Maheshkv
Hi AjiteshArun,
Thanks I'll try to find the other table you mentioned but ideally shouldn't both be the same? This would create a lot of confusion among students and Bschools too. I honestly don't know how easy is it on B schools how to account for all these minor nuances
Hi Maheshkv,
I don't know how the tables were developed, but generally, we shouldn't assume that X -> Y is always perfectly reversible. For example, let's say that someone who gets a perfect score (100%!) on a very,
very difficult math test can get a Q51 on the GMAT. Going the other way is more risky though. Should we say that {100% -> Q51} means {Q51 -> 100%}? Even percentiles won't help. It's entirely possible that Q51 test takers wouldn't manage even (say) a 10% on the very, very tough math test.
As for your other point, I know that some instructors and admissions professionals are raising major doubts about this. I respect their opinion, but I don't believe that admissions officers at good bschools are basically incompetent dinosaurs.