On Aug 13,1868, the warship U.S.S. Wateree, anchored in the

Question

On Aug 13,1868, the warship U.S.S. Wateree, anchored in the harbor of Arica, off the coast of what is now northern Chile,  rode on the crest of a tsunami (seismic sea wave) and coming to rest in the Atacama Desert, it was  some three miles up the coast and almost two miles inland from its initial anchorage.

A) rode on the crest of a tsunami (seismic sea wave) and coming to rest in the Atacama Desert, it was
B) rode on the crest of a tsunami (seismic sea wave), while it came to rest in the Atacama Desert,
C) rode on the crest of a tsunami (seismic sea wave) and came to rest in the Atacama Desert,
D) riding on the crest of a tsunami (seismic sea wave), to come to rest in the Atacama Desert
E) riding on the crest of a tsunami (seismic sea wave), it had come to rest in the Atacama Desert, which is

sudhir18n · Answer

Too many Commas..ahhhh:)
A and B are out - 'It' pronoun ambigous.
E i think creates run-on
D is awkward.. riding ... to come
C is perfect

MSDHONI · Answer

Answer should be "C"
Explanations are next to choices

venmic · Answer

Experts can anyone help

I am actually mainly confused here on C

X and Y implies that

X happened and at the same time Y happened ? is my understanding correct

So according to C it rode and at the same time came to rest hovv can this be possible

vvhat is vvrong vvith B - please explain

Thanks for your time

mikemcgarry · Answer

Dear venmic First of all, the word "and" is not an absolute guarantee of complete simultaneity. If you are listing events with "and", it's true these events should be close in time and sequentially connected ---- " he walked up the stairs and opened the door " " the engine sped to the spot and promptly put the fire out " " she wrote him a nasty letter and mailed it to him that same afternoon " In all of these example, the actions are close in time, but not strictly simultaneous. Granted, it would be incorrect to use a simple "and" connection for events that were quite distant in time or completely unrelated, but you are reading far too much into this vvord. "Close in time" is not the same as "100% exactly at the same time." To say " the warship U.S.S. Wateree ... rode on the crest of a tsunami and came to rest in the Atacama Desert ..." is a perfectly correct: clear, logical, and unambiguous. The two events --- riding the wave and then coming to rest --- are near in time (they both happened within 5-10 minutes of each other) and they are definitely sequentially & causally connected. That's 100% correct, which is one of the reasons that (C) is correct. Let's look at (B) On Aug 13,1868, the warship U.S.S. Wateree, anchored in the harbor of Arica, off the coast of what is now northern Chile, rode on the crest of a tsunami (seismic sea wave), while it came to rest in the Atacama Desert, some three miles up the coast and almost two miles inland from its initial anchorage. One way to express the problem --- there's a failure of parallelism. The two actions --- riding the crest and coming to rest --- should be in parallel, because they are sequentially & causally connected. Actions that have a clear logical connection should have a clear grammatical connection. Another way to express the problem --- this choice actually has the problem that you imputed to (C) ----- by using "while' (which means "at the same time"), it implies that the riding of the crest and the coming to rest in the desert were simultaneous, which is illogical and not what the sentence means. Also, it's just awkward and unnatural --- it "sounds funny", probably because of these reasons. BTW, the story in this sentence ---this is all true --- this actually happened to the USS Wateree in 1868. Does all this make sense? Mike :-)

scubaVC · Answer

I chose C.

Parallel: anchored -> rode -> came

AjiteshArun · Answer

We should not look at  anchored  as being part of the list.

On Aug 13,1868,  the warship U.S.S. Wateree,  anchored in the harbor of Arica, off the coast of what is now northern Chile ,  rode  on the crest of a tsunami (seismic sea wave) and  came to rest  in the Atacama Desert,  some three miles up the coast and almost two miles inland from its initial anchorage .

Anchored  is just a modifier.

scubaVC · Answer

Posted from my mobile device

swetap · Answer

Can someone help with the answer choice explanation (esp E)?

CrackverbalGMAT · Answer

On Aug 13,1868, the warship U.S.S. Wateree, anchored in the harbor of Arica, off the coast of what is now northern Chile,  rode on the crest of a tsunami (seismic sea wave) and coming to rest in the Atacama Desert, it was  some three miles up the coast and almost two miles inland from its initial anchorage.

A) rode on the crest of a tsunami (seismic sea wave) and coming to rest in the Atacama Desert, it was  The sentence is describing an event in the past, usage of "coming" in the present tense is incorrect. Additionally, "it was" is redundant. Eliminate.

B) rode on the crest of a tsunami (seismic sea wave), while it came to rest in the Atacama Desert,  "while" indicates some sort of contrasting transition, which is not reflected in the information in the second half of the sentence. Eliminate.

C) rode on the crest of a tsunami (seismic sea wave) and came to rest in the Atacama Desert,  Correct answer. Errors in (A) are removed and no new errors are introduced.

D) riding on the crest of a tsunami (seismic sea wave), to come to rest in the Atacama Desert  When describing a past event, usage of "riding" in present continuous tense is incorrect. Eliminate.

E) riding on the crest of a tsunami (seismic sea wave), it had come to rest in the Atacama Desert, which is  Same as (D). Eliminate.

Hope this helps.

mba757 · Answer

A. rode on the crest of a tsunami (seismic sea wave) and coming to rest in the Atacama Desert, it was
 (1) breaks parallelism: “…the warship U.S.S. Wateree…rode on the crest…AND coming to rest…”;

B. rode on the crest of a tsunami (seismic sea wave), while it came to rest in the Atacama Desert,
 (1) meaning error: the “while” leads you to think that the it rode on the crest of wave WHILE it came to rest in the Desert? Nonsensical

C. rode on the crest of a tsunami (seismic sea wave) and came to rest in the Atacama Desert,
 best option

D. riding on the crest of a tsunami (seismic sea wave), to come to rest in the Atacama Desert
 (1) incomplete sentence: missing an action verb – there’s only a string of modifiers

E. riding on the crest of a tsunami (seismic sea wave), it had come to rest in the Atacama Desert, which is
 (1) verb tense error, leading to meaning error: “…it HAD COME to rest…” – so it rested in the Atacama Desert FIRST then what? Then it was riding on the crest? It’s ambiguous at best; (2) modifier error, leading to meaning error: the which clause basically states the Desert is some three miles up the coast, but it’s the ship (i.e., the warship U.S.S. Wateree) that’s three miles up the coast

VerbalBot · Answer

Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

On Aug 13,1868, the warship U.S.S. Wateree, anchored in the

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Questions

On Aug 13,1868, the warship U.S.S. Wateree, anchored in the

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards