anybody clarify?
Re: *700* Now that so much data travels via light
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Apr 2015, 04:00
Now that so much data travels via light—i.e., is carried in glass fibers rather than by electrical current—one goal of semiconductor research is to develop a silicon chip that can transmit and receive light signals directly, a development that may one day lead to smaller, faster semiconductors.
A. to develop a silicon chip that can transmit and receive light signals directly, a development that may one day lead -> A good construction, Infinitve to express intent and Noun + Noun Modifier structure which is used to modify the complete goal to develop a silicon chip.
B. to develop a silicon chip with the capability of transmitting and receiving light signals directly, which may one day lead -> which is a relative pronoun and cannot modify a clause.
C. the development of a silicon chip that has the capability of transmitting and receiving light signals directly, a development maybe one day leading Instead of using infinitive, the goal is development (a noun phrase) that makes the sentence verbose.
D. developing a silicon chip that can transmit and receive light signals directly, which may one day lead -> Same issue as B) and gerund (developing) doesn't show the intent.
E. developing a silicon chip with the ability to transmit and receive light signals directly, with this development maybe one day leading -> Gerund construction and with makes it as adverbial modifier and it modifies the verb of the previous clause which doesn't make sense.
_________________
Re: *700* Now that so much data travels via light
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Apr 2015, 14:28
A. to develop a silicon chip that can transmit and receive light signals directly, a development that may one day lead “to+verb” is used to show purpose Noun+noun modifier clearly modifies “silicon chip”. The sentence is correct as it is.
B. to develop a silicon chip with the capability of transmitting and receiving light signals directly, which may one day lead capability of… is wordy. “which may..” modifies the closest noun “signals”, and is incorrect.
C. the development of a silicon chip that has the capability of transmitting and receiving light signals directly, a development maybe one day leading the goal is to develop, not the development This choice introduces a modifier error.
D. developing a silicon chip that can transmit and receive light signals directly, which may one day lead This choice introduces a new error. Verb “is” is followed by “-ing” form. This leads to ambiguity. To show meaning – “to+verb” must be used. Which modifies signals.
E. developing a silicon chip with the ability to transmit and receive light signals directly, with this development maybe one day leading Same error as in D
_________________
Re: Now that so much data travels via light—i.e., is carried in glass fibe
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Sep 2017, 08:11
Simplify sentences.
One goal is... (A) to develop a chip that can do x & y, a development that may lead to z
(B) to develop a chip with the capability of doing x & y, which may lead to z
(C) the development of a chip that has the capability of doing x & y, a development maybe leading to z
(D) developing a chip that can do x & y, which may lead to z
(E) developing a chip with the ability to do x and y, with this development maybe leading to z
Note that the end of the sentence is a modifier. What does it target? what may lead to faster semiconductors? There is no single noun, so we cannot use a noun modifier. When the GMAT wants to refer to something other than the near noun or noun phrase, it uses an -ing or a noun to begin the modifier. In this case, "a development..." is the right way to start the modifier. We can eliminate B, D and E.
C is very inefficient when compared to A. "a chip that can transmit" is more concise than "a chip with the capability of transmitting".
Furthermore, C uses the awkward construct "a development maybe leading to ..." whereas A states "a development that may lead to...". A is the best answer.
_________________
Re: Now that so much data travels via light—i.e., is carried in glass fibe
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Jan 2019, 05:38
Top Contributor
kichen wrote
Quote:
Hi I thought the when you have a noun + to be verb, you must have a noun/adjective at an end. A goal cannot be a verb. Noun + to be + noun/adjective.
Is this a debatable OA since A incorrectly lists a goal as a verb?
Sorry, I could not get at what the poster means by the quote, especially what is the noun+ to be verb in A, and where a goal is depicted as a verb. Could he please articulate his point more explicitly by stating the very sentence?
Thanks and back to the thread
Now that so much data travels via light—i.e., is carried in glass fibers rather than by electrical current—one goal of semiconductor research is to develop a silicon chip that can transmit and receive light signals directly, a development that may one day lead to smaller, faster semiconductors.
The purpose of a goal is best expressed in the infinitive. Any other diction is stylistically incorrect
A. to develop a silicon chip that can transmit and receive light signals directly, a development that may one day lead -- correct choice
B. to develop a silicon chip with the capability of transmitting and receiving light signals directly, which may one day lead
Which has no reference. It cannot point to the signals; nor can it refer to the action of transmitting and receiving.
C. the development of a silicon chip that has the capability of transmitting and receiving light signals directly, a development maybe one day leading -
1. A development may be incidental, coincidental, accidental, declarative, or indicative but not intentional the development is inferior to 'to develop'.
2. The word 'maybe' is superfluous.
D. developing a silicon chip that can transmit and receive light signals directly, which may one-day lead--
1. Developing is wrong. 2., which is wrong.
E. developing a silicon chip with the ability to transmit and receive light signals directly, with this development maybe one day leading
1. Developing is wrong 2. Sentence structure is very clumsy.
However, in the hall, it might be worthwhile to focus on the infinitive of purpose and hit three mangoes with one stone namely C, D, and E. Then it becomes easier to handle A and B in the right perspective. _________________
Re: Now that so much data travels via light—i.e., is carried in glass fibe
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Aug 2019, 05:13
egmat wrote:
B. to develop a silicon chip with the capability of transmitting and receiving light signals directly, which may one day lead: Incorrect. i. Using “with the capability” with a non-living object is inappropriate. Consider these sentences: a. Tom can jump real high. OR Tom has the capability to jump real high. (Both are correct.) b. This paper can absorb a lot of water. (Not appropriate but in spoken English we hardly pay heed to such things and thus we assume that such expressions are fine in writing as well. However, this is not the case.). c. This paper has the capability to hold a lot of water. (correct) So in this choice, use of “with the capability” with non-living “a silicon chip” is not proper. ii. With “the capability” we generally use “to verb” forms. For e.g., John has the capability/ability to move very heavy objects with his left hand. In this sentence “capability of transmitting…” is not idiomatic. iii. Reference of “which” is not clear. Being a noun modifier, “which” should modify the closest noun. But that will not make sense here because per the context of the sentence, it is the development of the silicon chip that will lead to something. Hence, use of “which” is incorrect.
Regarding iii., could you make the argument that "with the capability of transmitting and receiving light signals directly" is a modifier for "silicon chip", and thus the "which" could refer to "silicon chip" without issues?
gmatclubot
Re: Now that so much data travels via light—i.e., is carried in glass fibe
[#permalink]
11 Aug 2019, 05:13
close
87% (01:14) correct 
