GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 15 Feb 2019, 17:18

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in February
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526272812
Open Detailed Calendar
• \$450 Tuition Credit & Official CAT Packs FREE

February 15, 2019

February 15, 2019

10:00 PM EST

11:00 PM PST

EMPOWERgmat is giving away the complete Official GMAT Exam Pack collection worth \$100 with the 3 Month Pack (\$299)
• Free GMAT practice

February 15, 2019

February 15, 2019

10:00 PM EST

11:00 PM PST

Instead of wasting 3 months solving 5,000+ random GMAT questions, focus on just the 1,500 you need.

Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmo

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Current Student
Status: Chasing my MBB Dream!
Joined: 29 Aug 2012
Posts: 1118
Location: United States (DC)
WE: General Management (Aerospace and Defense)
Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

Updated on: 01 Nov 2018, 03:03
3
31
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

74% (01:16) correct 26% (01:27) wrong based on 949 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmosets have a hearing sensitivity remarkably similar to humans, above which the sensitivity begins to differ.

(A) Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmosets have a hearing sensitivity remarkably similar to humans

(B) Compared to humans, the hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets are remarkably similar over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz

(C) Compared to humans over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, the hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets is remarkably similar

(D) The hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets, when compared to humans over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, is remarkably similar

(E) The hearing sensitivity of monkeys, marmosets, and humans is remarkably similar over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz

Verbal Question of The Day: Day 266: Sentence Correction

Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day: E-mail | RSS

_________________

Originally posted by Gnpth on 04 Jul 2016, 03:58.
Last edited by Bunuel on 01 Nov 2018, 03:03, edited 2 times in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 2289
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Apr 2018, 20:05
4
2
Quote:
A. Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmosets have a hearing sensitivity remarkably similar to humans

(A) sounds pretty good! But it’s wrong, anyway.

For starters, the comparison is off: the phrase “monkeys and marmosets have a hearing sensitivity remarkably similar to humans…” literally compares “hearing sensitivity” to humans themselves. And that doesn’t make sense: we’d need to compare the hearing sensitivities of the various creatures.

Plus, the non-underlined portion, “above which the sensitivity begins to differ” should modify the “range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz.” Ideally, those two phrases should be next to each other, and they aren’t in (A).

So (A) is gone.

Quote:
B. Compared to humans, the hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets are remarkably similar over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz

(B) has lots of tasty problems. The comparison is still wrong: “humans” themselves are being compared to “the hearing sensitivity” of monkeys and marmosets.

There’s also a nice subject-verb error: “the hearing sensitivity… ARE remarkably similar…” Nope, that’s bad.

We can eliminate (B), too.

Quote:
C. Compared to humans over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, the hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets is remarkably similar

We still have a clean comparison error here: “compared to humans… the hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets…” Nope, that still compares humans themselves to the hearing sensitivity of these other creatures. Not cool.

(C) is out.

Quote:
D. The hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets, when compared to humans over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, is remarkably similar

Once again, it doesn’t really make sense to compare “the hearing sensitivity” to humans themselves. Basically, (D) repeats the same mistake as the previous three answer choices.

Plus, I don’t really like the use of “when” in this situation: “when compared to” suggests that the hearing sensitivities are similar only in the exact moment when they’re being compared to each other – and that really doesn’t make sense. That’s subtle, but there are a few other official GMAT questions that misuse the word “when,” so I figure that the issue deserves a quick mention.

Finally, the modifier in the non-underlined portion (“above which the sensitivity begins to differ”) should ideally be placed right next to “the range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz”. And that’s not happening in (D).

So we have lots of reasons to eliminate (D).

Quote:
E. The hearing sensitivity of monkeys, marmosets, and humans is remarkably similar over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz

This looks fine. The comparison is now clear at the beginning of the sentence: humans, monkeys, and marmosets all have similar hearing sensitivities. The non-underlined modifier (“above which the sensitivity begins to differ”) is right next to the thing it modifies (“a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz”).

_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | Instagram | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for \$29.99 | Time management on verbal

General Discussion
Manager
Joined: 22 May 2017
Posts: 120
Re: Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Apr 2018, 20:49
IMO E

The relative pronoun 'which' correctly refers to the frequency

Waiting for detailed explanation from GmatNinja

Posted from my mobile device
_________________

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't stop when you are tired , stop when you are DONE .

Intern
Joined: 26 Sep 2016
Posts: 24
Location: India
Schools: XLRI
GMAT 1: 580 Q48 V19
Re: Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Apr 2018, 22:36
Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmosets have a hearing sensitivity remarkably similar to humans, above which the sensitivity begins to differ.

A. Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmosets have a hearing sensitivity remarkably similar to humans
non underlined portion talks about frequencies- so noun modifier issue and comparing hearing sensitivity of monkeys to humans. Illogical.
B. Compared to humans, the hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets are remarkably similar over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz
Comparing humans to hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets, non sensical.
C. Compared to humans over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, the hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets is remarkably similar
Comparing humans to hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets, non sensical.
D. The hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets, when compared to humans over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, is remarkably similar
When Compared to is not idiomatic.
E. The hearing sensitivity of monkeys, marmosets, and humans is remarkably similar over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz
Correct,
Intern
Joined: 19 Jan 2018
Posts: 7
Re: Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Apr 2018, 03:46
I chose E because the other options (options A-D) inappropriately draws a comparison between ‘the hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets’ and ‘humans’.
Option E draws a comparison between ‘the hearing sensitivity of monkeys and mamosets’ and ‘the hearing sensitivity of humans’

Posted from my mobile device

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Joined: 20 Jun 2017
Posts: 92
GMAT 1: 570 Q49 V19
Re: Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Apr 2018, 04:40
A - hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets is compared to humans instead of humans'.
B, C, D- same issue as A
E - incorrect comparison eliminated.
Uses the correct form: hearing sensitivity of X, Y and Z.
The non underlined part starting from above which correctly modifies 5000 Hz.

Sent from my ONE E1003 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
VP
Status: It's near - I can see.
Joined: 13 Apr 2013
Posts: 1393
Location: India
GMAT 1: 480 Q38 V22
GPA: 3.01
WE: Engineering (Real Estate)
Re: Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Apr 2018, 04:51
Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmosets have a hearing sensitivity remarkably similar to humans, above which the sensitivity begins to differ.[/quote]

We need a numerical value before " comma + above. So A, C, and D are out. In B, S-V error.

Hence (E)

A. Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmosets have a hearing sensitivity remarkably similar to humans

B. Compared to humans, the hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets are remarkably similar over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz

C. Compared to humans over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, the hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets is remarkably similar

D. The hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets, when compared to humans over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, is remarkably similar

E. The hearing sensitivity of monkeys, marmosets, and humans is remarkably similar over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz

(E)
_________________

"Do not watch clock; Do what it does. KEEP GOING."

Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2015
Posts: 433
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V38
GPA: 3.33
Re: Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Apr 2018, 01:32
+1 for option E.

The question hinges on comparison. Logically the only comparison possible is - hearing sensitivities of humans , monkeys , and marmosets. Only option E fits the bill.
_________________

" The few , the fearless "

Manager
Joined: 26 Mar 2016
Posts: 60
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V36
GRE 1: Q166 V147
GPA: 3.3
WE: Other (Consulting)
Re: Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Apr 2018, 10:32
A,B,C,D ... all the options have comparision error. Hearing sensitivity of monkeys is compared to humans.. This is wrong.

Hence E is our option
_________________

23 Kudos left to unlock next level. Help me by Contributing one for cause .. Please

My failed GMAT experience ... https://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-bad-experience-640-need-suggestions-on-verbal-improvement-251308.html

My review on EmpowerGMAT : https://gmatclub.com/reviews/comments/empowergmat-online-course-345355767

Manager
Joined: 15 Feb 2018
Posts: 242
Re: Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Apr 2018, 13:55
GMATNinja wrote:
Plus, I don’t really like the use of “when” in this situation: “when compared to” suggests that the hearing sensitivities are similar only in the exact moment when they’re being compared to each other – and that really doesn’t make sense. That’s subtle, but there are a few other official GMAT questions that misuse the word “when,” so I figure that the issue deserves a quick mention.

GMATNinja, I don't understand this. It seems that 'when' is being used to mean 'in what circumstances'; that circumstance being compared to human hearing sensitivity within that defined range. Using different ranges, say 6000-7000, may not be comparable. Do you have other examples handy to explain misuse?
Intern
Joined: 08 Aug 2017
Posts: 20
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V28
GMAT 2: 690 Q48 V37
GPA: 4
Re: Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Apr 2018, 05:18
Hi, Isn't there a subtle meaning change in option E? It seems that the comparison is between the hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets with that of humans. But as E is worded, it seems to compare the hearing sensitivity of the 3 -> monkeys vs. marmosets vs. humans. For example, we could infer the meaning that above 5kHz, the hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets starts to differ, whereas it seems to me thats not what the original intent (Monkeys/Marmosets hearing vs. Hearing of humans) was.
Manager
Joined: 20 Jun 2017
Posts: 92
GMAT 1: 570 Q49 V19
Re: Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Apr 2018, 06:32
vvijay26 wrote:
Hi, Isn't there a subtle meaning change in option E? It seems that the comparison is between the hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets with that of humans. But as E is worded, it seems to compare the hearing sensitivity of the 3 -> monkeys vs. marmosets vs. humans. For example, we could infer the meaning that above 5kHz, the hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets starts to differ, whereas it seems to me thats not what the original intent (Monkeys/Marmosets hearing vs. Hearing of humans) was.

I concur with what you said, option E indeed implies that above 5,000 Hz the hearing sensitivity of monkeys, marmosets and humans starts to differ. GMAT doesn't ask you to preserve the original meaning, so you can play around with the original meaning as long as it conveys a logical and grammatically correct idea.
There are some glaring errors in other options:
1) "above which the sensitivity begins to differ" - seems to modify humans - INCORRECT
2) Humans compared to hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets - INCORRECT
3) Humans compared to hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets - INCORRECT
4) Humans compared to hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets - INCORRECT
5) This correctly compares the hearing sensitivities of monkeys, marmosets and humans and as you pointed out this sentence conveys the idea that above 5,000 hz the hearing sensitivities of all the 3 starts to differ - CORRECT
Manager
Joined: 04 Dec 2016
Posts: 99
Re: Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Apr 2018, 07:20
vvijay26 wrote:
Hi, Isn't there a subtle meaning change in option E? It seems that the comparison is between the hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets with that of humans. But as E is worded, it seems to compare the hearing sensitivity of the 3 -> monkeys vs. marmosets vs. humans. For example, we could infer the meaning that above 5kHz, the hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets starts to differ, whereas it seems to me thats not what the original intent (Monkeys/Marmosets hearing vs. Hearing of humans) was.

The hearing sensitivity
of
monkeys,
marmosets,
and humans
is remarkably similar over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz

Hope it helps,
BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1219
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Apr 2018, 10:10
Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmosets have a hearing sensitivity remarkably similar to humans, above which the sensitivity begins to differ.

A. Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmosets have a hearing sensitivity remarkably similar to humans --Incorrect comparison between sensitivity and humans

B. Compared to humans, the hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets are remarkably similar over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz --Incorrect comparison between sensitivity and humans

C. Compared to humans over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, the hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets is remarkably similar --Incorrect comparison between sensitivity and humans

D. The hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets, when compared to humans over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, is remarkably similar --Incorrect comparison between sensitivity and humans

E. The hearing sensitivity of monkeys, marmosets, and humans is remarkably similar over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz --Correct
_________________
Director
Joined: 02 Oct 2017
Posts: 734
Re: Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 May 2018, 19:39
Non underline part contains text "above which ... Differ"

Means just before that we need something so that it makes perfect sense with it

B and E does exactly that

B is incorrect as humans are compared with hearing capacity of monkeys so E is correct

Posted from my mobile device
_________________

Give kudos if you like the post

Manager
Joined: 02 Aug 2017
Posts: 55
Concentration: Strategy, Nonprofit
Schools: ISB '20
GPA: 3.71
Re: Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

31 Jul 2018, 19:18
souvik101990 wrote:

Verbal Question of The Day: Day 266: Sentence Correction

Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day: E-mail | RSS

Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmosets have a hearing sensitivity remarkably similar to humans, above which the sensitivity begins to differ.

(A) Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmosets have a hearing sensitivity remarkably similar to humans

(B) Compared to humans, the hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets are remarkably similar over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz

(C) Compared to humans over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, the hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets is remarkably similar

(D) The hearing sensitivity of monkeys and marmosets, when compared to humans over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, is remarkably similar

(E) The hearing sensitivity of monkeys, marmosets, and humans is remarkably similar over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz

Every question of the day will be followed by an expert reply by GMATNinja in 12-15 hours. Stay tuned! Post your answers and explanations to earn kudos.

The hearing sensitivity of monkeys, marmosets, and humans is remarkably similar over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz....

Could anyone please explain the use of singular verb 'is',in this correct answer choice, for referring to sensitivity of three animals?

Posted from my mobile device
_________________

Everything is in flux, nothing stays still

MGMAT1 :590 Q42 V30 (07/07/18)
VERITAS :660 Q48 V33 (16/07/18)
GMATPREP1 :690 Q46 V36 (22/07/18)
GMATPREP2 :740 Q51 V39 (06/08/18)
ECONOMIST :740 Q49 V44 (11/08/18)
KAPLAN :690 Q49 V36 (17/08/18)
PRINCETON :690 Q48 V38 (26/08/18)
MGMAT2 :720 Q43 V45 (02/09/18)

Manager
Joined: 20 Feb 2015
Posts: 74
Re: Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

31 Jul 2018, 21:00
The subject here is "hearing sensitivity" - singular, hence singular verb "is".
_________________

You miss 100% of the shots you don't take..

Manager
Joined: 02 Aug 2017
Posts: 55
Concentration: Strategy, Nonprofit
Schools: ISB '20
GPA: 3.71
Re: Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Aug 2018, 01:50
SWAT09 wrote:
The subject here is "hearing sensitivity" - singular, hence singular verb "is".

Why 'hearing sensitivity' of three animals is singular? Why isn't it used in plural form i.e. sensitivities??

Posted from my mobile device
_________________

Everything is in flux, nothing stays still

MGMAT1 :590 Q42 V30 (07/07/18)
VERITAS :660 Q48 V33 (16/07/18)
GMATPREP1 :690 Q46 V36 (22/07/18)
GMATPREP2 :740 Q51 V39 (06/08/18)
ECONOMIST :740 Q49 V44 (11/08/18)
KAPLAN :690 Q49 V36 (17/08/18)
PRINCETON :690 Q48 V38 (26/08/18)
MGMAT2 :720 Q43 V45 (02/09/18)

Manager
Joined: 20 Feb 2015
Posts: 74
Re: Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Aug 2018, 02:06
Blackishmamba wrote:
SWAT09 wrote:
The subject here is "hearing sensitivity" - singular, hence singular verb "is".

Why 'hearing sensitivity' of three animals is singular? Why isn't it used in plural form i.e. sensitivities??

Posted from my mobile device

words in prepositional phrases do not serve as subjects, except when quantity is expressed.
ex. The box of nails is on the table. The pack of cards is on the floor... subjects are box and pack.

Exception : When expressing quantity,
ex. Some of the stones, which were thrown by Sam in Thames, were round in shape.
_________________

You miss 100% of the shots you don't take..

Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4682
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Aug 2018, 08:40
Top Contributor
Can we count sensitivity as one sensitivity, two sensitivities, and three sensitivities? Can we say that we have two sensitivities, one in the morning and another in the evening? Sensitivity is the generic name given to the kind of general feeling that emanates within us. It is similar to hunger, appetite or anger and we do not say we have hungers, appetites, or angers.
_________________

GMAT coaching under able guidance is only half expensive and time-consuming as a self-study in the final reckoning

Re: Over a range of frequencies from 100 to 5,000 hertz, monkeys and marmo   [#permalink] 01 Aug 2018, 08:40

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 21 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by