Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack
GMAT Club

 It is currently 24 Mar 2017, 01:25

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Public companies will be required to raise their governance

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 24 Nov 2010
Posts: 210
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Ross '15, Duke '15
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 7

Public companies will be required to raise their governance [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Sep 2011, 08:38
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

50% (02:18) correct 50% (00:50) wrong based on 74 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Public companies will be required to raise their governance game if they want to be able to compete against private firms

A) Public companies will be required to raise their governance game if they want to be able to compete against private firms.
B) Public companies should raise their governance game if they wish to compete with private firms.
C) Public companies would need to raise their governance game if they wish to compete against private firms.
D) Public companies have to need to raise their governance game if they are to be in competition with private firms.
E) Public companies will need to raise their governance game if they are to compete with private firms.
If you have any questions
New!
Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3755
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 758

Kudos [?]: 5876 [0], given: 324

Re: Public companies - SC Grail [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2011, 07:46
However, in E, why is the mix up of an active voice in the main clause and a passive voice in the sub clause, thus flouting the tenet of //ism?
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Manager
Joined: 24 Nov 2010
Posts: 210
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Ross '15, Duke '15
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 7

Re: Public companies - SC Grail [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2011, 07:53
The second clause is conditional right? That's why i was thinking 'would' is more appropriate in the first clause 'Public companies would need to raise'
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 06 Sep 2011
Posts: 56
GMAT 1: Q V
GRE 1: 1600 Q800 V800
GRE 2: 1600 Q800 V800
Followers: 86

Kudos [?]: 117 [5] , given: 2

Re: Public companies - SC Grail [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2011, 11:40
5
KUDOS

When an if...then sentence represents a general rule with no uncertainty, use IF present THEN present. When an if...then sentence represents a particular future case with no uncertainty, use IF present THEN future. (For other if...then constructions not relevant to this question, see the Manhattan GMAT Sentence Correction Strategy Guide, page 112-113)

For this sentence, I'd incline toward IF present THEN future, because this sentence seems to be about a particular case. I might accept IF present THEN present if all the IF present THEN future answers have other grammatical problems. So I'll eliminate C for sure, and B tentatively.

OK, for concision I'm going to choose compete over be able to compete or be in competition, so there go A and D.

That leaves E. I don't think B is terrible, but I'd have to go with E.

A small additional point: raise their...game is too colloquial for real GMAT SC.
_________________

Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Senior Manager
Status: MBAing!!!!
Joined: 24 Jun 2011
Posts: 309
Location: United States (FL)
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
GPA: 3.65
WE: Project Management (Real Estate)
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 56

Re: Public companies - SC Grail [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2011, 17:10
E is correct...B and C use "would" and "should" not correct. A is wordy and D uses "have to need".
Manager
Status: MLT Fellowship - MBA Prep
Joined: 29 Nov 2010
Posts: 173
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V38
GMAT 2: 750 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.47
WE: Sales (Retail Banking)
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 8

Re: Public companies - SC Grail [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2011, 17:24
what is the rule with "would" and "should".. are they never to be used? Or in which situatiations are they necessary?

Thanks
_________________

Brandon Hoffman

Management Leadership of Tomorrow (MLT) - MBA Programs Fellow
MLT LA Chapter - Board Member / Recruiting Officer
Net Impact - Professional Chapter Co-President
MBADiversity Organization - Global Fellow, CHINA

Senior Manager
Status: MBAing!!!!
Joined: 24 Jun 2011
Posts: 309
Location: United States (FL)
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
GPA: 3.65
WE: Project Management (Real Estate)
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 56

Re: Public companies - SC Grail [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2011, 17:49
jeprince112 wrote:
what is the rule with "would" and "should".. are they never to be used? Or in which situatiations are they necessary?

Thanks

When you have an "if...then..." construction don't use "would" in the "if" clause, and don't use "should" at all. See pg 113 in Mgmat SC book.
Manager
Joined: 17 Feb 2011
Posts: 112
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 25

Re: Public companies - SC Grail [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2011, 17:58
Thanks MichaelS for explaining.
Manager
Status: MLT Fellowship - MBA Prep
Joined: 29 Nov 2010
Posts: 173
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V38
GMAT 2: 750 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.47
WE: Sales (Retail Banking)
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 8

Re: Public companies - SC Grail [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2011, 18:31
jeprince112 wrote:
what is the rule with "would" and "should".. are they never to be used? Or in which situatiations are they necessary?

Thanks

When you have an "if...then..." construction don't use "would" in the "if" clause, and don't use "should" at all. See pg 113 in Mgmat SC book.

Thank you I think that sounds familiar now, I read that book a little while back but haven't really reviewed my notes.
_________________

Brandon Hoffman

Management Leadership of Tomorrow (MLT) - MBA Programs Fellow
MLT LA Chapter - Board Member / Recruiting Officer
Net Impact - Professional Chapter Co-President
MBADiversity Organization - Global Fellow, CHINA

Manager
Status: Retaking next month
Affiliations: None
Joined: 05 Mar 2011
Posts: 226
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V27
GPA: 3.01
WE: Sales (Manufacturing)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 119 [1] , given: 42

Re: Public companies - SC Grail [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2011, 03:37
1
KUDOS
jeprince112 wrote:
what is the rule with "would" and "should".. are they never to be used? Or in which situatiations are they necessary?

Thanks

Use will to refer to some event that will happen in the future in relation
to the present and use would to refer to the future in the past.

Should‘ is almost always used incorrectly in English to refer to an event
that will or might happen in the future. Remember that ‗should‘ is only
used to give your recommendation or suggestion.
Manager
Status: Retaking next month
Affiliations: None
Joined: 05 Mar 2011
Posts: 226
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V27
GPA: 3.01
WE: Sales (Manufacturing)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 119 [0], given: 42

Re: Public companies - SC Grail [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2011, 03:40
GMATPASSION wrote:
Straight C for me.

Arghh. Should have marked E
Manager
Joined: 17 Jul 2011
Posts: 93
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

Re: Public companies will be required to raise their governance [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Dec 2011, 22:35
I took it E... a good explanation by ARZAD. thanx..
Director
Status: Gonna rock this time!!!
Joined: 22 Jul 2012
Posts: 543
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q43 V34
GMAT 2: 630 Q47 V29
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 562

Re: Public companies - SC Grail [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Feb 2013, 22:23
MichaelS wrote:

When an if...then sentence represents a general rule with no uncertainty, use IF present THEN present. When an if...then sentence represents a particular future case with no uncertainty, use IF present THEN future. (For other if...then constructions not relevant to this question, see the Manhattan GMAT Sentence Correction Strategy Guide, page 112-113)

For this sentence, I'd incline toward IF present THEN future, because this sentence seems to be about a particular case. I might accept IF present THEN present if all the IF present THEN future answers have other grammatical problems. So I'll eliminate C for sure, and B tentatively.

OK, for concision I'm going to choose compete over be able to compete or be in competition, so there go A and D.

That leaves E. I don't think B is terrible, but I'd have to go with E.

A small additional point: raise their...game is too colloquial for real GMAT SC.

Hi Michael,
Why not B? what is wrong with it?

Also, is 'if they are to' a correct grammatical construction?
_________________

hope is a good thing, maybe the best of things. And no good thing ever dies.

Who says you need a 700 ?Check this out : http://gmatclub.com/forum/who-says-you-need-a-149706.html#p1201595

My GMAT Journey : http://gmatclub.com/forum/end-of-my-gmat-journey-149328.html#p1197992

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10666
Followers: 957

Kudos [?]: 213 [0], given: 0

Re: Public companies will be required to raise their governance [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 May 2015, 21:13
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Public companies will be required to raise their governance   [#permalink] 12 May 2015, 21:13
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
6 SEC regulations require that a public company disclose to their potent 10 12 Jan 2017, 01:38
3 Public companies will be required to raise their governance 7 28 Mar 2015, 09:38
Public companies will be required to 0 22 Jun 2014, 10:26
7 Public companies will be required to raise their governance 6 03 Apr 2014, 11:23
9 Public companies will be required to raise their governance 15 10 Oct 2012, 20:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by