Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 06:08 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 06:08
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
thangvietnam
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Last visit: 09 Mar 2023
Posts: 768
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,198
Posts: 768
Kudos: 418
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Mizar18
Joined: 28 Jan 2019
Last visit: 23 Oct 2025
Posts: 177
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 130
Location: Peru
Posts: 177
Kudos: 266
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ChiranjeevSingh
Joined: 22 Oct 2012
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 411
Own Kudos:
3,058
 [2]
Given Kudos: 154
Status:Private GMAT Tutor
Location: India
Concentration: Economics, Finance
Schools: IIMA  (A)
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V85 DI85
GMAT Focus 2: 735 Q90 V85 DI85
GMAT Focus 3: 735 Q88 V87 DI84
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V47
GRE 1: Q170 V168
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: IIMA  (A)
GMAT Focus 3: 735 Q88 V87 DI84
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V47
GRE 1: Q170 V168
Posts: 411
Kudos: 3,058
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Namangupta1997
Joined: 23 Oct 2020
Last visit: 05 Apr 2025
Posts: 145
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 63
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Posts: 145
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AndrewN
NandishSS
HI GMATNinja, GMATGuruNY, MentorTutoring, generis, GMATRockstar,

Can you please help me with this SC. It's a bit confusing.
Hello, NandishSS. Yes, this is a confusing question, but I will do my best to get to the bottom of each answer choice. How about we have a look?

jubilee777
One in five Americans who work shorter hours at their job in order to provide care for an elderly relative save society millions of dollars that would ordinarily be required for nursing homes or other long-term care facilities.

A. One in five Americans who work shorter hours at their job in order to provide care for an elderly relative save
I have highlighted the beginning of the who clause to indicate that although we are dealing with a singular subject of one in the main clause, the relative pronoun who after Americans triggers a plural subject-verb agreement. The idea is that we are talking about a group of Americans who do something, singling out a member of that group for discussion. Crucially, without the relative pronoun (i.e. who), the sentence would require a singular subject-verb agreement instead. Please see this post on the topic, a collection of dedicated notes originally from Ron Purewal. Thus, one in five Americans who work... save is absolutely fine. The one debatable point I find in this option is the use of the singular job, which makes it sound as though we are referring back to the individual, an especially odd time to do so, since it follows the plural pronoun their. I would not get rid of this answer choice right away, but I would keep looking.

jubilee777
B. One in five Americans working shorter hours at their jobs in order to provide care for an elderly relative saves
Okay, this is another tricky answer, but one that can be disproved with a closer look at subject-verb agreement. You might recall that an -ing modifier without a comma modifies the preceding noun, so their is correct to agree with Americans. But then we get saves later on, and if we are talking about Americans as a group in the rest of the sentence, the earlier part, then we need the verb to be save for the sake of consistency. By using saves, the sentence shifts the focus back to the individual, which makes it seem as if their refers—incorrectly—to that same individual. Even though gender-neutral pronouns are in vogue right now, at least in the United States, standardized grammar rules tend to be slower to catch up, and as of this writing, their must still refer to a plural subject.

jubilee777
C. The one in five Americans who work shorter hours at a job in order to provide care for an elderly relative saves
Yet another arcane grammar rule is on display here. After what I wrote above for choice (A), how could I reject this option for the same plural subject-verb agreement? It all has to do with the article the at the head of the sentence, which is used to indicate the one and only, a singular subject. So, despite the one in five... who construct, the the overrides everything. The agreement must be the one in five Americans who works.

jubilee777
D. Those Americans, approximately one-fifth of all employees, who work shorter hours at a job in order to care for an elderly relative save
Sure, there are more words, but the meaning here is crystal clear, and the subject-verb agreement is perfect.

jubilee777
E. Providing care for an elderly relative, approximately one-fifth of all American employees work shorter hours at a job and it saves
Another easy elimination, this time on the grounds that the sentence, without a comma after job creates a run-on. We do not even have to consider whether anything else is off. Take it as a gift, given some of the other choices.

There you have it. I hope that helps clarify your areas of concern. Choice (D) is the best of the bunch, but whoever designed the original question must have been combing through the back of some unabridged and quite lengthy grammar guide.

Thank you for tagging me on this one, and best of luck with your studies.

- Andrew

Hi AndrewN

I was able to narrow down to A and D. S-V agreement is correct in both. As the GMAT generally prefers a more succinct answer choice, I went for A.

Having read your explanation, I have a query : You mentioned the use of "job" may not be correct in A. But the singular "job" is used in option D as well.
So what exactly makes A inferior ? Is it because option D uses "a job" ? Maybe that makes it free from subtle errors? From a grammatical standpoint, I couldn't point out any glaring errors in option A.
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,511
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Namangupta1997
Hi AndrewN

I was able to narrow down to A and D. S-V agreement is correct in both. As the GMAT generally prefers a more succinct answer choice, I went for A.

Having read your explanation, I have a query : You mentioned the use of "job" may not be correct in A. But the singular "job" is used in option D as well.
So what exactly makes A inferior ? Is it because option D uses "a job" ? Maybe that makes it free from subtle errors? From a grammatical standpoint, I couldn't point out any glaring errors in option A.
Good question, Namangupta1997. The difference, believe it or not, comes down to what precedes the word job: a job conveys only that the Americans in question are working; their job suggests either that these Americans share the same occupation, or, if that interpretation is not intended, that an s is missing from the end of the word. People work at their [respective] jobs, not at their job. The generic article a is a safer bet, in terms of meaning.

Thank you for thinking to follow up. Good luck with your studies.

- Andrew
User avatar
Mavisdu1017
Joined: 10 Aug 2021
Last visit: 04 Jan 2023
Posts: 360
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 226
Posts: 360
Kudos: 46
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello expert,
This question really confused me. I found the official explanation is different from what the expert said.
Especially in D, it uses “at a job” while the subject and verb use plural form, so experts could you illuminate each choice? Much thanks.
User avatar
ReedArnoldMPREP
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 30 Apr 2021
Last visit: 20 Dec 2024
Posts: 521
Own Kudos:
536
 [4]
Given Kudos: 37
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V47
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V47
Posts: 521
Kudos: 536
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mavisdu1017
Hello expert,
This question really confused me. I found the official explanation is different from what the expert said.
Especially in D, it uses “at a job” while the subject and verb use plural form, so experts could you illuminate each choice? Much thanks.

I agree, I think I would prefer plural 'jobs' in D. However, we have to take the best of what is given.

Also, I think Andrew's explanation above is prudent:

AndrewN
Namangupta1997
Hi AndrewN

I was able to narrow down to A and D. S-V agreement is correct in both. As the GMAT generally prefers a more succinct answer choice, I went for A.

Having read your explanation, I have a query : You mentioned the use of "job" may not be correct in A. But the singular "job" is used in option D as well.
So what exactly makes A inferior ? Is it because option D uses "a job" ? Maybe that makes it free from subtle errors? From a grammatical standpoint, I couldn't point out any glaring errors in option A.
Good question, Namangupta1997. The difference, believe it or not, comes down to what precedes the word job: a job conveys only that the Americans in question are working; their job suggests either that these Americans share the same occupation, or, if that interpretation is not intended, that an s is missing from the end of the word. People work at their [respective] jobs, not at their job. The generic article a is a safer bet, in terms of meaning.

Thank you for thinking to follow up. Good luck with your studies.

- Andrew

One thing I will add about A-C that I don't think I've seen mentioned (though I might have missed it in my quick scan through the long discussions on this topic) is that there is some meaning ambiguity with the modifier of the 'one in five americans.'

If I say "One in five Americans who work shorter hours at their job to provide care..." (or the slight variations of this in A-C), am I looking at the group of ALL AMERICANS WHO WORK SHORTER HOURS AT THEIR JOB TO PROVIDE CARE, and taking one out of five of THEM?

OR, am I looking at *all* American workers, and saying '20% of those workers work shorter hours to provide care.'

Basically, is the meaning:

"20% of the (Americans who work shorter hours to provide care) save society millions"

OR

"20% of Americans--the number of people who work shorter hours to provide care--save society millions."

A, B, C are ambiguous on this (I sort of lean towards it meaning the former!)... but truth be told it seems like both are wrong! I don't think we're saying *only* 20% of the short-hour-working-to-provide-care group saves millions, I think we're saying that whole *group* saves millions. I also don't think we really mean to say that a full 20% of ALL AMERICANS is the group of people who work shorter hours.

D clears up both issues. It points out we're talking about 20% of all *employees*, not 20% of all *Americans*; it specifies these people are the group that work shorter hours to provide care; and thus these people save society millions.
User avatar
Mavisdu1017
Joined: 10 Aug 2021
Last visit: 04 Jan 2023
Posts: 360
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 226
Posts: 360
Kudos: 46
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ReedArnoldMPREP
Mavisdu1017
Hello expert,
This question really confused me. I found the official explanation is different from what the expert said.
Especially in D, it uses “at a job” while the subject and verb use plural form, so experts could you illuminate each choice? Much thanks.

I agree, I think I would prefer plural 'jobs' in D. However, we have to take the best of what is given.

Also, I think Andrew's explanation above is prudent:

AndrewN
Namangupta1997
Hi AndrewN

I was able to narrow down to A and D. S-V agreement is correct in both. As the GMAT generally prefers a more succinct answer choice, I went for A.

Having read your explanation, I have a query : You mentioned the use of "job" may not be correct in A. But the singular "job" is used in option D as well.
So what exactly makes A inferior ? Is it because option D uses "a job" ? Maybe that makes it free from subtle errors? From a grammatical standpoint, I couldn't point out any glaring errors in option A.
Good question, Namangupta1997. The difference, believe it or not, comes down to what precedes the word job: a job conveys only that the Americans in question are working; their job suggests either that these Americans share the same occupation, or, if that interpretation is not intended, that an s is missing from the end of the word. People work at their [respective] jobs, not at their job. The generic article a is a safer bet, in terms of meaning.

Thank you for thinking to follow up. Good luck with your studies.

- Andrew

One thing I will add about A-C that I don't think I've seen mentioned (though I might have missed it in my quick scan through the long discussions on this topic) is that there is some meaning ambiguity with the modifier of the 'one in five americans.'

If I say "One in five Americans who work shorter hours at their job to provide care..." (or the slight variations of this in A-C), am I looking at the group of ALL AMERICANS WHO WORK SHORTER HOURS AT THEIR JOB TO PROVIDE CARE, and taking one out of five of THEM?

OR, am I looking at *all* American workers, and saying '20% of those workers work shorter hours to provide care.'

Basically, is the meaning:

"20% of the (Americans who work shorter hours to provide care) save society millions"

OR

"20% of Americans--the number of people who work shorter hours to provide care--save society millions."

A, B, C are ambiguous on this (I sort of lean towards it meaning the former!)... but truth be told it seems like both are wrong! I don't think we're saying *only* 20% of the short-hour-working-to-provide-care group saves millions, I think we're saying that whole *group* saves millions. I also don't think we really mean to say that a full 20% of ALL AMERICANS is the group of people who work shorter hours.

D clears up both issues. It points out we're talking about 20% of all *employees*, not 20% of all *Americans*; it specifies these people are the group that work shorter hours to provide care; and thus these people save society millions.

ReedArnoldMPREP Yes your explanation is reasonable. I was stuck between A and D, and I also found they are in different meaning. But nobody mentioned the issue of the meaning, so I thought I were wrong. Thank you expert.
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,511
 [1]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,511
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mavisdu1017
ReedArnoldMPREP Yes your explanation is reasonable. I was stuck between A and D, and I also found they are in different meaning. But nobody mentioned the issue of the meaning, so I thought I were wrong. Thank you expert.
Hello, Mavisdu1017. You made the sort of request I like to see in the forum. You harbored a suspicion about something, but no one had touched on the matter, so you sought an Expert opinion. Keep in mind, Experts may not always see the same issues in a given set of answer choices. It does not make one Expert right or wrong when someone else comes along and points something out. There is often more than one way to look at (in this case) a sentence. I happen to enjoy it when some new consideration is added to the dialogue for all to read and ponder.

Good luck with your studies.

- Andrew
User avatar
Mavisdu1017
Joined: 10 Aug 2021
Last visit: 04 Jan 2023
Posts: 360
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 226
Posts: 360
Kudos: 46
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AndrewN
Mavisdu1017
ReedArnoldMPREP Yes your explanation is reasonable. I was stuck between A and D, and I also found they are in different meaning. But nobody mentioned the issue of the meaning, so I thought I were wrong. Thank you expert.
Hello, Mavisdu1017. You made the sort of request I like to see in the forum. You harbored a suspicion about something, but no one had touched on the matter, so you sought an Expert opinion. Keep in mind, Experts may not always see the same issues in a given set of answer choices. It does not make one Expert right or wrong when someone else comes along and points something out. There is often more than one way to look at (in this case) a sentence. I happen to enjoy it when some new consideration is added to the dialogue for all to read and ponder.

Good luck with your studies.

- Andrew
AndrewN hello expert, in this case honestly I couldn’t be convinced to rule out A just because “their job”, cuz in D “job” is also in singular form, so I must have to find another rationale to justify D.
But I don’t mean to judge any Expert is right or wrong, and I’m not to offend you. It is just because this expert think the the same with me, that’s why I said “reasonable”. Pls understand.
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,511
 [3]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,511
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mavisdu1017
AndrewN hello expert, in this case honestly I couldn’t be convinced to rule out A just because “their job”, cuz in D “job” is also in singular form, so I must have to find another rationale to justify D.
But I don’t mean to judge any Expert is right or wrong, and I’m not to offend you. It is just because this expert think the the same with me, that’s why I said “reasonable”. Pls understand.
Hello again, Mavisdu1017. I think you misinterpreted my post, which was meant as a compliment to you for broaching a topic that had not come up in the thread. I wanted to encourage you to continue to do so, since your query and any pertinent response to it will add to the community dialogue on a question. You did not offend me in any way, and neither did Reed for writing the response he did. I especially appreciated that you had taken the time to look at the earlier posts in the thread. It is not uncommon to see Expert reply requests come through regarding concerns that have been addressed multiple times by others.

Stay curious.

- Andrew
User avatar
gmatimothy
Joined: 18 Apr 2022
Last visit: 19 Dec 2022
Posts: 111
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 704
Location: United States
Posts: 111
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I know there are a number of discussions on (B), but I still don't get why Subject-verb agreement in B is wrong.

Isn't it okay to write "saves" for "one in five Americans"?

"working shorter hours at their jobs in order to provide care for an elderly relative" seems to modify "five Americans" but starting with "saves," the sentence is about "one in five Americans." 1 in 5 saves society millions of dollars. Any ideas?
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatimothy
I know there are a number of discussions on (B), but I still don't get why Subject-verb agreement in B is wrong.

Isn't it okay to write "saves" for "one in five Americans"?

"working shorter hours at their jobs in order to provide care for an elderly relative" seems to modify "five Americans" but starting with "saves," the sentence is about "one in five Americans." 1 in 5 saves society millions of dollars. Any ideas?
Agree with your interpretation. There is a big meaning issue with B. It suggests that out of every five Americans who work shorter hours at their jobs in order to provide care for an elderly relative, only one American (out of five) saves society millions of dollars.

This meaning is clearly absurd.
User avatar
gmatimothy
Joined: 18 Apr 2022
Last visit: 19 Dec 2022
Posts: 111
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 704
Location: United States
Posts: 111
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EducationAisle
gmatimothy
I know there are a number of discussions on (B), but I still don't get why Subject-verb agreement in B is wrong.

Isn't it okay to write "saves" for "one in five Americans"?

"working shorter hours at their jobs in order to provide care for an elderly relative" seems to modify "five Americans" but starting with "saves," the sentence is about "one in five Americans." 1 in 5 saves society millions of dollars. Any ideas?
Agree with your interpretation. There is a big meaning issue with B. It suggests that out of every five Americans who work shorter hours at their jobs in order to provide care for an elderly relative, only one American (out of five) saves society millions of dollars.

This meaning is clearly absurd.

Would you please clarify? To me, it makes sense that 1 in 5 Americans saves money for the society. We aren't talking about "the one in five Americans." That meaning is indeed absurd. But one in every five Americans can collectively save money.

On the other hand, (B) seems wrong because its scope of "Americans" is limited to the ones who are working shorter hours to serve the elders vs. the original meaning: that 1/5 of all employees represent those working shorter hours to care for the elders. So (B) seems to double count by saying 1 in 5 Americans who are X vs. 1 in 5 Americans are X.

AndrewN - I know you've written extensive posts on this topic, but would you please confirm if I'm thinking about this correctly?
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
 [2]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatimothy
Would you please clarify? To me, it makes sense that 1 in 5 Americans saves money for the society. We aren't talking about "the one in five Americans." That meaning is indeed absurd. But one in every five Americans can collectively save money.
B is saying: One in five Americans <working shorter hours at their jobs in order to provide care for an elderly relative> saves money.

Notice that "working shorter hours at their jobs in order to provide care for an elderly relative" is a participial phrase, modifying "five Americans" (one "grammatical clue" that we get is that this participial phrase uses the plural pronoun "their" and so, this participial phrase should be modifying a plural entity, in this case "five Americans").

So, B is suggesting: Out of every five Americans who work shorter hours at their jobs in order to provide care for an elderly relative, only "one" saves money.

This is clearly not the intended meaning.
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,511
 [1]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,511
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatimothy
Would you please clarify? To me, it makes sense that 1 in 5 Americans saves money for the society. We aren't talking about "the one in five Americans." That meaning is indeed absurd. But one in every five Americans can collectively save money.

On the other hand, (B) seems wrong because its scope of "Americans" is limited to the ones who are working shorter hours to serve the elders vs. the original meaning: that 1/5 of all employees represent those working shorter hours to care for the elders. So (B) seems to double count by saying 1 in 5 Americans who are X vs. 1 in 5 Americans are X.

AndrewN - I know you've written extensive posts on this topic, but would you please confirm if I'm thinking about this correctly?
Pardon the delay in my response, gmatimothy. To be clear, I think your interpretation is fine. I see several fine responses in the thread that discuss meaning, including the most recent by EducationAisle. I would also direct your attention to this post by ReedArnoldMPREP; this one, the OE, provided by ChiranjeevSingh; and this one by mikemcgarry. You will note that we do not all discuss the same matters, nor do we discuss the same matters in the same way. I say this often, and I will reiterate: it is okay to walk away with a correct answer without seeing every fine point that Expert X or Expert Y points out. The goal is simply to improve your understanding of the fundamentals that will lead you to reason your way to the correct answers in the future.

Thank you for thinking to follow up.

- Andrew
User avatar
Amrit441
Joined: 19 Jun 2023
Last visit: 20 Jul 2023
Posts: 5
Given Kudos: 9
Posts: 5
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
in option D, who can refer to employees or americans. I rejected D for this reason and instead chose C.
Please share your insight
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Amrit441
in option D, who can refer to employees or americans.
"approximately one-fifth of all employees" is an appositive. So, the sentence is saying:

Those Americans who work shorter hours at a job....
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
188 posts