GAngstA wrote:
please explain paragraph in simple word...
The passage is indeed difficult for non-native speakers like us to understand without historical context, however, a detailed INFORMAL analysis of the passage would be something like this:
1. Planter-Legislators(
White Landowners who were lawmakers ) enacted some laws with
the intent of getting their agricultural profits back.
2. Hoping that everything will go as planned, they went on to Merchants for credit purchases.
3. Planter-legislators also hoped that they will
INDIRECTLY get back their former slaves(
Black Slaves, poor in general ) to work on their lands.
4. Planter-legislators imagined a return of Pre-Civil War Economic status, wherein they used to get these Black Slaves from Europe and used to make them work as labourers (
transatlantic slave trade, ended by Civil War )
5. The whole plan fails when these Lien Laws take a U-Turn from their intent.
6. The Former Slaves get on agreement with Merchants to start their
own farming , independent of Planter-Legislators, seeking to live a free life.
7. Hence,
Lien laws, the centerpiece of a system designed to create a dependent labor force, became the means for workers, with alternative means of supply advances, to escape that dependence. Hope it helps !
PS: If something in my above answer seems racist please feel free to DM, I'll remove it. I've taken utmost care for the interpretation to be free of racism/bias. Black Lives Matter !