GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 19 Sep 2018, 17:42

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Recently discovered fossil remains strongly suggest that the Australia

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Nov 2013
Posts: 116
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Recently discovered fossil remains strongly suggest that the Australia  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Nov 2016, 17:53
This one was tricky. The difficulty I had from the get go was choosing instead. I thought instead was the way to go. Then I read that the GMAT prefers rather for contrast and comparisons.

Split1) Parallelism. "x rather than y" or "x instead of y". Both are correct words for contrast. The other thing to add here is that what follows x and what follows y must be in parallel. "are a branch of the main… rather than a type…" in B does it. A, C, D, and E are out.

Split2) Verb vs Noun. Whenever you see both types of words, the GMAT will always prefer verb action. In this case: "Developing" = verb form is better then "Development" = noun form. C and E are questionable, potentially out.
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 531
Premium Member
Re: Recently discovered fossil remains strongly suggest that the Australia  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Mar 2017, 20:12
Merged topics. Please, search for the questions before posting them.
_________________

Please Read: Verbal Posting Rules

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 04 Oct 2015
Posts: 316
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V36
GPA: 3.56
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Recently discovered fossil remains strongly suggest that the Australia  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 May 2017, 23:00
Recently discovered fossil remains strongly suggest that the Australian egg-laying mammals of today are a branch of the main stem of mammalian evolution rather than developing independently from a common ancestor of mammals more than 220 million years ago.

(A) rather than developing independently from

(B) rather than a type that developed independently from

(C) rather than a type whose development was independent of

(D) instead of developing independently from

(E) instead of a development that was independent of
_________________

Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one - Bruce Lee

Study Buddy Forum Moderator
User avatar
D
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 1196
Location: India
WE: Engineering (Other)
Premium Member CAT Tests
Recently discovered fossil remains strongly suggest that the Australia  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jul 2017, 22:18
Hi Experts GMATNinja mikemcgarry
Is the usage of both idiom instead of and rather than correct in this OG?
_________________

It's the journey that brings us happiness not the destination.

Mannheim Thread Master
User avatar
S
Status: It's now or never
Joined: 10 Feb 2017
Posts: 236
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q40 V39
GPA: 3
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Recently discovered fossil remains strongly suggest that the Australia  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Aug 2017, 08:09
Correct answer is B - The confusion between two options B and D, where D cited clearly "Developing independently from is not parallel to a branch."
_________________

2017-2018 MBA Deadlines

Threadmaster for B-school Discussions
Class of 2019: Mannheim Business School
Class 0f 2020: HHL Leipzig

Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 28 Sep 2017
Posts: 84
Location: India
Concentration: General Management
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.92
Premium Member
Re: Recently discovered fossil remains strongly suggest that the Australia  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Sep 2017, 18:45
can someone please suggest if the usage of 'whose' in option C is correct or incorrect?
I am able to eliminate all other incorrect options but stuck at C.
Plus on a broader level when is the usage of 'whose' appropriate?
Thanks.
_________________

The thing about privilege is.. you often don't recognize your own !!!

Manhattan Prep Instructor
User avatar
S
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 1302
Re: Recently discovered fossil remains strongly suggest that the Australia  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Sep 2017, 22:13
1
cubs In this case, "whose" appears as the possessive form of "which." Basically, "which's" is not a word, so we say "whose." The main problem with C is "developments was." There shouldn't be more than one development, and if that were correct, then we'd need to say "developments were."
_________________


Dmitry Farber | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | New York


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 10 May 2018
Posts: 130
Concentration: Finance, Sustainability
CAT Tests
Re: Recently discovered fossil remains strongly suggest that the Australia  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jul 2018, 23:08
Couldn't agree more! On applying Parallelism rules one can neglect Options A, D.
egoistwlv wrote:
empty_spaces wrote:
Recently discovered fossil remains strongly suggest that the Australian egg-laying mammals of today are a branch of the main stem of mammalian evolution rather than developing independently from a common ancestor of mammals more than 220 million years ago.

(A) rather than developing independently from
(B) rather than a type that developed independently from
(C) rather than a type whose development was independent of
(D) instead of developing independently from
(E) instead of a development that was independent of


parallel structure. A and D are out

From the old point of view (which is objected by the author):
egg-laying is independently evolved, but it's still from a common ancestor of mammals.
if we use the phrase 'independent of', the clause means that egg-laying mammal is not from a common ancestor of mammals. So the meaning is changed

_________________

Stuck in the 600-700 score bracket? I welcome you to read my four-step course of action to a modest score.
I also invite you to critique and help me find flaws in my modus operandi. Thanks!

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 09 Aug 2017
Posts: 194
Re: Recently discovered fossil remains strongly suggest that the Australia  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Aug 2018, 04:46
Hello Ma'm.

I agree with logic given here, but I have one question here?
Do GMAC give such question in GMAT in which I have to overrule the grammar?

egmat wrote:
Hi All,

Recently discovered fossil remains strongly suggest that the Australian egg-laying mammals of today are a branch of the main stem of mammalian evolution rather than developing independently from a common ancestor of mammals more than 220 million years ago.

Meaning Analysis:

The sentence is talking about the Australian egg-laying mammals of today. They are a branch of the main stem of mammalian evolution. They did not develop independently from a common ancestor of mammals.

Error Analysis:

The sentence is presenting a comparison. It says that Australian egg-laying mammals are X rather than Y.

X = a branch of the main stem of mammalian evolution (a noun phrase)
Y = developing independently from a common ancestor of mammals (a noun phrase that actually starts from an action word – a gerund)

Hence, the entities compared are not parallel. Y also needs to be a noun phrase that starts with a “proper” noun entity.

PoE:

A. rather than developing independently from: Incorrect for the reason stated above.

B. rather than a type that developed independently from: Correct. “a type…” is parallel to “a branch…”

C. rather than a type whose developments was independent of: Incorrect. Plural subject “developments” does not agree in number with singular “was”.

D. instead of developing independently from: Incorrect. Same parallelism error as in choice A.

E. instead of a development that was independent of: Incorrect. Again, the entities compared are logically not parallel.

So you see, the knowledge of correct usage or “rather than” and “instead of” is not imperative to solve this problem.

Hope this helps. :)
Thanks.
Shraddha
Re: Recently discovered fossil remains strongly suggest that the Australia &nbs [#permalink] 15 Aug 2018, 04:46

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 30 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Recently discovered fossil remains strongly suggest that the Australia

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.