It is currently 13 Dec 2017, 05:16

Decision(s) Day!:

CHAT Rooms | Ross R1 | Kellogg R1 | Darden R1 | Tepper R1


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

QOTD: As a result of a recent surge of foreclosures,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Expert Post
MBA Section Director
User avatar
D
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4734

Kudos [?]: 18055 [0], given: 1990

Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
QOTD: As a result of a recent surge of foreclosures, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Sep 2017, 14:27
Expert's post
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  85% (hard)

Question Stats:

52% (01:25) correct 48% (01:23) wrong based on 422 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Verbal Question of The Day: Day 96: Critical Reasoning


Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day: E-mail | RSS
For All QOTD Questions Click Here


Community spokesperson: As a result of a recent surge of foreclosures, many homes in our town are vacant and falling into disrepair. Property values have already plummeted and, unless preventative action is taken, will likely continue to plummet as panicked residents, fearing a further decline in the value of their homes, begin to leave town. To prevent this snowball effect, the town should encourage potential buyers to purchase the vacant homes by offering special mortgages with low interest rates for the first five years.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest indication that the plan recommended by the community spokesperson is not likely to achieve its goal?

(A) Many of the town's residents have lived in the area for over 20 years and will not want to leave their homes, despite falling property values.
(B) There are several other ways to prevent panicked residents from leaving town besides offering special mortgages.
(C) Crime rates have risen significantly since the recent surge of foreclosures, making the town a less desirable place to live.
(D) Low interest rates will likely attract some buyers who would be unable to make their mortgage payments once the interest rate goes up after the first five years.
(E) In order to subsidize the special mortgages offered by lenders as part of the plan, the town would have to cut funding for many community programs.

Every question of the day will be followed by an expert reply by GMATNinja in 12-15 hours. Stay tuned! Post your answers and explanations to earn kudos.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

My GMAT Resources
V30-V40: How to do it! | GMATPrep SC | GMATPrep CR | GMATPrep RC | Critical Reasoning Megathread | CR: Numbers and Statistics | CR: Weaken | CR: Strengthen | CR: Assumption | SC: Modifier | SC: Meaning | SC: SV Agreement | RC: Primary Purpose | PS/DS: Numbers and Inequalities | PS/DS: Combinatorics and Coordinates

My MBA Resources
Everything about the MBA Application | Over-Represented MBA woes | Fit Vs Rankings | Low GPA: What you can do | Letter of Recommendation: The Guide | Indian B Schools accepting GMAT score | Why MBA?

My Reviews
Veritas Prep Live Online

Kudos [?]: 18055 [0], given: 1990

Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 07 Feb 2017
Posts: 46

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 317

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: QOTD: As a result of a recent surge of foreclosures, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Sep 2017, 18:06
IMO D

topic at hand :- Can it prevent snowball effect by encouraging potential buyers to purchase the vacant homes by offering special mortgages with low interest rates for the first five years ?

option D tells Government will only be able to attract buyers who won't be able to make payments after 5 years when interest rate are higher, hence snowball effect continues.

Any constructive criticism is always appreciated :)
_________________

I'm just a hiker who is trying to conquer "GMAT Everest" and asking stupid questions!!!

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 317

2 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Posts: 48

Kudos [?]: 8 [2], given: 35

Location: India
GMAT 1: 510 Q46 V17
WE: Web Development (Energy and Utilities)
Re: QOTD: As a result of a recent surge of foreclosures, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Sep 2017, 21:09
2
This post received
KUDOS
MadaraU wrote:
IMO D

topic at hand :- Can it prevent snowball effect by encouraging potential buyers to purchase the vacant homes by offering special mortgages with low interest rates for the first five years ?

option D tells Government will only be able to attract buyers who won't be able to make payments after 5 years when interest rate are higher, hence snowball effect continues.

Any constructive criticism is always appreciated :)


Why cannot C is the answer?

In C, If crimes rates are increased, people will leave the city, no matter what mortgages are. Then snowball effect will continue.

In D, Government will able to attract buyers. So snowball effect will stopped now. we don't want to know whether snowball effect continue after 5 years or not.
_________________

-Yuvaraj
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Stop searching someone to motivate you.

Kudos [?]: 8 [2], given: 35

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 06 Jul 2010
Posts: 31

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 33

GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: QOTD: As a result of a recent surge of foreclosures, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Sep 2017, 21:17
Interesting question as the answer choices are re-worded (See: https://gmatclub.com/forum/community-sp ... 53584.html).

IMO C.

D refers to only "some buyers", which is not strong enough to weaken the argument.
C emphasizes the word "significantly" when introducing new information about crime rates. This indicates that the proposed action is not comprehensive and might fail as the adverse living condition (Crime rate) is still there.

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 33

Director
Director
avatar
P
Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Posts: 622

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 46

Re: QOTD: As a result of a recent surge of foreclosures, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Sep 2017, 21:31
souvik101990 wrote:
Community spokesperson: As a result of a recent surge of foreclosures, many homes in our town are vacant and falling into disrepair. Property values have already plummeted and, unless preventative action is taken, will likely continue to plummet as panicked residents, fearing a further decline in the value of their homes, begin to leave town. To prevent this snowball effect, the town should encourage potential buyers to purchase the vacant homes by offering special mortgages with low interest rates for the first five years.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest indication that the plan recommended by the community spokesperson is not likely to achieve its goal?

(A) Many of the town's residents have lived in the area for over 20 years and will not want to leave their homes, despite falling property values.
(B) There are several other ways to prevent panicked residents from leaving town besides offering special mortgages.
(C) Crime rates have risen significantly since the recent surge of foreclosures, making the town a less desirable place to live.
(D) Low interest rates will likely attract some buyers who would be unable to make their mortgage payments once the interest rate goes up after the first five years.
(E) In order to subsidize the special mortgages offered by lenders as part of the plan, the town would have to cut funding for many community programs.


Will go with C --It gives a alternate reason that can contribute to snow ball effect.
D-- Some buyers will not able --it also gives a reason but inferior to option C ..
C is stronger than D

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 46

2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Status: Searching for something I've been searching..LOL
Joined: 14 Dec 2016
Posts: 64

Kudos [?]: 25 [2], given: 158

Location: India
Concentration: Healthcare, Operations
Schools: Ross '20
GMAT 1: 590 Q35 V42
GPA: 3.5
WE: Medicine and Health (Health Care)
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: QOTD: As a result of a recent surge of foreclosures, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Sep 2017, 21:41
2
This post received
KUDOS
souvik101990 wrote:
Community spokesperson: As a result of a recent surge of foreclosures, many homes in our town are vacant and falling into disrepair. Property values have already plummeted and, unless preventative action is taken, will likely continue to plummet as panicked residents, fearing a further decline in the value of their homes, begin to leave town. To prevent this snowball effect, the town should encourage potential buyers to purchase the vacant homes by offering special mortgages with low interest rates for the first five years.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest indication that the plan recommended by the community spokesperson is not likely to achieve its goal?

(A) Many of the town's residents have lived in the area for over 20 years and will not want to leave their homes, despite falling property values.
(B) There are several other ways to prevent panicked residents from leaving town besides offering special mortgages.
(C) Crime rates have risen significantly since the recent surge of foreclosures, making the town a less desirable place to live.
(D) Low interest rates will likely attract some buyers who would be unable to make their mortgage payments once the interest rate goes up after the first five years.
(E) In order to subsidize the special mortgages offered by lenders as part of the plan, the town would have to cut funding for many community programs.



Conclusion :- Foreclosures------> Vacant homes-----> homes becoming dilapidated------>Fall in price -----> exodus of people and then again back to more foreclosures.

Solution suggested :- Low interest rate mortgages for first 5 years to encourage potential buyers

Any option that negates the effect of the solution is the one which will stand as a wall between the plan and its success.

C--> speaks of increasing crime rates and that the place is becoming less desirable as a place to live. However it does not show us why the plan of offering low mortgage rates will fail. A place becoming less desirable doesn't mean everyone will leave the city.

D--> This option however attacks the core of the assumption of the spokesperson..viz..Low interest rates for first five years. A low interest rate might spur the demand for homes in the short term. however in the long term when the interest rates will rise again, what if the same buyer is not able to pay the increased costs??

hence option D is the only one which serves to weaken the assumption in the plans of the spokesperson.


A kudos doesn't cost anything, though it does show the user some appreciation

Kudos [?]: 25 [2], given: 158

1 KUDOS received
VP
VP
User avatar
G
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1088

Kudos [?]: 89 [1], given: 565

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: 314 Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)
CAT Tests
Re: QOTD: As a result of a recent surge of foreclosures, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Sep 2017, 23:57
1
This post received
KUDOS
The answer is C
A,B and E are out of scope .
D actually supports the program
We are given information that some people will not be able to pay mortgage after 5 years but most of the residents will pay .so drop it .
C on the other hand will cause potential customers to be wary of the crime and therefore they will not buy homes even if the mortgage payments are made lucrative by reducing interest.
C wins

Sent from my ONE E1003 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
_________________

We are more often frightened than hurt; and we suffer more from imagination than from reality

Kudos [?]: 89 [1], given: 565

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Jul 2015
Posts: 21

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Re: QOTD: As a result of a recent surge of foreclosures, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Sep 2017, 00:41
Ans d -

Talks about when the plan will no longer be useful

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 13 Jul 2017
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Re: QOTD: As a result of a recent surge of foreclosures, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Sep 2017, 00:55
I would say option C ; if true would not help in achieving the goal.

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
G
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1223

Kudos [?]: 2033 [1], given: 462

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: 340 Q170 V170
QOTD: As a result of a recent surge of foreclosures, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Sep 2017, 04:54
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The passage describes the following "snowball effect":

  • Many homes are vacant and falling into disrepair.
  • We can infer that this has caused property values in the town to plummet.
  • Fearing a further decline in the value of their homes, panicked residents will begin to leave town.
  • If residents leave town, there will be an even greater number of vacant homes, which will presumably cause property values to continue to fall.
  • If property values continue to fall, more residents will presumably panic and leave their homes.

The community spokesperson has a plan: she recommends that, in order to prevent this snowball effect, "the town should encourage potential buyers to purchase the vacant homes by offering special mortgages with low interest rates for the first five years." And the question is asking us to find the answer choice that most strongly indicates that this plan is unlikely to achieve its goals.

Quote:
(A) Many of the town's residents have lived in the area for over 20 years and will not want to leave their homes, despite falling property values.

The purpose of the plan is to prevent the snowball effect. Choice (A) is a reason why residents would NOT leave, which would lessen the snowball effect. If anything, this might contribute to the success of the recommended plan. Choice (A) certainly does not suggest that the plan will fail, so eliminate (A).

Quote:
(B) There are several other ways to prevent panicked residents from leaving town besides offering special mortgages.

The spokesperson does not say that implementing the recommended plan is the ONLY way to prevent panicked residents from leaving town. The spokesperson simply suggests that this is ONE way to prevent the snowball effect. Eliminate (B).

Quote:
(C) Crime rates have risen significantly since the recent surge of foreclosures, making the town a less desirable place to live.

If crime rates have risen and the town is a less desirable place to live, potential buyers might be discouraged from buying homes in the town, even if special mortgages are offered. Choice (C) is detrimental to the spokesperson's plan, so let's hang on to this one.

Quote:
(D) Low interest rates will likely attract some buyers who would be unable to make their mortgage payments once the interest rate goes up after the first five years.

Notice that choice (D) says "SOME buyers". Sure, some buyers might leave after five years, but as long as the town can encourage people to fill the vacant homes, the snowball effect will be prevented and the plan will succeed. If MOST buyers were to leave after five years, the town could run into the same problem, but if only SOME buyers leave, there is no reason to expect that to happen. Eliminate (D).

Quote:
(E) In order to subsidize the special mortgages offered by lenders as part of the plan, the town would have to cut funding for many community programs.

The argument does not discuss how the special mortgages would be funded. Cutting the funding for many community programs might be a negative consequence of implementing the plan, but this does not suggest that the plan will fail. Eliminate choice (E).

Choice (C) is the best answer.
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor at www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Friendly warning: I'm bad at PMs

GMAT Ninja Wednesdays LIVE on YouTube
Join us, and ask your questions in advance!

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply?
Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99... in any section order

YouTube verbal webinars:
"Next-level" GMAT pronouns | Uses of "that" on the GMAT | Parallelism and meaning | Simplifying GMAT verb tenses | Comparisons, part I |
November webinar schedule

Kudos [?]: 2033 [1], given: 462

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 27 Oct 2016
Posts: 17

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 185

Re: QOTD: As a result of a recent surge of foreclosures, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Sep 2017, 21:50
IMO D

Option C talks about crime rates which will cause people to leave town , but once crime rates are under control people will prefer to stay in town again and all vacant homes will be purchased.

Government is offering lower interest rates so that people will purchase vacant homes

Option D says if interest rates goes high after first five years , people will not be able to pay remaining amount. so proposed plan will not work

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 185

VP
VP
avatar
P
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Posts: 1291

Kudos [?]: 302 [0], given: 166

Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: QOTD: As a result of a recent surge of foreclosures, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Sep 2017, 02:52
GMATNinja wrote:

Quote:
(E) In order to subsidize the special mortgages offered by lenders as part of the plan, the town would have to cut funding for many community programs.

The argument does not discuss how the special mortgages would be funded. Cutting the funding for many community programs might be a negative consequence of implementing the plan, but this does not suggest that the plan will fail. Eliminate choice (E).

Choice (C) is the best answer.


Dear GMATNinja

I have interpretation for choice E. If the town will cut funding for many problems, this will affect the community service and hence make less desirable. Why people should buy home in a town that is poor in service? While the town will subsidize the price, it will lower quality of life.

Where did I go wrong?

Thanks

Kudos [?]: 302 [0], given: 166

Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Status: Don't watch the clock,Do what it does, Keep Going.
Joined: 10 Jan 2017
Posts: 47

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 56

Re: QOTD: As a result of a recent surge of foreclosures, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Sep 2017, 08:46
Community spokesperson: As a result of a recent surge of foreclosures, many homes in our town are vacant and falling into disrepair. Property values have already plummeted and, unless preventative action is taken, will likely continue to plummet as panicked residents, fearing a further decline in the value of their homes, begin to leave town. To prevent this snowball effect, the town should encourage potential buyers to purchase the vacant homes by offering special mortgages with low interest rates for the first five years.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest indication that the plan recommended by the community spokesperson is not likely to achieve its goal?

(A) Many of the town's residents have lived in the area for over 20 years and will not want to leave their homes, despite falling property values.
(B) There are several other ways to prevent panicked residents from leaving town besides offering special mortgages.
(C) Crime rates have risen significantly since the recent surge of foreclosures, making the town a less desirable place to live.
(D) Low interest rates will likely attract some buyers who would be unable to make their mortgage payments once the interest rate goes up after the first five years.
(E) In order to subsidize the special mortgages offered by lenders as part of the plan, the town would have to cut funding for many community programs.
answer- c is the correct answer though d is also a strong contender but d is weaker as comapred to a because it is mentioned some buyers who would be unable to make their mortgage payments once the interest rate goes up after the first five years.

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 56

Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 1790

Kudos [?]: 1062 [0], given: 90

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: QOTD: As a result of a recent surge of foreclosures, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Sep 2017, 20:16
Community spokesperson: As a result of a recent surge of foreclosures, many homes in our town are vacant and falling into disrepair. Property values have already plummeted and, unless preventative action is taken, will likely continue to plummet as panicked residents, fearing a further decline in the value of their homes, begin to leave town. To prevent this snowball effect, the town should encourage potential buyers to purchase the vacant homes by offering special mortgages with low interest rates for the first five years.

Boil it down - To prevent property prices from falling further , town should encourage potential buyers to purchase the vacant homes by offering special mortgages with low interest rates for the first five years.

Type - weaken

(A) Many of the town's residents have lived in the area for over 20 years and will not want to leave their homes, despite falling property values. - Irrelevant - we are not concerned about those residents
(B) There are several other ways to prevent panicked residents from leaving town besides offering special mortgages. - Incorrect - just because there are other ways , it does not make this way a bad one
(C) Crime rates have risen significantly since the recent surge of foreclosures, making the town a less desirable place to live. - Correct
(D) Low interest rates will likely attract some buyers who would be unable to make their mortgage payments once the interest rate goes up after the first five years. - ISWAT - some might be very few people and that too might fail in repaying loans after 5 years
(E) In order to subsidize the special mortgages offered by lenders as part of the plan, the town would have to cut funding for many community programs. Incorrect - it just tells how the town plans to fund and does not weaken the plan

Answer C
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Kudos [?]: 1062 [0], given: 90

Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 690

Kudos [?]: 166 [0], given: 138

Re: QOTD: As a result of a recent surge of foreclosures, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Sep 2017, 06:45
Community spokesperson: As a result of a recent surge of foreclosures, many homes in our town are vacant and falling into disrepair. Property values have already plummeted and, unless preventative action is taken, will likely continue to plummet as panicked residents, fearing a further decline in the value of their homes, begin to leave town. To prevent this snowball effect, the town should encourage potential buyers to purchase the vacant homes by offering special mortgages with low interest rates for the first five years.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest indication that the plan recommended by the community spokesperson is not likely to achieve its goal?

(A) Many of the town's residents have lived in the area for over 20 years and will not want to leave their homes, despite falling property values. -This is the opposite of the premise. The residents will leave irrespective of the # of years they have spent in their homes.
(B) There are several other ways to prevent panicked residents from leaving town besides offering special mortgages. -This is a fact set.
(C) Crime rates have risen significantly since the recent surge of foreclosures, making the town a less desirable place to live. -Correct. If the town becomes unsafe, no plan will work.
(D) Low interest rates will likely attract some buyers who would be unable to make their mortgage payments once the interest rate goes up after the first five years. -The banks should take care of such people who won't be able to pay post the increment in the interest rate. Also, there will always be some people who will not be able to repay the loan properly.
(E) In order to subsidize the special mortgages offered by lenders as part of the plan, the town would have to cut funding for many community programs. -Out of scope
_________________

Kudos if my post helps!

Helpful links:
1. e-GMAT's ALL SC Compilation
2. LSAT RC compilation
3. Actual LSAT CR collection by Broal
4. QOTD RC (Carcass)
5. Challange OG RC

Kudos [?]: 166 [0], given: 138

1 KUDOS received
VP
VP
avatar
P
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Posts: 1291

Kudos [?]: 302 [1], given: 166

Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: QOTD: As a result of a recent surge of foreclosures, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Sep 2017, 01:08
1
This post received
KUDOS
I have interpretation for choice E. If the town will cut funding for many problems, this will affect the community service and hence make less desirable. Why people should buy home in a town that is poor in service? While the town will subsidize the price, it will lower quality of life.

Where did I go wrong?

Thanks

Kudos [?]: 302 [1], given: 166

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
G
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1223

Kudos [?]: 2033 [1], given: 462

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: 340 Q170 V170
Re: QOTD: As a result of a recent surge of foreclosures, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Sep 2017, 07:45
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
Mo2men wrote:
I have interpretation for choice E. If the town will cut funding for many problems, this will affect the community service and hence make less desirable. Why people should buy home in a town that is poor in service? While the town will subsidize the price, it will lower quality of life.

Where did I go wrong?

Thanks

This is a good point. Cutting funding for many community programs could also lower the quality of life. But remember that we are looking for an answer choice that provides the strongest indication that the plan is not likely to achieve its goal. Also, we do not know how much the funding for such programs would have to be cut. Perhaps the programs will not be significantly affected by the funding cuts.

So, which sounds like a stronger reason to leave town: a significant rise in crime rates or an unspecified decrease in funding for community programs? Although the latter might contribute to the problem, choice (C) is a better answer.

Great question!
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor at www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Friendly warning: I'm bad at PMs

GMAT Ninja Wednesdays LIVE on YouTube
Join us, and ask your questions in advance!

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply?
Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99... in any section order

YouTube verbal webinars:
"Next-level" GMAT pronouns | Uses of "that" on the GMAT | Parallelism and meaning | Simplifying GMAT verb tenses | Comparisons, part I |
November webinar schedule

Kudos [?]: 2033 [1], given: 462

VP
VP
avatar
P
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Posts: 1291

Kudos [?]: 302 [0], given: 166

Reviews Badge CAT Tests
QOTD: As a result of a recent surge of foreclosures, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Sep 2017, 07:55
GMATNinja wrote:
Mo2men wrote:
I have interpretation for choice E. If the town will cut funding for many problems, this will affect the community service and hence make less desirable. Why people should buy home in a town that is poor in service? While the town will subsidize the price, it will lower quality of life.

Where did I go wrong?

Thanks

This is a good point. Cutting funding for many community programs could also lower the quality of life. But remember that we are looking for an answer choice that provides the strongest indication that the plan is not likely to achieve its goal. Also, we do not know how much the funding for such programs would have to be cut. Perhaps the programs will not be significantly affected by the funding cuts.

So, which sounds like a stronger reason to leave town: a significant rise in crime rates or an unspecified decrease in funding for community programs? Although the latter might contribute to the problem, choice (C) is a better answer.

Great question!


Thanks GMATNinja

After taking a closer look of the 2 options based on your view, I totally agree with you. SIGNIFICANT crime will be more inferior.

Thanks for the kudos :-)

Kudos [?]: 302 [0], given: 166

QOTD: As a result of a recent surge of foreclosures,   [#permalink] 26 Sep 2017, 07:55
Display posts from previous: Sort by

QOTD: As a result of a recent surge of foreclosures,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.