Reseng,
Thanks for reaching out. I just replied to another candidate with an engineering background and recommended Ross, so it is good to see it high on your list. Great school and very appropriate for someone with a strong engineering background.
Overall, your list looks really good. The MMM program is very smart and Sloan is also a no-brainer. Booth is one of our favorite schools overall and you can never go wrong with adding Chicago to your brand. Fuqua is an interesting choice and I'd be curious to hear more about why. Not knocking Duke, but I would have probably tabbed Haas in that fifth spot.
As for your chances at all these fine institutions, I think it comes down to three things:
1. How well you can articulate your short-term goal as being both specific (therefore not run-of-the-mill) but also accessible. Even if you are uniquely qualified for something, it can put pressure on the program to help you get placed into a really niche industry, company, or practice group. Now, the MMM pipeline should be up to that task, Sloan doesn't even ask about career goals, and and you probably have a ready answer for this, but you always have to start with this. As long as you paint a clear and achievable picture, you should be in good shape.
2. Fusing the leadership from your personal life with your more technical skill in your professional life. Many schools want to see leadership come directly from your work experience, but not all jobs are created equal. You've been doing complex work that requires a lot of skill and intelligence. If you can also show that you are a natural leader and team player, it will go a long, long way, especially at Kellogg. There were will be critical essay opportunities (Kellogg's leadership essay springs immediately to mind) where you can knock this down, so be sure to take full advantage.
3. Not to put too fine a point on it, but you are going to want to bring people in with some really well-written essays. Being an engineer with a low AWA score, there's a *chance* (not saying a probability, just a chance) that you might get an admissions officer or two who thinks "one-dimensional engineering type." The best way to avoid that is to really bring some depth to any introspective essay answers and just to write really bang-up, eloquent essays. Working with someone with creative instincts (to balance your any job-fueled leanings toward brutal efficiency) is probably a good idea.
We have a lot of ways we can help, if you are interested. Happy to set up a consultation if you would like. Simply PM me and we'll get you squared away.
Respectfully,
Paul Lanzillotti