Oct 14 08:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Join a 4day FREE online boot camp to kick off your GMAT preparation and get you into your dream bschool in R2.**Limited for the first 99 registrants. Register today! Oct 15 12:00 PM PDT  01:00 PM PDT Join this live GMAT class with GMAT Ninja to learn to conquer your fears of long, kooky GMAT questions. Oct 16 08:00 PM PDT  09:00 PM PDT EMPOWERgmat is giving away the complete Official GMAT Exam Pack collection worth $100 with the 3 Month Pack ($299) Oct 19 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Does GMAT RC seem like an uphill battle? eGMAT is conducting a free webinar to help you learn reading strategies that can enable you to solve 700+ level RC questions with at least 90% accuracy in less than 10 days. Sat., Oct 19th at 7 am PDT Oct 20 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
Posts: 135
Location: India
WE: Operations (Insurance)

Of the four numbers represented on the number line above, is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 14 Jul 2016, 23:24
Question Stats:
70% (01:32) correct 30% (01:43) wrong based on 2187 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Of the four numbers represented on the number line above, is r closest to zero? (1) q = –s (2) –t < q Attachment:
Number line.jpg [ 6.28 KiB  Viewed 34268 times ]
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
Originally posted by devinawilliam83 on 29 Feb 2012, 21:50.
Last edited by Bunuel on 14 Jul 2016, 23:24, edited 2 times in total.
Edited the question and added the diagram




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58316

Of the four numbers represented on the number line above, is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Feb 2012, 23:21
Of the four numbers represented on the number line above, is r closest to zero?(1) q = –s > s and s are on opposite sides of zero and zero is halfway between them. We can have two cases: <(s)(r)0(s)(t)> <(s)0(r)(s)(t)>As you can see in either case r is closest to zero. Sufficient. (2) –t < q > t and t are on opposite sides of zero and zero is halfway between them. We can have two cases: <(t)(q)(r)0(s)(t)> <(t)(q)(r)0(s)(t)>As you can see in either r or s is closest to zero. Not sufficient. Answer: A.
_________________




Intern
Joined: 31 May 2013
Posts: 12

Re: Of the four numbers represented on the number line above, is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Aug 2013, 04:59
the question is not very clear for me.. i've chosen option E because i put ANY value for each letter, should not the question specify that the relation q<r <s <t has always to be true?



VP
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1020
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8

Re: Of the four numbers represented on the number line above, is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Aug 2013, 05:14
lucasITA wrote: the question is not very clear for me.. i've chosen option E because i put ANY value for each letter, should not the question specify that the relation q<r <s <t has always to be true? The question says "Of the four numbers represented on the number line above", so the order is what you get by looking at it: \(q<r <s <t\).
_________________
It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.
Kant , Critique of Pure Reason Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture  Review: MGMAT workshop Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0  Questions: Verbal challenge SC III CR New SC set out !! , My QuantRules for Posting in the Verbal Forum  Rules for Posting in the Quant Forum[/size][/color][/b]



Intern
Joined: 08 Oct 2014
Posts: 15
Location: Turkmenistan
Concentration: Other, International Business
WE: Supply Chain Management (Energy and Utilities)

Re: Of the four numbers represented on the number line above, is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Oct 2014, 03:57
Bunuel wrote: Of the four numbers represented on the number line above, is r closest to zero?
(1) q = –s > s and s are on opposite sides of zero and zero is halfway between them. We can have two cases:
<(s)(r)0(s)(t)> <(s)0(r)(s)(t)> As you can see in either case r is closest to zero. Sufficient.
(2) –t < q > t and t are on opposite sides of zero and zero is halfway between them. We can have two cases:
<(t)(q)(r)0(s)(t)> <(t)(q)(r)0(s)(t)> As you can see in either r or s is closest to zero. Not sufficient.
Answer: A. Bunuel, When t<q, is it possible that q is closest to zero?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58316

Re: Of the four numbers represented on the number line above, is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Oct 2014, 06:38
shohrat6383 wrote: Bunuel wrote: Of the four numbers represented on the number line above, is r closest to zero?
(1) q = –s > s and s are on opposite sides of zero and zero is halfway between them. We can have two cases:
<(s)(r)0(s)(t)> <(s)0(r)(s)(t)> As you can see in either case r is closest to zero. Sufficient.
(2) –t < q > t and t are on opposite sides of zero and zero is halfway between them. We can have two cases:
<(t)(q)(r)0(s)(t)> <(t)(q)(r)0(s)(t)> As you can see in either r or s is closest to zero. Not sufficient.
Answer: A. Bunuel, When t<q, is it possible that q is closest to zero? We are interested whether r closest to zero and for the case when –t < q, we have an YES and a NO answer: <(t)(q)(r)0(s)(t)> <(t)(q)(r)0(s)(t)>
_________________



Manager
Joined: 21 Jan 2014
Posts: 61
WE: General Management (NonProfit and Government)

Re: Of the four numbers represented on the number line above, is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Oct 2014, 10:41
As per the question ,r lies somewhere in between q & s .
1) q=s it implies that the value of r lies somewhere between s & s . also it will be close to 0 in all situation . this part is SUFFICIENT.
2)t<q this part fixes value for t & q resulting :  we don't know the location of 0. this leads to many possibilities such as r & s may lie at opposite side of 0 or may lie in the same side. so in this scenario r may or may not be close to 0. INSUFFICIENT.
ANSWER MUST BE A



Intern
Joined: 16 May 2015
Posts: 28

Re: Of the four numbers represented on the number line above, is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 May 2015, 08:32
this question seems weird to me..i don't understand the definition of 'close'..
for statement 1, yes, 0 is in the middle of the distance between S and T and R is between them as well.but how to link it to close to zero as we don't know the value of S and T.
Could be 100 and 100 and R be 99. Does it consider Close? Need help to clarify my doubt...



eGMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Posts: 3074

Re: Of the four numbers represented on the number line above, is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 May 2015, 11:07
katzzzz wrote: this question seems weird to me..i don't understand the definition of 'close'..
for statement 1, yes, 0 is in the middle of the distance between S and T and R is between them as well.but how to link it to close to zero as we don't know the value of S and T.
Could be 100 and 100 and R be 99. Does it consider Close? Need help to clarify my doubt... Hi katzzzz, By closest to zero the question is talking about the distance between zero and the numbers given in the question i.e. q, r, s and t. As per statementI, zero is the midpoint of q and s and r lies between them. Now, there can be two scenarios: 1. r is closer to q than to s.Let's assume the distance between q and zero and s and zero to be x. Since r lies between s and zero, its distance from zero would be less than x. 2. r is closer to s than to q.Similarly in this case, we will have the distance of r from zero less than x. In both the cases we can see that the distance of r from zero is lesser compared to the distance of q and s from zero. Also, t is greater than s and hence is at the greatest distance from zero compared to q, r and s. Hence we can say with certainty that r is the closest to zero. Let me know if you have trouble understanding the analysis of stII as well. Hope this helps Regards Harsh
_________________



EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Status: GMAT Assassin/CoFounder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Posts: 15240
Location: United States (CA)

Re: Of the four numbers represented on the number line above, is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 May 2015, 16:19
Hi All, While this question appears layered, it can be solved rather easily by TESTing VALUES and paying attention to the relative 'positions' of the variables on the number line. It's important to note that since this is a DS question, we CANNOT trust the picture. We DO know the "order" of the variables on the number line, but we do NOT know if they are evenly spaced out. We're asked if R is CLOSEST to 0. This is a YES/NO question. Fact 1: Q = S This tells us that Q and S are opposites. By extension, since they represent 2 DIFFERENT spots on the number line, neither can be 0. Also, since they're opposites and Q is "farther left", then Q is NEGATIVE and S is POSITIVE. IF.... Q = 1 S = 1 R is BETWEEN 1 and 1, so it IS the closest to 0 and the answer to the question is YES. IF... Q = 2 S = 2 R is BETWEEN 2 and 2, so it IS the closest to 0 and the answer to the question is YES. This pattern is consistent no matter what set of numbers you use for Q and S. The answer is ALWAYS YES. Fact 1 is SUFFICIENT Fact 2: T < Q IF.... Q = 2 T = 3 We can then place R and S between the two values.... IF.... R = 2.1 S = 2.2 Q is closer to 0 than R is, so the answer to the question is NO IF.... R = 0 S = 1 R is the closest to 0 (it IS 0), so the answer to the question is YES Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT Final Answer: GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made, Rich
_________________
Contact Rich at: Rich.C@empowergmat.comThe Course Used By GMAT Club Moderators To Earn 750+ souvik101990 Score: 760 Q50 V42 ★★★★★ ENGRTOMBA2018 Score: 750 Q49 V44 ★★★★★



Manager
Joined: 21 Jan 2014
Posts: 61
WE: General Management (NonProfit and Government)

Re: Of the four numbers represented on the number line above, is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 May 2015, 00:46
katzzzz wrote: this question seems weird to me..i don't understand the definition of 'close'..
for statement 1, yes, 0 is in the middle of the distance between S and T and R is between them as well.but how to link it to close to zero as we don't know the value of S and T.
Could be 100 and 100 and R be 99. Does it consider Close? Need help to clarify my doubt... Hi Katzzzz, The question specifically asks whether r is closest to "0" of the four numbers or not . Undoubtedly,S could be 100 and R be 99 ,but R(99) is close to "0" with respect to S(100) and other number(S<T) as mentioned on the number line. You have to deal this problem with reference to other numbers mentioned in the question. Hope this helps.



Director
Joined: 04 Jun 2016
Posts: 557

Re: Of the four numbers represented on the number line above, is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Jul 2016, 23:22
devinawilliam83 wrote: Attachment: Number line.jpg Of the four numbers represented on the number line above, is r closest to zero? (1) q = –s (2) –t < q Am unable to understand the explanation in the OG. Are we just suppose to believe/assume that all points are equidistant from the other?? There is a better version of this question on page 1 of sub500 coordinate geometry directory page.
_________________
Posting an answer without an explanation is "GOD COMPLEX". The world doesn't need any more gods. Please explain you answers properly. FINAL GOODBYE : 17th SEPTEMBER 2016. .. 16 March 2017  I am back but for all purposes please consider me semiretired.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58316

Re: Of the four numbers represented on the number line above, is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Jul 2016, 23:29
LogicGuru1 wrote: devinawilliam83 wrote: Attachment: Number line.jpg Of the four numbers represented on the number line above, is r closest to zero? (1) q = –s (2) –t < q Am unable to understand the explanation in the OG. Are we just suppose to believe/assume that all points are equidistant from the other?? There is a better version of this question on page 1 of sub500 coordinate geometry directory page. No, we cannot assume that the gaps between two adjacent points are equal. We can infer from the image only the relative position (order) of points.
_________________



Director
Joined: 04 Jun 2016
Posts: 557

Of the four numbers represented on the number line above, is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Jul 2016, 09:29
devinawilliam83 wrote: Of the four numbers represented on the number line above, is r closest to zero? (1) q = –s (2) –t < q Attachment: Number line.jpg Of the four numbers represented on the number line above, is r closest to zero? See how the question is asking us is r "CLOSER" to zero and not asking us is r "Greater than or Less than zero" In a number line with no marking for magnitude, it would have been almost impossible to tell whether r is greater than or less than 0 (1) q = –s Sufficient : q and s must have a zero in between them and they both will be equidistant from 0 For example q=5 then s=5 r is between q and s so it can never touch the same magnitude as r or s . It can never be 5. It can be 4.99999....... to 4.99999..... It has to be be anything less than 5 hence it will always be closer to zero compared to q and s. (2) –t < q Tells us there is 0 between t and q but there r and s are also between t and q; s we don't know whether r or s is close to 0 INSUFFICIENT ANSWER IS A
_________________
Posting an answer without an explanation is "GOD COMPLEX". The world doesn't need any more gods. Please explain you answers properly. FINAL GOODBYE : 17th SEPTEMBER 2016. .. 16 March 2017  I am back but for all purposes please consider me semiretired.



Intern
Joined: 28 Jun 2016
Posts: 6

Re: Of the four numbers represented on the number line above, is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Jan 2017, 08:04
Hi Brunel,
In the 2nd case, is the below case possible?
<(t)0(q)(r)(s)(t)>



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58316

Re: Of the four numbers represented on the number line above, is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Jan 2017, 09:22
KARTAB wrote: Hi Brunel,
In the 2nd case, is the below case possible?
<(t)0(q)(r)(s)(t)> Yes, this is a possible case for (2), giving a NO answer to the question.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 28 Jun 2016
Posts: 2

Re: Of the four numbers represented on the number line above, is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Jan 2017, 07:58
For the first case, I got a little confused because I considered the case of q and s = 0, and accordingly r will be equal to 0 as well.
The given does not mention anything about the values not being equal, does it?



EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Status: GMAT Assassin/CoFounder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Posts: 15240
Location: United States (CA)

Re: Of the four numbers represented on the number line above, is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Jan 2017, 21:47
Hi ahmedhammam, This question includes a Number Line with the 4 variables placed at 'hash marks.' However, we don't know the 'scale' of the line (and it's likely that the 4 numbers are NOT evenly spaced out)... For example, Q R S and T could be 1, 2, 3 and 4 OR Q R S and T could be 1, 10, 19 and 2000. We DO know that the 4 numbers are arranged from least to greatest (because that's how a Number Line "works"). By extension, one of the 4 numbers COULD be 0, but two of them cannot (and no two of the variables are the same value). GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made, Rich
_________________
Contact Rich at: Rich.C@empowergmat.comThe Course Used By GMAT Club Moderators To Earn 750+ souvik101990 Score: 760 Q50 V42 ★★★★★ ENGRTOMBA2018 Score: 750 Q49 V44 ★★★★★



Intern
Joined: 05 Jan 2017
Posts: 21
Location: India

Re: Of the four numbers represented on the number line above, is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Mar 2017, 20:42
is it safe to assume the figure is drawn to the scale and hence if q = s than r is midpoint for q and s and hence r is 0 or close to it?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58316

Re: Of the four numbers represented on the number line above, is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Mar 2017, 01:44
kuvshah wrote: is it safe to assume the figure is drawn to the scale and hence if q = s than r is midpoint for q and s and hence r is 0 or close to it? No, you absolutely cannot assume that. OFFICIAL GUIDE:Problem SolvingFigures: All figures accompanying problem solving questions are intended to provide information useful in solving the problems. Figures are drawn as accurately as possible. Exceptions will be clearly noted. Lines shown as straight are straight, and lines that appear jagged are also straight. The positions of points, angles, regions, etc., exist in the order shown, and angle measures are greater than zero. All figures lie in a plane unless otherwise indicated. Data Sufficiency:Figures:• Figures conform to the information given in the question, but will not necessarily conform to the additional information given in statements (1) and (2). • Lines shown as straight are straight, and lines that appear jagged are also straight. • The positions of points, angles, regions, etc., exist in the order shown, and angle measures are greater than zero. • All figures lie in a plane unless otherwise indicated.
_________________




Re: Of the four numbers represented on the number line above, is
[#permalink]
03 Mar 2017, 01:44



Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 31 posts ]



