Hi Paul,
I have already applied to Tuck and Haas in R1 and HBS and Wharton in R2, and have been shifting my strategy a bit as I've gone through the process - still planning to submit to Stanford, Kellogg, and Stern (with Kellogg being a top choice) and would you like your advice on my approach - pardon the heavy detail.
Stats:
White male, 28 years-old at matriculation
GPA: 2.96 overall from UC Berkeley (basically flunked freshman year (1.67 GPA with an F) due to a) lack of preparedness from college and immaturity b) some serious ancillary health problems) - goes up significantly from freshman year. Also took some classes in high school at a UC school that I did poorly in (was "enrichment") that are by university policy included in my GPA (drags it down a bit - otherwise would be a 3.07 overall, though I haven't addressed that last point in essays - seems too nit-picky)
GMAT: 750 (48Q, 45V - 86%, 98%)
WE: 5 Years at matriculation:
2.5 in strategy consulting (boutique )
1 in M&A (Corporate Development) at a software company; mostly working on acquisitions; position was typically filled by ex-investment bankers
1.5 in an operating role (asked to join a company we spun off due to my experience in structuring the transaction)
Work Leadership: Lots - ran consulting projects after being promoted early; high profile on M&A deals, commissioned for projects by CEO; worldwide project ownership for major strategic initatives at spinoff company; several more
ECs: Non-profit board member (have had a lot of impact), coached inner-city basketball in Los Angeles (at elementary school level and a competitive high school program), Big Brother program, non-profit consultant (pro bono projects through the Taproot Foundation), I'm a staff writer for a travel magazine, serious amateur boxer (12 hours/week training), competitive athlete in other sports (rugby, others), chair of alumni scholarship foundation for alma mater (in charge of awarding $20K of scholarships), bunch of fraternity leadership as undergrad, some other stuff as well
Goals post MBA: My work experience as been either working for or consulting for struggling technology companies - I've identified common characteristics of leaders of those that successfully turned around - almost all are highly seasoned, have been entrepreneurs and have a unique leadership style. My goal is to become a turnaround executive fixing these companies. Post-MBA, there are two stops - 1st - running business development at a mid-sized technology company; 2nd - entrepreneurship. This paves the way and builds the necessary skills. MBA is necessary to broaden skill-base (turnaround execs have experience across sales,marketing, ops, etc.), spark idea generation (MBA experience being 2 years of constant team-based creative thinking), and develop as leader (academic framework + focused experiential opportunities)
My question (finally!): In my Tuck and Haas apps I wrote quite a bit on my medical issues - overcoming them were my most significant accomplishment, but I tried to make the point that my low GPA was due to not stepping up to the plate in college.
With Wharton, I toned down the medical issue talk but wrote the optional essay focusing mostly on lack of preparedness for college; with HBS I toned it down more by mentioning it only as my most significant accomplishment and weaving it into the global issue essay (was highly relevant).
So: Considering I've got three apps left, should I continue to tone down explaining my undergrad GPA? I'm concerned about coming off as whiny or not taking responsibility for my actions. I consider my GPA to be the really only weak point in my application, but there were extenuating circumstances and I took a lot of tough classes at school that is known for being very tough on grading.
I'm a very good writer as well so I'm not worried about readability or execution on my essays.
Also, if you think I'm overreaching on schools or if I could benefit from consulting please let me know (I already have your book).
Thanks!