|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 15 Nov 2005
Posts: 242
Location: Italy
|
Prior to 1965 geologists assumed that the two giant rock plates meetin [#permalink]
Show Tags
 19 Jul 2006, 03:08
5
This post received
KUDOS
15
This post was
BOOKMARKED
E
Question Stats:
59% (01:58) correct
 41% (01:31) wrong
based on 212
HideShow timer Statistics
E
Question Stats:
73% (01:15) correct
27% (00:14) wrong
based on 213
HideShow timer Statistics
E
Question Stats:
53% (01:44) correct
47% (00:34) wrong
based on 191
HideShow timer Statistics
Prior to 1965 geologists assumed that the two giant rock plates meeting at the San Andreas Fault generate heat through friction as they grind past each other, but in 1965 Henyey found that temperatures in drill holes near the fault were not as elevated as had been expected. Some geologists wondered whether the absence of friction-generated heat could be explained by the kinds of rock composing the fault. Geologists’ pre-1965 assumptions concerning heat generated in the fault were based on calculations about common varieties of rocks, such as limestone and granite; but “weaker” materials, such as clays, had already been identified in samples retrieved from the fault zone. Under normal conditions, rocks composed of clay produce far less friction than do other rock types.
In 1992 Byerlee tested whether these materials would produce friction 10 to 15 kilometers below the Earth’s surface. Byerlee found that when clay samples were subjected to the thousands of atmospheres of pressure they would encounter deep inside the Earth, they produced as much friction as was produced by other rock types. The harder rocks push against each other, the hotter they become; in other words, pressure itself, not only the rocks’ properties, affects frictional heating. Geologists therefore wondered whether the friction between the plates was being reduced by pockets of pressurized water within the fault that push the plates away from each other 1. The passage suggests which of the following regarding Henyey’s findings about temperature in the San Andreas Fault? A. Scientists have yet to formulate a definitive explanation for Henyey’s findings. B. Recent research suggests that Henyey’s explanation for the findings should be modified. C. Henyey’s findings had to be recalculated in light of Byerlee’s 1992 experiment. D. Henyey’s findings provided support for an assumption long held by geologists. E. Scientists have been unable to duplicate Henyey’s findings using more recent experimental methods. 2. The passage is primarily concerned with A. evaluating a method used to test a particular scientific hypothesis B. discussing explanations for an unexpected scientific finding C. examining the assumptions underlying a particular experiment D. questioning the validity of a scientific finding E. presenting evidence to support a recent scientific hypothesis 3. The passage mostly agree that Henyey’s findings about temperature in the San Andreas Fault made the greatest contribution in that they A. revealed an error in previous measurements of temperature in the San Andreas Fault zone B. indicated the types of clay present in the rocks that form the San Andreas Fault C. established the superiority of a particular technique for evaluating data concerning friction in the San Andreas Fault D. suggested that geologists had inaccurately assumed that giant rock plates that meet at the San Andreas Fault generate heat through friction E. confirmed geologists’ assumptions about the amount of friction generated by common varieties of rocks, such as limestone and granite
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________
“If money is your hope for independence you will never have it. The only real security that a man will have in this world is a reserve of knowledge, experience, and ability.â€
Last edited by hazelnut on 26 Jun 2017, 06:13, edited 3 times in total.
Reformatted question
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 149
WE 1: 4 years in IT
|
Re: Prior to 1965 geologists assumed that the two giant rock plates meetin [#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Mar 2010, 10:08
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Prior to 1965 geologists assumed that the two giant rock plates meeting in the San Andreas Fault generated heat through friction as they grind pas each other, but in 1965 Heyey found that temperatures in drill hoels near the fault were not as elevated as had been expected.....
Attachments
 RC_1[1].doc [140.5 KiB]
Downloaded 548 times
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Posts: 14
|
Re: Prior to 1965 geologists assumed that the two giant rock plates meetin [#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Apr 2010, 05:20
thanks ... nice passage
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 13 Apr 2010
Posts: 166
Location: singapore
Schools: Wharton,NY Stern,INSEAD,Stanford
|
Re: Prior to 1965 geologists assumed that the two giant rock plates meetin [#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Sep 2011, 22:59
Thanks. Good passage.
_________________
Regards,
Nagesh
My GMAT Study Plan: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-gmat-study-plan-112833.html
Idioms List : http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-idioms-104283.html?hilit=idioms#p813231
--------------------------------------
Consider Kudos if you like my posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Posts: 138
|
Re: Prior to 1965 geologists assumed that the two giant rock plates meetin [#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Aug 2012, 12:01
I hope someone ansvvers this one
in A it is mentioned that
A.Scientists have yet to formulate a definitive explanation for Henyey’s findings.
tthere are no Scientists mentioned in the passage then hovv can that be correct ?
The passage suggests which of the following regarding Henyey’s findings about temperature in the San Andreas Fault?
A.Scientists have yet to formulate a definitive explanation for Henyey’s findings.
B.Recent research suggests that Henyey’s explanation for the findings should be modified.
C.Henyey’s findings had to be recalculated in light of Byerlee’s 1992 experiment.
D.Henyey’s findings provided support for an assumption long held by geologists.
E.Scientists have been unable to duplicate Henyey’s findings using more recent experimental methods.
Answer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 07 Feb 2008
Posts: 63
Location: United States
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
|
Re: Prior to 1965 geologists assumed that the two giant rock plates meetin [#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Aug 2012, 14:10
My answers are A, B and D to the question: Quote: tthere are no Scientists mentioned in the passage then hovv can that be correct ?
yes, only geologists are mentioned. i think geologists need to be assumed as scientists to answer this questions. I know, but this does happen in some RC questions and I get it wrong because of that  for the last question: The passage mostly agree that Heney’s findings about temperature in the San Andreas Fault made the greatest contribution in that they A.revealed an error in previous measurements of temperature in the San Andreas Fault zone ew cannot say that there were errors in measurement, only that the previous theory was incorrect (we dont know if they actually measured it earlierB.indicated the types of clay present in the rocks that form the San Andreas Fault they did try to explain presence of clay, but types of clay - not sure if that is mentionedC.established the superiority of a particular technique for evaluating data concerning friction in the San Andreas Fault hmm, not leaning towards this one. seems to be nowhere near. where is that technique mentoined?D.suggested that geologists had inaccurately assumed that giant rock plates that meet at the San Andreas Fault generate heat through friction i dont think this is what the author wanted to say, but this is the closest. I did not like this one because the heat could be generated and dissipated immediately. nevertheless, the closest oneE.confirmed geologists’ assumptions about the amount of friction generated by common varieties of rocks, such as limestone and granite no, we do not even think these plates had rocks - so, how can we say this confirmed the friction of limestone/granite?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 199
Concentration: General Management, Operations
|
Re: Prior to 1965 geologists assumed that the two giant rock plates meetin [#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Jan 2013, 06:50
akrish1982 wrote: My answers are A, B and D to the question: Quote: tthere are no Scientists mentioned in the passage then hovv can that be correct ?
yes, only geologists are mentioned. i think geologists need to be assumed as scientists to answer this questions. I know, but this does happen in some RC questions and I get it wrong because of that for the last question: The passage mostly agree that Heney’s findings about temperature in the San Andreas Fault made the greatest contribution in that they A.revealed an error in previous measurements of temperature in the San Andreas Fault zone ew cannot say that there were errors in measurement, only that the previous theory was incorrect (we dont know if they actually measured it earlierB.indicated the types of clay present in the rocks that form the San Andreas Fault they did try to explain presence of clay, but types of clay - not sure if that is mentionedC.established the superiority of a particular technique for evaluating data concerning friction in the San Andreas Fault hmm, not leaning towards this one. seems to be nowhere near. where is that technique mentoined?D.suggested that geologists had inaccurately assumed that giant rock plates that meet at the San Andreas Fault generate heat through friction i dont think this is what the author wanted to say, but this is the closest. I did not like this one because the heat could be generated and dissipated immediately. nevertheless, the closest oneE.confirmed geologists’ assumptions about the amount of friction generated by common varieties of rocks, such as limestone and granite no, we do not even think these plates had rocks - so, how can we say this confirmed the friction of limestone/granite?But 'temperatures in drill holes near the fault were not as elevated as had been expected' Doen't this show that A is correct?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 335
|
Re: Prior to 1965 geologists assumed that the two giant rock plates meetin [#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Jan 2013, 11:04
2
This post received
KUDOS
Hi Roopika, I don't think that it does. Whilst Heyney found that temperatures were not that high, it says nowhere that anyone else had measured the temparature. The previous wisdom that temperatures were high, was not based on any actual data, just an assumption. So A is not correct. Hope that helps. James
_________________
Former GMAT Pill student, now on staff. Used GMATPILL OG 12 and nothing else: 770 (48,48) & 6.0
      
... and more
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 20 Sep 2012
Posts: 23
|
Re: Prior to 1965 geologists assumed that the two giant rock plates meetin [#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Oct 2013, 11:08
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Prior to 1965 geologists assumed that the two giant rock plates meeting at the San Andreas Fault generate heat through friction as they grind past each other, but in 1965 Henyey found that temperatures in drill holes near the fault were not as elevated as had been expected. Some geologists wondered whether the absence of friction-generated heat could be explained by the kinds of rock composing the fault. Geologists’ pre-1965 assumptions concerning heat generated in the fault were based on calculations about common varieties of rocks, such as limestone and granite; but “weaker” materials, such as clays, had already been identified in samples retrieved from the fault zone. Under normal conditions, rocks composed of clay produce far less friction than do other rock types.
In 1992 Byerlee tested whether these materials would produce friction 10 to 15 kilometers below the Earth’s surface. Byerlee found that when clay samples were subjected to the thousands of atmospheres of pressure they would encounter deep inside the Earth, they produced as much friction as was produced by other rock types. The harder rocks push against each other, the hotter they become; in other words, pressure itself, not only the rocks’ properties, affects frictional heating. Geologists therefore wondered whether the friction between the plates was being reduced by pockets of pressurized water within the fault that push the plates away from each other The passage suggests which of the following regarding Henyey’s findings about temperature in the San Andreas Fault?
A.Scientists have yet to formulate a definitive explanation for Henyey’s findings.
B.Recent research suggests that Henyey’s explanation for the findings should be modified.
C.Henyey’s findings had to be recalculated in light of Byerlee’s 1992 experiment.
D.Henyey’s findings provided support for an assumption long held by geologists.
E.Scientists have been unable to duplicate Henyey’s findings using more recent experimental methods.
Answer-A
The passage is primarily concerned with
A.evaluating a method used to test a particular scientific hypothesis
B.discussing explanations for an unexpected scientific finding
C.examining the assumptions underlying a particular experiment
D.questioning the validity of a scientific finding
E.presenting evidence to support a recent scientific hypothesis
Answer-B
The passage mostly agree that Heney’s findings about temperature in the San Andreas Fault made the greatest contribution in that they
A.revealed an error in previous measurements of temperature in the San Andreas Fault zone
B.indicated the types of clay present in the rocks that form the San Andreas Fault
C.established the superiority of a particular technique for evaluating data concerning friction in the San Andreas Fault
D.suggested that geologists had inaccurately assumed that giant rock plates that meet at the San Andreas Fault generate heat through friction
E.confirmed geologists’ assumptions about the amount of friction generated by common varieties of rocks, such as limestone and granite
Answer - D
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Status: Work hard in silence, let success make the noise
Joined: 25 Nov 2013
Posts: 160
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 540 Q50 V15 GMAT 2: 640 Q50 V27
GPA: 3.11
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
|
Re: Prior to 1965 geologists assumed that the two giant rock plates meetin [#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Dec 2013, 03:32
2
This post received
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Prior to 1965 geologists assumed that the two giant rock plates meeting at the San Andreas Fault generate heat through friction as they grind past each other, but in 1965 Henyey found that temperatures in drill holes near the fault were not as elevated as had been expected. Some geologists wondered whether the absence of friction-generated heat could be explained by the kinds of rock composing the fault. Geologists’ pre-1965 assumptions concerning heat generated in the fault were based on calculations about common varieties of rocks, such as limestone and granite; but “weaker” materials, such as clays, had already been identified in samples retrieved from the fault zone. Under normal conditions, rocks composed of clay produce far less friction than do other rock types. In 1992 Byerlee tested whether these materials would produce friction 10 to 15 kilometers below the Earth’s surface. Byerlee found that when clay samples were subjected to the thousands of atmospheres of pressure they would encounter deep inside the Earth, they produced as much friction as was produced by other rock types. The harder rocks push against each other, the hotter they become; in other words, pressure itself, not only the rocks’ properties, affects frictional heating. Geologists therefore wondered whether the friction between the plates was being reduced by pockets of pressurized water within the fault that push the plates away from each other. The passage suggests which of the following regarding Henyey’s findings about temperature in the San Andreas Fault? A.Scientists have yet to formulate a definitive explanation for Henyey’s findings. B.Recent research suggests that Henyey’s explanation for the findings should be modified. C.Henyey’s findings had to be recalculated in light of Byerlee’s 1992 experiment. D.Henyey’s findings provided support for an assumption long held by geologists. E.Scientists have been unable to duplicate Henyey’s findings using more recent experimental methods. Source - GMAT Prep OA - Can anybody help me explain this question with proper reasoning?
_________________
Sahil Chaudhary
If you find this post helpful, please take a moment to click on the "+1 KUDOS" icon.
My IELTS 7.5 Experience
From 540 to 640...Done with GMAT!!!
http://www.sahilchaudhary007.blogspot.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3215
|
Re: Prior to 1965 geologists assumed that the two giant rock plates meetin [#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Dec 2013, 11:04
2
This post received
KUDOS
sahilchaudhary wrote: Prior to 1965 geologists assumed that the two giant rock plates meeting at the San Andreas Fault generate heat through friction as they grind past each other, but in 1965 Henyey found that temperatures in drill holes near the fault were not as elevated as had been expected. Some geologists wondered whether the absence of friction-generated heat could be explained by the kinds of rock composing the fault. Geologists’ pre-1965 assumptions concerning heat generated in the fault were based on calculations about common varieties of rocks, such as limestone and granite; but “weaker” materials, such as clays, had already been identified in samples retrieved from the fault zone. Under normal conditions, rocks composed of clay produce far less friction than do other rock types. In 1992 Byerlee tested whether these materials would produce friction 10 to 15 kilometers below the Earth’s surface. Byerlee found that when clay samples were subjected to the thousands of atmospheres of pressure they would encounter deep inside the Earth, they produced as much friction as was produced by other rock types. The harder rocks push against each other, the hotter they become; in other words, pressure itself, not only the rocks’ properties, affects frictional heating. Geologists therefore wondered whether the friction between the plates was being reduced by pockets of pressurized water within the fault that push the plates away from each other. The passage suggests which of the following regarding Henyey’s findings about temperature in the San Andreas Fault? A.Scientists have yet to formulate a definitive explanation for Henyey’s findings. B.Recent research suggests that Henyey’s explanation for the findings should be modified. C.Henyey’s findings had to be recalculated in light of Byerlee’s 1992 experiment. D.Henyey’s findings provided support for an assumption long held by geologists. E.Scientists have been unable to duplicate Henyey’s findings using more recent experimental methods. Source - GMAT Prep OA - Can anybody help me explain this question with proper reasoning? Dissect the argument and boile it down to a simple scheme Now the first sentence says: basically the scientists think that the heat among the earth's plates is caused by the friction of the rocks. BUT in 1965 Henyey found that temperatures in drill holes near the fault were not as elevated as had been expected.. So after this something is weird: could not be this the real reason behind the friction and the consequent heat. Maybe is the type or quality of the rocks or clay or whatever else. Byerlee's experiment instead says just this: no matter what is the type of rock, they genarate heat. BUT pressure itself, not only the rocks’ properties, affects frictional heating. Geologists therefore wondered whether the friction between the plates was being reduced by pockets of pressurized water within the fault that push the plates away from each other.Basically this is the skeleton of the argument that you have to keep in mind to answer the question. (indeed quite tricky) just because pressure + rock's properties could be the cause of all this but we are still wondering why Is this or there is something else that we do not know ??' A fits the bill hope this helps
_________________
COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS AND RESOURCES
Quant: 1. ALL GMATPrep questions Quant/Verbal 2. Bunuel Signature Collection - The Next Generation 3. Bunuel Signature Collection ALL-IN-ONE WITH SOLUTIONS 4. Veritas Prep Blog PDF Version 5. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Quant Videos
Verbal:1. Verbal question bank and directories by Carcass 2. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Verbal Videos 3. Critical Reasoning_Oldy but goldy question banks 4. Sentence Correction_Oldy but goldy question banks 5. Reading-comprehension_Oldy but goldy question banks
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 277
GMAT 1: 620 Q44 V31 GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37 GMAT 3: 610 Q47 V28 GMAT 4: 700 Q50 V34 GMAT 5: 700 Q49 V36 GMAT 6: 690 Q48 V35 GMAT 7: 750 Q49 V42 GMAT 8: 730 Q50 V39
|
Re: Prior to 1965 geologists assumed that the two giant rock plates meetin [#permalink]
Show Tags
15 May 2014, 19:43
A is supported by the passage via last sentence.
B is not supported by the passage.
C is not supported by the passage.
D (did not have enough time to look at this one.)
E is not supported by the passage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jul 2013
Posts: 293
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34 GMAT 2: 670 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.6
WE: Brand Management (Retail)
|
Re: Prior to 1965 geologists assumed that the two giant rock plates meetin [#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Aug 2014, 23:28
Bumping up. In question 1, A talks about scientists as discussed earlier, Option B talks about recent research suggesting explanations of Heyney's finding should be modified. Isn't this option better than A, we know there are Geologist/Scientist involved but the Heyney's finding have been challenged once and now again the challenge is being challenged. Can't we infer that passage is suggesting modification?
_________________
Cheers
Farhan
My Blog - Student for Life ( Oxford MBA)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Student
Joined: 01 Feb 2013
Posts: 120
Location: India
|
Re: Prior to 1965 geologists assumed that the two giant rock plates meetin [#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Aug 2014, 23:27
Can some explain Q3
D.suggested that geologists had inaccurately assumed that giant rock plates that meet at the San Andreas Fault generate heat through friction
What I see in the passage is
"The harder rocks push against each other, the hotter they become; in other words, pressure itself, not only the rocks’ properties, affects frictional heating. "
This effectively means that two factors contributed to frictional heating
1) Rocks' properties
2) Pressure
How can option D be correct which says that the heat was not generated due to friction. Both the factors finally leads to frictional heating only.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Student
Joined: 10 Apr 2014
Posts: 39
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
|
Re: Prior to 1965 geologists assumed that the two giant rock plates meetin [#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Sep 2014, 05:07
My answers are A, B, D.
Q3 D is the correct answer because it highlights that some wrong assumptions were made about rocks generating heat due to friction. This is in sync with the passage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chat Moderator
Joined: 19 Apr 2013
Posts: 697
Concentration: Strategy, Healthcare
GPA: 4
|
Re: Prior to 1965 geologists assumed that the two giant rock plates meetin [#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Mar 2015, 04:38
Complicated passage. The last question did not convince me fully.
_________________
If my post was helpful, press Kudos. If not, then just press Kudos !!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 03 Mar 2014
Posts: 6
|
Re: Prior to 1965 geologists assumed that the two giant rock plates meetin [#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Apr 2015, 04:30
Heyy,
Q3) IMO A
While i have read plumber250's points i have the below to suggest
"Geologists’ pre-1965 assumptions concerning heat generated in the fault were based on calculations about common varieties of rocks, such as limestone and granite"
THIS CLEARLY MENTIONS - assumptions concerning the Heat generated.....i.e how hot it got was based on calculations with limestones & granite.
Hence the Geologists theorized the Temperature OR - How hot it got in the center based on Limestone / Granite rock Experiments
These Calculations were challenged by Hayney who found that temp was not as elevated.
Hence Hayneys Contribution was towards revealing an error in the previous measurements of temperature......which was measured based on calculations of Rocks theorized to be Limestones / Granite instead of clay.
Nowhere does Hayney or the Passage refute that the heat was not caused by Friction between the plates. In fact the passage suggests that the high pressure is equally important along with Properties of the rock which together increase friction & thereby the heat. The answer choice D literally questions the entire idea proposed in the passage.
am i doing something wrong here????
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2013
Posts: 75
|
Re: Prior to 1965 geologists assumed that the two giant rock plates meetin [#permalink]
Show Tags
12 May 2015, 02:49
Request the GC community to use spoilers, to conceal the answer key.
1: A. First thing to note is that Henyey just had "findings" and he did not offer an "explanation". So, B is out. His finding was that temperatures in drill holes near the fault were not as elevated as had been expected. Initially scientists thought that “weaker” materials, such as clays, were the reason for low temperatures; Byerlee proved that clay would also produce elevated temperatures. So, clearly, presence of clay did not provide an explanation to Henyey's findings". So, an alternate explanation needed to be looked at.
Geologists therefore wondered whether the friction between the plates was being reduced by pockets of pressurized water within the fault that push the plates away from each other.
The passage ends here. So, clearly this entire episode is still at a "wondering" stage. In other words, Scientists have yet to formulate a definitive explanation for Henyey’s findings.
2: B. The expectation was that two giant rock plates meeting at the San Andreas Fault would generate heat through friction. However, unexpected scientific finding was that Henyey did not find temperatures as elevated as had been expected. The whole passage that discusses explanation for this unexpected scientific finding.
3: D. First sentence of the passage is an assumption by geologists. Heney’s findings are counter to those assumptions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 20 Dec 2014
Posts: 61
|
Re: Prior to 1965 geologists assumed that the two giant rock plates meetin [#permalink]
Show Tags
12 May 2015, 02:59
Answer would be A.
Reasoning:
2nd line: but in 1965 Henyey found that temperatures in drill holes near the fault were not as elevated as had been expected.
Last line:Geologists therefore wonderedwhether the friction between the plates was being reduced by pockets of pressurized water within the fault that push the plates away from each other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 13 Aug 2015
Posts: 6
|
Re: Prior to 1965 geologists assumed that the two giant rock plates meetin [#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Aug 2015, 06:36
took 4 minutes for me to answer the passage. Got the 1st one wrong. The passage clearly states that scintists are still trying to deduce the reason for finding low-tempratures at the location of friction of plates. So isn't B a better answer choice for the 1st question ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Prior to 1965 geologists assumed that the two giant rock plates meetin
[#permalink]
18 Aug 2015, 06:36
|
|
|
|
|
Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 32 posts ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
msk0657, mikemcgarry, Abhishek009, GMATNinjaTwo, Gnpth, Nevernevergiveup, sallysea, GMATNinja, carcass, hazelnut, souvik101990, yezz, nguyendinhtuong, chetan2u, Narenn
|
7
