Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 18:56 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 18:56
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2 
Sub 505 Level|   Idioms/Diction/Redundancy|   Parallelism|                        
User avatar
Elite097
User avatar
Joined: 20 Apr 2022
Last visit: 08 Oct 2025
Posts: 771
Own Kudos:
553
Given Kudos: 346
Location: India
Schools: Sloan '25 Columbia '27 Haas '27
GPA: 3.64
Schools: Sloan '25 Columbia '27 Haas '27
Posts: 771
Kudos: 553
Recently discovered fossil remains strongly suggest that the Australia 05 Jul 2023, 21:39
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB EducationAisle why cant mammals be a development ? Why do we necessarily need 'type'?
User avatar
EducationAisle
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
Recently discovered fossil remains strongly suggest that the Australia 06 Jul 2023, 23:40
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Elite097
why cant mammals be a development ? Why do we necessarily need 'type'?
Show more
Perhaps one way to look at this would be that the sentence is talking about “Australian egg-laying mammals”, which is obviously as specific type of mammal.
User avatar
Elite097
User avatar
Joined: 20 Apr 2022
Last visit: 08 Oct 2025
Posts: 771
Own Kudos:
553
Given Kudos: 346
Location: India
Schools: Sloan '25 Columbia '27 Haas '27
GPA: 3.64
Schools: Sloan '25 Columbia '27 Haas '27
Posts: 771
Kudos: 553
Recently discovered fossil remains strongly suggest that the Australia 12 Dec 2023, 04:51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EducationAisle
Elite097
why cant mammals be a development ? Why do we necessarily need 'type'?
Perhaps one way to look at this would be that the sentence is talking about “Australian egg-laying mammals”, which is obviously as specific type of mammal.
Show more

EducationAisle what would be an example of a development in this context?
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,563
 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
 [1]
Recently discovered fossil remains strongly suggest that the Australia 31 Dec 2023, 17:24
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Elite097

A development is usually an an event (something that happened), so it would be odd to refer to animals as a development. However, even if we allowed this, E would fail on meaning grounds. The idea here is that egg-laying mammals did not develop independently from other mammals. They are part of the main developmental stream. E is talking about the egg-laying mammals evolving "independent of" their own ancestors. That doesn't have any sensible meaning, and it doesn't fit what the other choices are trying to say.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
miag
188 posts