Interesting Read.
Passage map: Anole lizard variations
P1: To intro, question and briefly discuss evolutionary phenomenon of Anole lizards and
P2: To explain one potential cause for the phenomenon
P3: To caveat explanation with another reasoning - independent evolution
P4: To provide reliable evidence validating one form of reasoning - Independent evolution
Q1 - Main Idea/ PurposeA- incorrect. Per map above.
B - Incorrect. Its not behaviour but evolution we are accounting for
C - No two types of evidence are given. Two theories are given.
D - Correct. The question is raised in P1 - "Why are the lizards so similar across different islands?"
E - Incorrect. What trait? We are told of evolutions e.g. stocky + long legs, but no general trait to all lizards.
Q2 - Main Idea/ PurposeThe highlighted text points out a "striking" point of interest about the lizards - the same 3 types of specialists occur across different geographies. The information about the new geographies is new information.
A - No. The first sentence merely describes the evolutionary traits of the specialists. Sentence 2 doesn't raise a question at all.
B - Correct. This new information is a fact and if you look at the Passage map you will see that the subsequent paragraph attempts to explain this fact, and then finally in P4 conclusive evidence is given to account for this fact.
C - Incorrect - No other lizard species are mentioned.
D - no. What aspect? Habitat use is described in terms of the specialisations, but no specific specialty is pointed out for discussion.
E - No. Look at P4 - it gives DNA as evidence to substantiate for the peculiarity made by the highlighted sentence.
Q3 - InferenceWhat's true of TWO OF THE SAME Speciality Lizards?
Before we go through the answers, here's what we know:
- they aren't related to each other as evidenced by dissimilar DNA
- they're similar habitat use and specialisations are so close that researchers think the species are related.
- they are stocky with long legs (p1)
A - Correct
B - no. They are 'stocky' but have long legs - meaning their torso would be stocky
C - No. we cannot infer this from the information given. We only know that they are similar
D - No. Opposite - they are actually similar.
E - No. As proven by the DNA they are not.
Q4 - InferenceThe question brings to light a forecasted scenario discussed in P2
A - P4 disproves this theory by the DNA test, so if the theory is true then the DNA would be similar, not dissimilar.
B - No. The specialist lizards share commonalities with other specialists
C - False. We know the whole reason for this article is to account for the similarities. Same logic applies to E
D - Yes. P2 states "the isolated lizard populations would have become distinct species while also retaining their ancestors' niche adaptations" if current day lizards shared the same DNA (i.e. were descendants)
E - No- habitat use and morphology would be very similar if not the same