Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 08:01 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 08:01
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
d999
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 06 Mar 2020
Last visit: 13 Dec 2022
Posts: 102
Own Kudos:
183
 [8]
Given Kudos: 33
Location: India
Concentration: Finance
Schools: CBS (M)
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
Products:
Schools: CBS (M)
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
Posts: 102
Kudos: 183
 [8]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 11,238
Own Kudos:
43,709
 [3]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,238
Kudos: 43,709
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Mayankcadbury
Joined: 20 Jun 2020
Last visit: 06 Oct 2020
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 41
Posts: 13
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Louis14
Joined: 01 Nov 2019
Last visit: 04 Nov 2023
Posts: 249
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 472
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V34
GPA: 3.56
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V34
Posts: 249
Kudos: 125
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u
Placerville's soccer team won one third of its first 18 games and one half of the rest of its games. What was the total number of games played?

So team won \(18*\frac{1}{3}+\frac{x}{2}\), where x is the remaining games.

(1) The soccer team won a total of 9 games.
So \(18*\frac{1}{3}+\frac{x}{2}=8....6+\frac{x}{2}=8......x=4\)
Total games = 18+4=22
Suff

(2) The soccer team lost at least 5/8 of its total games.
So \(18*\frac{1}{3}+\frac{x}{2}<\frac{3}{8}(18+x)........8(6+\frac{x}{2})<3(18+x)....48+4x<54+3x....x<6\)
So x can be 2 or 4..
However we do not require to get into calculations if we are short of time, as an inequality will generally not give us a specific value.
Insuff

A

Wouldn't x be less than or "equal to" 6 because the statement uses the word "at least"? So, in that case, x could be 2, 4, or 6. The answer would still be A though.
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,145
Own Kudos:
10,990
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,145
Kudos: 10,990
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATASSASIN770
Placerville's soccer team won one third of its first 18 games and one half of the rest of its games. What was the total number of games played?

(1) The soccer team won a total of 9 games.

(2) The soccer team lost at least 5/8 of its total games.

There are some typos in chetan's solution above (for example in Statement 1, he solves as if the team won 8 games, instead of 9).

The team won 6 of its first 18 games. Using Statement 1, if the team won 9 games in total, it won 3 games in the remaining part of the year. Since it won half of its games in that part of the year, it played 6 games to end the year, and thus 18+6 = 24 games in total. So Statement 1 is sufficient.

For Statement 2, we know the team lost 2/3 of its games early in the year, and 1/2 of its games late in the year. So overall, it lost somewhere between 2/3 and 1/2 of its games. Overall the team lost at least 5/8 of its games. Now, 5/8 is much closer to 2/3 than it is to 1/2, so the team must have played a lot more games when it was losing 2/3 of them than when it was losing 1/2 of them. So in the second part of the year, only a small number of games were played. You could just test some small even numbers for the number of remaining games (2 and 4 say) to prove that different numbers of games are possible. But you don't even need to do that. Since the Statements must be logically consistent, the lone solution from Statement 1 absolutely must work when we use Statement 2 alone. So it's possible only 6 games were played to end the year. But then if only 4 or 2 games were played to end the year, the fraction of games the team lost will be even closer to 2/3, so those must also be possible, and Statement 2 is not sufficient.
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 11,238
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,238
Kudos: 43,709
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IanStewart
GMATASSASIN770
Placerville's soccer team won one third of its first 18 games and one half of the rest of its games. What was the total number of games played?

(1) The soccer team won a total of 9 games.

(2) The soccer team lost at least 5/8 of its total games.

There are some typos in chetan's solution above (for example in Statement 1, he solves as if the team won 8 games, instead of 9).

The team won 6 of its first 18 games. Using Statement 1, if the team won 9 games in total, it won 3 games in the remaining part of the year. Since it won half of its games in that part of the year, it played 6 games to end the year, and thus 18+6 = 24 games in total. So Statement 1 is sufficient.

For Statement 2, we know the team lost 2/3 of its games early in the year, and 1/2 of its games late in the year. So overall, it lost somewhere between 2/3 and 1/2 of its games. Overall the team lost at least 5/8 of its games. Now, 5/8 is much closer to 2/3 than it is to 1/2, so the team must have played a lot more games when it was losing 2/3 of them than when it was losing 1/2 of them. So in the second part of the year, only a small number of games were played. You could just test some small even numbers for the number of remaining games (2 and 4 say) to prove that different numbers of games are possible. But you don't even need to do that. Since the Statements must be logically consistent, the lone solution from Statement 1 absolutely must work when we use Statement 2 alone. So it's possible only 6 games were played to end the year. But then if only 4 or 2 games were played to end the year, the fraction of games the team lost will be even closer to 2/3, so those must also be possible, and Statement 2 is not sufficient.

Thanks Ian. Yes, there were two typos. Edited
avatar
dhruvrao
Joined: 02 Jul 2021
Last visit: 02 May 2023
Posts: 5
Given Kudos: 62
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
Posts: 5
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IanStewart
GMATASSASIN770
Placerville's soccer team won one third of its first 18 games and one half of the rest of its games. What was the total number of games played?

(1) The soccer team won a total of 9 games.

(2) The soccer team lost at least 5/8 of its total games.

There are some typos in chetan's solution above (for example in Statement 1, he solves as if the team won 8 games, instead of 9).

The team won 6 of its first 18 games. Using Statement 1, if the team won 9 games in total, it won 3 games in the remaining part of the year. Since it won half of its games in that part of the year, it played 6 games to end the year, and thus 18+6 = 24 games in total. So Statement 1 is sufficient.

For Statement 2, we know the team lost 2/3 of its games early in the year, and 1/2 of its games late in the year. So overall, it lost somewhere between 2/3 and 1/2 of its games. Overall the team lost at least 5/8 of its games. Now, 5/8 is much closer to 2/3 than it is to 1/2, so the team must have played a lot more games when it was losing 2/3 of them than when it was losing 1/2 of them. So in the second part of the year, only a small number of games were played. You could just test some small even numbers for the number of remaining games (2 and 4 say) to prove that different numbers of games are possible. But you don't even need to do that. Since the Statements must be logically consistent, the lone solution from Statement 1 absolutely must work when we use Statement 2 alone. So it's possible only 6 games were played to end the year. But then if only 4 or 2 games were played to end the year, the fraction of games the team lost will be even closer to 2/3, so those must also be possible, and Statement 2 is not sufficient.

Hey Ian, thanks for the quick trick. I have one question though, can we avoid all kinds of calculations for statement 2 as it tells us only about the games lost. And 2/3 and 1/2 games that were not won could comprise games both lost and drawn?
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,600
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,600
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105420 posts
496 posts