Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 01:33 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 01:33
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
carcass
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,754
Own Kudos:
37,013
 [6]
Given Kudos: 4,856
Posts: 4,754
Kudos: 37,013
 [6]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,393
Own Kudos:
15,523
 [7]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,393
Kudos: 15,523
 [7]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Ross2018
Joined: 09 Dec 2016
Last visit: 14 May 2018
Posts: 104
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 60
Status:Single
Affiliations: None
GPA: 3.9
WE:Asset Management (Advertising and PR)
Products:
Posts: 104
Kudos: 53
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sleepynut
Joined: 29 Oct 2016
Last visit: 18 Jul 2017
Posts: 162
Own Kudos:
92
 [4]
Given Kudos: 905
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 620 Q50 V24
GRE 1: Q167 V147
GMAT 1: 620 Q50 V24
GRE 1: Q167 V147
Posts: 162
Kudos: 92
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,thanks for the question
Please correct me if I'm wrong. :o
The meaning is that James just walked in the bank,and at the same time he got a message about something.

(A) and that was when he got a message
-- wrong."That" can't not refer to "James had just walked into the bank"

(B) and then he got a message
-- wrong. This me James walked into the bank and then got a message.

(C) when a message was received by him
-- wrong. This is not concise.

(D) when they told him
--wrong. No antecedence for "they"

(E) when he got a message
--That's it!! "when" is an adverbial modifier
avatar
Narasimham22
Joined: 04 Feb 2016
Last visit: 01 Nov 2022
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Location: India
Posts: 4
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I feel this scenario has two possibilities:

1) James walked into the bank and received the message at the same time
2) James walked into the bank and then received the message.

The answer choice can vary depending on the possibility.

Does the adverb 'JUST' play a crucial role in understanding the context?
User avatar
chesstitans
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Last visit: 20 Nov 2019
Posts: 987
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,562
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
Posts: 987
Kudos: 1,923
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
according to Kaplan method, "when" can be only used for TIME words only.
In this question, how E is the answer.
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,393
Own Kudos:
15,523
 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,393
Kudos: 15,523
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chesstitans
according to Kaplan method, "when" can be only used for TIME words only.
In this question, how E is the answer.

"When" is referring to the time when Jim got the message. You do not need to have the time word itself in the sentence, because "when" is not necessarily a relative pronoun (referring to a time word) - it can also be used as an adverb. "When" used as an adverb does not require the time word.
User avatar
sarathgopinath
Joined: 22 Aug 2016
Last visit: 04 Feb 2025
Posts: 68
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 77
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE:Other (Education)
Products:
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
Posts: 68
Kudos: 102
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sayantanc2k
Narasimham22
I feel this scenario has two possibilities:

1) James walked into the bank and received the message at the same time
2) James walked into the bank and then received the message.

The answer choice can vary depending on the possibility.

Does the adverb 'JUST' play a crucial role in understanding the context?

In this case the past perfect "had walked" makes the use of "when" necessary.

James walked into the bank and then received the message... correct (Walking into happened before receiving)
James had walked into the bank when he received the message... correct. (Walking into happened before receiving)
James had walked into the bank and then received the message... wrong. (redundacy: "and then" implies the sequence - past perfect not required)
James walked into the bank when he received the message... doubtful (meaning changed: Walking into and receiving happened exactly simultaneouly. Preferable would be "was walking into" - past continuous depicts a background event when another event happened.)

Hi
cheque had finally been cleared. Can you please explain why is past perfect used here?
User avatar
akshayk
Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Last visit: 21 Sep 2020
Posts: 273
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Posts: 273
Kudos: 414
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sarathgopinath
sayantanc2k
Narasimham22
I feel this scenario has two possibilities:

1) James walked into the bank and received the message at the same time
2) James walked into the bank and then received the message.

The answer choice can vary depending on the possibility.

Does the adverb 'JUST' play a crucial role in understanding the context?

In this case the past perfect "had walked" makes the use of "when" necessary.

James walked into the bank and then received the message... correct (Walking into happened before receiving)
James had walked into the bank when he received the message... correct. (Walking into happened before receiving)
James had walked into the bank and then received the message... wrong. (redundacy: "and then" implies the sequence - past perfect not required)
James walked into the bank when he received the message... doubtful (meaning changed: Walking into and receiving happened exactly simultaneouly. Preferable would be "was walking into" - past continuous depicts a background event when another event happened.)

Hi
cheque had finally been cleared. Can you please explain why is past perfect used here?

I'm not an expert but if you look at the timeline of events in this sentence, it will make sense.

James had walked into the bank ---- He's already in the bank
He received a message ----- He received the message after he walked into the bank.
His cheque had been cleared ---- This basically means, the cheque was cleared before he received the message.

And that's why we've used Past Perfect here. Past Perfect is basically used for 2 past events in which one event had been completed before the other event took place.
For e.g.
The car had broken down before the mechanic fixed it.
Or James had been hungry before he ate a sandwich.

Hope this helps.
User avatar
mohshu
Joined: 21 Mar 2016
Last visit: 26 Dec 2019
Posts: 416
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 103
Products:
Posts: 416
Kudos: 136
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sarathgopinath
sayantanc2k
Narasimham22
I feel this scenario has two possibilities:

1) James walked into the bank and received the message at the same time
2) James walked into the bank and then received the message.

The answer choice can vary depending on the possibility.

Does the adverb 'JUST' play a crucial role in understanding the context?

In this case the past perfect "had walked" makes the use of "when" necessary.

James walked into the bank and then received the message... correct (Walking into happened before receiving)
James had walked into the bank when he received the message... correct. (Walking into happened before receiving)
James had walked into the bank and then received the message... wrong. (redundacy: "and then" implies the sequence - past perfect not required)
James walked into the bank when he received the message... doubtful (meaning changed: Walking into and receiving happened exactly simultaneouly. Preferable would be "was walking into" - past continuous depicts a background event when another event happened.)

Hi
cheque had finally been cleared. Can you please explain why is past perfect used here?

sarathgopinath cleared happens before walked,,,just to indicate the sequence...
hope that helps
User avatar
sarathgopinath
Joined: 22 Aug 2016
Last visit: 04 Feb 2025
Posts: 68
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 77
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE:Other (Education)
Products:
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
Posts: 68
Kudos: 102
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1) James walked into the bank and received the message at the same time
2) James walked into the bank and then received the message.

The answer choice can vary depending on the possibility.

Does the adverb 'JUST' play a crucial role in understanding the context?[/quote]

In this case the past perfect "had walked" makes the use of "when" necessary.

James walked into the bank and then received the message... correct (Walking into happened before receiving)
James had walked into the bank when he received the message... correct. (Walking into happened before receiving)
James had walked into the bank and then received the message... wrong. (redundacy: "and then" implies the sequence - past perfect not required)
James walked into the bank when he received the message... doubtful (meaning changed: Walking into and receiving happened exactly simultaneouly. Preferable would be "was walking into" - past continuous depicts a background event when another event happened.)[/quote]

Hi
cheque had finally been cleared. Can you please explain why is past perfect used here?[/quote]

I'm not an expert but if you look at the timeline of events in this sentence, it will make sense.

James had walked into the bank ---- He's already in the bank
He received a message ----- He received the message after he walked into the bank.
His cheque had been cleared ---- This basically means, the cheque was cleared before he received the message.

And that's why we've used Past Perfect here. Past Perfect is basically used for 2 past events in which one event had been completed before the other event took place.
For e.g.
The car had broken down before the mechanic fixed it.
Or James had been hungry before he ate a sandwich.

Hope this helps.[/quote]


Thank you so much for the help people. I was clear about the usage of had for sequencing of events.
The part where I am confused is right now the statement has 2 past perfect usages.
'James had walked' & 'cheque had been cleared'. Doesn't that create a confusion of time sequencing? Or are the 2 events unrelated?
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,833
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,833
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts