betterscore wrote:
Physician: The hormone melatonin has shown promise as a medication for sleep disorders when taken in synthesized form. Because the long-term side effects of synthetic melatonin are unknown, however, I cannot recommend its use at this time.
Patient: Your position is inconsistent with your usual practice. You prescribe many medications that you know have serious side effects, so concern about side effects cannot be the real reason you will not prescribe melatonin.
The patient's argument is flawed because it fails to consider that
(A) the side effects of synthetic melatonin might be different from those of naturally produced melatonin
(B) it is possible that the physician does not believe that melatonin has been conclusively shown to be effective
(C) sleep disorders, if left untreated, might lead to serious medical complications
(D) the side effects of a medication can take some time to manifest themselves
(E) known risks can be weighed against known benefits, but unknown risks cannot
Melatonin
Step 1: Identify the QuestionThe word
flawed in the question stem indicates that this is a
Find the Flaw question. Flaw questions are closely related to Weaken questions with one big difference:
Weaken questions will contain the language
if true, while Flaw questions will NOT.
Step 2: Deconstruct the ArgumentDr: M = effective, BUT: side effects unknown → can’t prescribe
Pa: you prescribe other meds w/ side effects → why not M?
The physician’s argument is this: M’s side effects are unknown, so he can’t recommend using it. The patient counters this argument by claiming that the physician must actually have some other reason to avoid prescribing M. The physician prescribes other medications that have serious side effects, so unknown side effects aren’t (according to the patient) a valid excuse.
Step 3: Pause and State the GoalOn
Flaw questions, the goal is to find an answer choice that
undermines one of the argument’s assumptions. What is the patient overlooking or what bad assumption is he making in drawing his conclusion?.
Step 4: Work from Wrong to Right(A) Unless the argument also provides information about natural melatonin, knowing that the two types of melatonin are different from each other doesn’t affect the argument, which is purely about synthetic melatonin.
(B) This answer choice states that there is another reason that the physician chooses not to prescribe melatonin—he is concerned about its efficacy, rather than its safety. However, this isn’t something that the patient has failed to consider. In fact, this type of issue is exactly what the patient is concerned about.
(C) Failing to consider the serious medical consequences of sleep disorders is a criticism that would be more appropriately levied at the physician than the patient.
(D) The argument deals only with which side effects a medication has, not the time frame in which those side effects make themselves known.
(E) CORRECT. The doctor’s argument specifically regards the
unknown side effects of melatonin. In the patient’s response, he draws an analogy between melatonin and other medications with known serious side effects. In doing so, the patient assumes—perhaps incorrectly—that known and unknown side effects should be treated in the same way.