Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 02:06 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 02:06
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sneha2021
Joined: 20 Dec 2020
Last visit: 10 Jun 2025
Posts: 315
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 522
Location: India
Posts: 315
Kudos: 38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,195
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,195
Kudos: 4,762
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,781
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,781
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
AcceleratorCC
Joined: 19 Mar 2022
Last visit: 13 Sep 2022
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Posts: 10
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
CAN "rule that" take command subjunctive?
User avatar
Sneha2021
Joined: 20 Dec 2020
Last visit: 10 Jun 2025
Posts: 315
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 522
Location: India
Posts: 315
Kudos: 38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB GMATNinja

(E) The court ruled the Masters Dog Training Club not eligible to be exempted from taxes as an educational group, rejecting the argument that the primary aim was to teach people to train dogs.

E is incorrect because "rejecting..." presents result or how aspect of "The court ruled..."

Verb-ing modifier does not make sense in this case.

Please let me know if my reasoning is correct to reject E meaning-wise.
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,884
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sneha2021
KarishmaB GMATNinja

(E) The court ruled the Masters Dog Training Club not eligible to be exempted from taxes as an educational group, rejecting the argument that the primary aim was to teach people to train dogs.

E is incorrect because "rejecting..." presents result or how aspect of "The court ruled..."

Verb-ing modifier does not make sense in this case.

Please let me know if my reasoning is correct to reject E meaning-wise.


Hello Sneha2021,

Yes, your analysis of Choice E is correct indeed. Also, the structure "The court ruled the Masters Dog Training Club..." is incorrect. The correct expression is "The court ruled THAT the Masters Dog Training Club...".


Hope this helps. :)
Thanks.
Shraddha
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
76,986
 [1]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,986
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sneha2021
KarishmaB GMATNinja

(E) The court ruled the Masters Dog Training Club not eligible to be exempted from taxes as an educational group, rejecting the argument that the primary aim was to teach people to train dogs.

E is incorrect because "rejecting..." presents result or how aspect of "The court ruled..."

Verb-ing modifier does not make sense in this case.

Please let me know if my reasoning is correct to reject E meaning-wise.

Not really. I would not eliminate option (E) based on the use of comma + verb-ing after the clause.

Try to think of it this way - when we have comma + verb-ing, we are saying "in effect, this happened"
e.g. The principal stepped onto the podium, silencing the students.

This means the principal stepped onto the podium and this action of his, in effect, led to students becoming quiet.

Now apply the same here:
The court ruled that A was ineligible for exemption, rejecting the argument that A's primary aim was to teach.
The court's ruling could have, in effect, led to the rejection of the argument given by A. So I don't really have a problem with that aspect of (E).

There are multiple other problems with option (E).
'that' is missing.
'not eligible to be exempted as an educational group' is at best awkward.
It doesn't specify whose primary aim are we talking about. We need to say the Club's primary aim...
User avatar
Riya1475828
Joined: 06 Oct 2023
Last visit: 05 Dec 2024
Posts: 38
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 63
Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
GPA: 8.6
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
Posts: 38
Kudos: 54
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
@GMATNinja can you pls explain why E is wrong here?
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts