Venkat000095
Hi Experts,
I recently took the GMAT and scored a 730 (Q50 V38). I felt that I had done the test much better - I was expecting 750 plus. Hence, I decided to buy the ESR for the test. A few details from the ESR look strange - I scored a V38 with only 4 counted questions wrong. The SC sectional score is 35 - This is abysmally low given that I got only one of the counted questions wrong. I had to guess my last SC question because of lack of time, and from the timer stats of the last section, there is a high probability that I got this question wrong.
I understand that the GMAT is a remarkable test, but perfection is impossible in almost anything that humans have built. From this ESR, it looks like I have a reasonable case to request GMAC to reevaluate my test. Please give your thoughts and suggest the next course of action.
PS - I have retaken the test to get myself off the waitlist.
Sorry that I'm late to the party,
Venkat000095! I don't think I have anything terribly useful to say at this point, but it's definitely an interesting ESR -- not the sort of thing that we see every day.
It's definitely unfortunate to miss only 4 questions and get a 38V, especially since you were perfect in the 1st quarter of the section. That really doesn't happen very often. Basically, the difficulty level of the questions barely increased, even though you were perfect in the first quarter of the verbal section, and didn't miss many questions after that.
Why did that happen? My hunch is that the question bank didn’t happen to have enough difficult questions in it, so the difficulty stayed relatively flat in your case. The same thing often happens in some of the mba.com tests (usually tests #3-6), for better or worse.
Is it worth asking for a re-grade? There’s no harm in asking, but it’s very unlikely to change anything. (In theory, they could also revise your score downwards, but score revisions are exceedingly rare in either direction — so in all likelihood, nothing at all will happen.)
I frankly don’t like what happened to you here — it feels like you deserved a shot at the harder questions. But the test’s algorithm can compute your score in exactly the same way, even though it didn’t give you hard questions in the ways that I would typically expect. So technically speaking, your score is probably “correct”, even though the experience itself was pretty atypical.
On SC, I think you’re just seeing a particularly dramatic version of the same general phenomenon. You didn’t see terribly difficult questions on the verbal section, fairly or unfairly. If the one SC question you missed was fairly easy — and the ones you got right weren’t very hard, either — it makes sense that your SC subscore wouldn’t be all that high. Again: it doesn’t feel fair that you didn’t see harder questions. But in theory, you could get 100% of the SC questions correct and get an even LOWER score, as long as the questions were super-easy.
Fun times. Welcome to computer adaptive testing, ladies and gentlemen!
Bottom line: I would probably ask for the re-grade, just to see what they say. And obviously, you’ll want to retake if you haven’t already. All signs point to the idea that you'll have a good chance at a higher score on a different day.
Sorry that you went through such an odd verbal section, and thank you for sharing such an interesting ESR!