CEdward
Frustrating. Question 5 had two contenders. The word "support" in B) threw me off. The author of the passage clearly in paragraph 3 makes a contention against F and O's work. So I don't see why he/she would quote them to 'show support'. Does anyone else feel mislead here?
5. The author of the passage quotes Fugita and O’Brien (Text In Blue) most probably in order to
(A) point out a weakness in their hypothesis about the strength of community ties among Japanese Americans
(B) show how they support their claim about the notability of community cohesion for Japanese Americans
(C) indicate how they demonstrate the high degree of adaptation of Japanese Americans to United States culture
(D) suggest that they have inaccurately compared Japanese Americans to other ethnic groups in the United States
(E) emphasize their contention that the Japanese American sense of peoplehood extended beyond local and family ties
Actually, the important part of the passage ( to get this question correct) is right after the blue text.
This comparative difference is important to Fugita and O’Brien, and they hypothesize that the Japanese American community persisted in the face of assimilation because of a particularly strong preexisting sense of “peoplehood”. They argue that this sense of peoplehood extended beyond local and family ties. They argue that this sense of peoplehood extended beyond local and family ties.Notice the use of the words
important ,
hypothesize, and
argue in the above sentences.
This sentence clearly tells us why author quotes Fugita and O’Brien.
Option B is, therefore, correct.