jabhatta2
^^^
Quote:
(Analogy - B) it is easier for Andrew to teach Sally than to establish a relationship with Sally.
(Analogy - C) It is easy for Andrew to teach Sally rather than to establish a relationship with Sally
In the case of B - we are comparing
ease on a gradient scale (out of 10) - Ease of establishing a relationship is level 4 whereas Ease of teaching Sally is level 8.
In the case of C - we not comparing 'ease' on a gradient scale. .. in sentence C - we are saying - Andrew finds it easy to teach Sally whereas Andrew found it '
hard' or "not easy" to establish a relationship with Sally .
I think the intended meaning by the author is to compare 'relative ease' (on a gradient scale) -- thus I eliminated C
jabhatta2
Hi
AndrewN - between B and C - how come you were so sure NOT to focus on the difference between
easy vs
easier, specifically ?
I thought
Easier was preferred to
Easy because we are talking about a comparison (thus eliminating A and C)
To me, the difference between
than vs
rather than is zero.
If i draw a simple analogy - i
think these sentences are different.
Quote:
(B) it is easier for Andrew to teach Sally than to teach Ron.
(C) It is easy for Andrew to teach Sally rather than to teach Ron
In the case of B - we are comparing
ease on a gradient scale (out of 10) - Ease of teaching Ron is level 4 whereas Ease of teaching Sally is level 8.
In the case of C - we not comparing 'ease' on a gradient scale. .. in sentence C - we are saying - Andrew found it easy to teach Sally whereas Andrew found it '
hard' or "not easy" to teach Ron.
I think the intended meaning by the author is to compare 'relative ease' (on a gradient scale) -- thus I eliminated C
Hello,
jabhatta2. I think you would benefit from simplifying your approach to questions. From the times we have crossed paths in both the SC and CR forums, I can say that I have often written the same thing—be careful not to let a specific or narrow interpretation blind you to other possibilities. In this case, your statement at the end—
I think the intended meaning by the author is...—cannot be backed up by any evidence from the part of the sentence that is not underlined. When Experts talk about intended meaning, we point to the non-underlined portion as often as there is one, because
anything that is underlined can be negotiated. Hence, we cannot point to the contents of the underlined portion and state, definitively, that
this is what the author means to convey. That said, I agree that the author does seem to want to highlight a challenge, namely the challenge of
parenting an adolescent child. Look at the non-underlined portion:
Quote:
Parenting an adolescent child can be challenging; even experts acknowledge
The keywords
challenging,
even, and
acknowledge allow us, the readers, to anticipate further commentary on this challenge. But once a contrast enters the picture, we can only judge that contrast on its own merits, not on what the earlier part of the sentence sets up. In answer choice (C), I would probably use
would to express the same idea, but it is not incorrect to use
is. Consider:
Original—
[acknowledge] that it is easy for parents to give up rather than establish a new relationship with their teenagerTense shift—
[acknowledge] that it would be easy for parents to give up rather than establish a new relationship with their teenagerEither way, the contrast indicates that one thing is
easy to do while an alternative is not. This does
not mean that the alternative is necessarily hard or challenging, as in your sample sentence on teaching Sally and Ron, just that it is not easy. However, in
this sentence, the one at the top of the thread, we have the word
challenging to fall back on in the non-underlined portion, so the alternative,
[to] establish a new relationship with their teenager, can be seen as a challenge.
As I indicated in my earlier post, there is nothing wrong with the contrast set up in answer choice (B) either:
Quote:
it is easier for parents to give up than to establish a new relationship with their teenager
Now, the contrast is measuring the relative ease of performing one action over another, and, from the earlier part of the sentence, we can reasonably interpret the second action as
challenging. Sure, I would probably phrase the sentence this way if I were thinking to draw such a contrast, but my point earlier was that my preference does not make the other option wrong.
Your goal is not to judge what the author intends to say, but to listen, more or less, to what cannot be debated and then select an answer choice that logically and clearly and concisely links up with the other available information in the sentence.
- Andrew