Last visit was: 19 Jul 2025, 17:35 It is currently 19 Jul 2025, 17:35
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,348
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
anshulpal15
Joined: 16 Sep 2019
Last visit: 09 Aug 2021
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sumi1010
Joined: 21 Aug 2018
Last visit: 19 Jan 2025
Posts: 302
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Location: India
Posts: 302
Kudos: 691
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,348
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sumi

Let's look at it. An increase amounting to five miles per gallon is not a universal factor. It is a goal in the context because the idea is still at the nascent phase. The goal will differ from manufacturer to manufacturer and from the type of vehicle-to-vehicle. Therefore, to get at what amounts to five miles per gallon, one must correlate it with the manufacturer, the manufacturer's goal, and the intended type of vehicle. One cannot leave out any single factor. That is the reason the adverbial modifiers are required to modify the entire previous clause.
In the second example, the merger itself is the result of the two companies wanting to unite. Forming a new company is not the result of a merger, but a specific outcome of the two companies' way of operating going forward.
The take-away: Adverbial modifiers do modify the entire previous clause and because when we say a clause, it includes the subject. There is no way one can ignore the subject's connection in adverbial modifier either by chance or by choice.
User avatar
Sumi1010
Joined: 21 Aug 2018
Last visit: 19 Jan 2025
Posts: 302
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Location: India
Posts: 302
Kudos: 691
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh

Quote:
Therefore, to get at what amounts to five miles per gallon, one must correlate it with the manufacturer, the manufacturer's goal, and the intended type of vehicle. One cannot leave out any single factor. That is the reason the adverbial modifiers are required to modify the entire previous clause
.

Following your reasoning, adverbial modifiers are required for "One automobile manufacturer has announced plans to increase the average fuel efficiency of its sport utility vehicles by 25 percent over the next five years,.....".
I don't see any other reason why (A)amounting to roughly five miles per gallon, and representing is incorrect except it has ",and". Comma is not required. It will be very difficult to eliminate a choice based on punctuation (,) during exam hours. :roll:
User avatar
gvij2017
Joined: 09 Aug 2017
Last visit: 18 Jun 2024
Posts: 675
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 778
Posts: 675
Kudos: 470
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option D could be much better if it were written as below. However, it is best choice among given options.
(D) an increase that would amount to roughly five miles per gallon and that would represent
User avatar
Sumi1010
Joined: 21 Aug 2018
Last visit: 19 Jan 2025
Posts: 302
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Location: India
Posts: 302
Kudos: 691
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gvij2017
No, the parallelism should not be an issue in (D) an increase that would amount to roughly five miles per gallon and (that) would represent... "that" in the beginning of the sentence is understood for latter as well.
(that) in latter case is optional.

However, I want to understand if adverbial modifier in (A) is incorrect just because of a comma (before and) or there is any other reason.
User avatar
aniket16c
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 20 Oct 2018
Last visit: 05 Feb 2024
Posts: 180
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
GPA: 4
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
Posts: 180
Kudos: 153
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sumi1010
I have a question here.
Many posts suggest that 'amounting' and 'representing' modify the preceding clause and hence A is wrong.
The manufacturer's announcement does result into the efficiency of 5 miles per gallon ( & representation), but it is 'the increase in the efficiency'.
However, in the below GMAT question , 'forming' modifies the two companies agreement and not merger ( using the same logic as above). But, it is merger and not the act of agreement which resulted the formation of new company.
Here B is correct .
How 'forming' can modify merger ? Please help.

The two oil companies agreed to merge their refining and marketing operations in the Midwest and the West, forming a new company for controlling nearly fifteen of the nation’s gasoline sales.
A. forming a new company for controlling
B. forming a new company that would control
C. which would form a new company that controlled
D. which formed a new company for controlling
E. which formed a new company that would control

I will try to answer:
1. "verb-ing + comma" can modify the clause in two ways - the resultant verb-ing must represent either the result or the how aspect of the previous clause.
In this case, the verb-ing represents the result - "forming a new company" is the result of the two companies agreeing to merge.
The "verb-ing" is not modifying "merger". Rather it is modifying "two companies agreed".

I hope that clears your doubt!
User avatar
Sumi1010
Joined: 21 Aug 2018
Last visit: 19 Jan 2025
Posts: 302
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Location: India
Posts: 302
Kudos: 691
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aniket16c
Thanks.
The same was explained by daagh too on my query for this particular question.
However, the same logic should work in below sentence too.
One automobile manufacturer has announced plans to increase the average fuel efficiency of its sport utility vehicles by 25 percent over the next five years,amounting to roughly five miles per gallon, and representing the first significant change in the fuel efficiency of any class of passenger vehicle in almost two decades.

Why is (A) wrong here?

Ron (MGMAT) quotes - Punctuation (comma) is not tested in GMAT, then what else is wrong in A?
avatar
Rocknrolla21
Joined: 16 Jul 2019
Last visit: 13 Aug 2021
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 227
Schools: NUS '23
Schools: NUS '23
Posts: 41
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
egmat can you please take up this one? I don't understand how to eliminate A. I mean D sure sounds better than A, but still don't have a concrete explanation to eliminate A.

Thanks!
User avatar
kagrawal16
Joined: 31 Jul 2018
Last visit: 01 Dec 2022
Posts: 94
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 76
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GPA: 3
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
Posts: 94
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi GMATGuruNY,

One automobile manufacturer has announced plans to increase the average fuel efficiency of its sport utility vehicles by 25 percent over the next five years, amounting to roughly five miles per gallon, and representing the first significant change in the fuel efficiency of any class of passenger vehicle in almost two decades.

(A) amounting to rougly five miles per gallon, and representing
(B) amounting to rougly five miles per gallon, and it would represent
(C) an increase that would amount to roughly five miles per gallon and it would represent
(D) an increase that would amount to roughly five miles per gallon and would represent
(E) which is an increase amounting to roughly five miles per gallon, representing


Request your help to understand whether both Present participle modifier (amounting and representing) to convey result of preceding action "to increase"
and
Noun Modifier (an increase) are correct in the context of this sentence, other errors aside.

My reasoning is that ing is incorrect because:
1) plans for any one to increase - not necessarily the manufacturer. Indirect doer i.e. doer of increase not clear.
In this it would be helpful if you help with the role of "to increase"
If its an adjective modifying plans then => plans for anyone to increase (anyone is subject)
If its an adverb infinitive of purpose then => manufacturer is the implied subject. (In this case this reason for ing being incorrect is not valid).

2) Also the cause has not occurred yet for the effect to occur as represented by ING.

Can you help with this question.

TIA
User avatar
GMATGuruNY
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 08 Jul 2025
Posts: 1,345
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,345
Kudos: 3,669
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kagrawal16
Request your help to understand whether both Present participle modifier (amounting and representing) to convey result of preceding action "to increase"
and
Noun Modifier (an increase) are correct in the context of this sentence, other errors aside.

My reasoning is that ing is incorrect because:
1) plans for any one to increase - not necessarily the manufacturer. Indirect doer i.e. doer of increase not clear.
In this it would be helpful if you help with the role of "to increase"
If its an adjective modifying plans then => plans for anyone to increase (anyone is subject)
If its an adverb infinitive of purpose then => manufacturer is the implied subject. (In this case this reason for ing being incorrect is not valid).

2) Also the cause has not occurred yet for the effect to occur as represented by ING.

Can you help with this question.

TIA

One automobile manufacturer has announced plans to increase the average fuel efficiency of its sport utility vehicles, amounting to roughly five miles per gallon.

Here, to increase serves as an adjective modifying plans.
Question: What KINDS of plans?
Answer: plans TO INCREASE the average fuel efficiency

Since to increase is an adjective, COMMA + amounting seems to refer to the portion in green -- the preceding subject and verb -- implying that the MANUFACTURER was AMOUNTING.
This meaning is nonsensical.
User avatar
kagrawal16
Joined: 31 Jul 2018
Last visit: 01 Dec 2022
Posts: 94
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 76
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GPA: 3
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
Posts: 94
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATGuruNY
kagrawal16
Request your help to understand whether both Present participle modifier (amounting and representing) to convey result of preceding action "to increase"
and
Noun Modifier (an increase) are correct in the context of this sentence, other errors aside.

My reasoning is that ing is incorrect because:
1) plans for any one to increase - not necessarily the manufacturer. Indirect doer i.e. doer of increase not clear.
In this it would be helpful if you help with the role of "to increase"
If its an adjective modifying plans then => plans for anyone to increase (anyone is subject)
If its an adverb infinitive of purpose then => manufacturer is the implied subject. (In this case this reason for ing being incorrect is not valid).

2) Also the cause has not occurred yet for the effect to occur as represented by ING.

Can you help with this question.

TIA

One automobile manufacturer has announced plans to increase the average fuel efficiency of its sport utility vehicles, amounting to roughly five miles per gallon.

Here, to increase serves as an adjective modifying plans.
Question: What KINDS of plans?
Answer: plans TO INCREASE the average fuel efficiency

Since to increase is an adjective, COMMA + amounting seems to refer to the portion in green -- the preceding subject and verb -- implying that the MANUFACTURER was AMOUNTING.
This meaning is nonsensical.

i got the below excerpt from the forum. Ron says that , squinting describes the action of leaning and leaning in this case is adjective. Watchmaker is the subject and is leaning.
As per your quote above I get that to increase is adjective and the ing doesn't apply to "to increase" in its adjective form.
Is it because plans to increase has no Subject as plans is the implied object of increase. Some one will use to the plan to increase.

Quote"
- I peeked into the workshop and saw the master watchmaker leaning over the table, squinting at the tiny parts of an old Rolex.
Ron: here, comma + "squinting..." describes the action of "leaning over the table".
"leaning" isn't technically a verb, but it still represents an action (and is ultimately derived from a verb).
Once again, comma + squinting is not referring to the subject of the sentence “I” and its action “peeked” or “saw”, but referring to the nearest action “squinting” and its performer “the master watchmaker”."

Also in the below question one of the answer choices as quoted.
Many house builders offer rent-to-buy programs, which enables a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to move into new housing, applying part of the rent to a purchase later.

Does applying modify "to move" or offer ?

Thank You Sir.!
User avatar
GMATGuruNY
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 08 Jul 2025
Posts: 1,345
Own Kudos:
3,669
 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,345
Kudos: 3,669
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kagrawal16
Request your help to understand whether both Present participlsquinting describes the action of leaning and leaning in this case is adjective. Watchmaker is the subject and is leaning.
As per your quote above I get that to increase is adjective and the ing doesn't apply to "to increase" in its adjective form.
Is it because plans to increase has no Subject as plans is the implied object of increase. Some one will use to the plan to increase.

Quote"
- I peeked into the workshop and saw the master watchmaker leaning over the table, squinting at the tiny parts of an old Rolex.
Ron: here, comma + "squinting..." describes the action of "leaning over the table".
"leaning" isn't technically a verb, but it still represents an action (and is ultimately derived from a verb).
Once again, comma + squinting is not referring to the subject of the sentence “I” and its action “peeked” or “saw”, but referring to the nearest action “squinting” and its performer “the master watchmaker”."

Generally, COMMA + VERBing refers to the nearest preceding action that has an EXPLICIT GRAMMATICAL AGENT.
In the green portion above, leaning is provided an explicit grammatical agent: the master watchmaker.
As a result, COMMA + squinting refers to the portion in green, conveying the following meaning.
When the watchmaker was LEANING, he simultaneously was SQUINTING.

Quote:
Also in the below question one of the answer choices as quoted.
Many house builders offer rent-to-buy programs, which enables a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to move into new housing, applying part of the rent to a purchase later.

Does applying modify "to move" or offer ?

Thank You Sir.!

Here, to move has an explicit grammatical agent: a family.
As a result, COMMA + applying refers to the green portion above, conveying the following meaning:
When A FAMILY is enabled TO MOVE, the family will simultaneously be APPLYING part of the rent.

Quote:
One automobile manufacturer has announced plans to increase the average fuel efficiency vehicles, amounting to roughly five miles per gallon.

Here, to increase is not given an explicit grammatical agent.
As a result, COMMA + amounting seems to refer not to the infinitive in red but to the preceding portion in green.
User avatar
Adnani
Joined: 16 Oct 2022
Last visit: 22 Aug 2024
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 138
Location: Pakistan
Schools: Molson
GMAT 1: 600 Q44 V29
GPA: 3.7
Schools: Molson
GMAT 1: 600 Q44 V29
Posts: 62
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Amounting to... modifying...next five years.... isnt???

Posted from my mobile device
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7359 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts