Last visit was: 03 Dec 2024, 11:25 It is currently 03 Dec 2024, 11:25
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
parkhydel
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 28 Oct 2024
Posts: 218
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 54
Posts: 218
Kudos: 13,580
 [111]
12
Kudos
Add Kudos
99
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 21 Nov 2024
Posts: 11,450
Own Kudos:
37,811
 [10]
Given Kudos: 333
Status:Math and DI Expert
Products:
Expert reply
Posts: 11,450
Kudos: 37,811
 [10]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
nazii
Joined: 29 Oct 2021
Last visit: 12 Jan 2024
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
38
 [9]
Given Kudos: 279
Posts: 58
Kudos: 38
 [9]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
SudipM7
Joined: 11 May 2021
Last visit: 05 Jan 2024
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 390
Location: India
WE:Supply Chain Management (Retail: E-commerce)
Posts: 5
Kudos: 3
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Any explanation of this 3rd ques?
User avatar
hamshica96
Joined: 19 Sep 2021
Last visit: 03 Dec 2024
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 19
Location: India
Posts: 1
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can anyone explain Q1? not sure how the calculations arrived at
User avatar
Piscine15
Joined: 18 Sep 2020
Last visit: 03 Dec 2024
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
17
 [2]
Given Kudos: 131
Location: India
Schools: Booth '27
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q89 V86 DI81
Schools: Booth '27
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q89 V86 DI81
Posts: 40
Kudos: 17
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
SudipM7
Any explanation of this 3rd ques?

If their numeral value remained the same from 1990 to 2005, then we can say that maybe their total population not remained the same as species X is A percent of total population.

Hence if total population is increased then surely the A value is decreased accordingly to make the effect constant (i.e. X population in 2005) and vice versa.

.
.
We can also say that all other options are getting rejected easily. A and E are directly out.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Sb1131
Joined: 06 Aug 2023
Last visit: 22 Feb 2024
Posts: 46
Own Kudos:
22
 [1]
Given Kudos: 77
Posts: 46
Kudos: 22
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hamshica96
Can anyone explain Q1? not sure how the calculations arrived at
The difference seems higher from 1975 to 1990 , not sure why OA says otherwise

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
horrorslive
Joined: 28 Aug 2023
Last visit: 03 Dec 2024
Posts: 85
Own Kudos:
15
 [1]
Given Kudos: 72
Posts: 85
Kudos: 15
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can anyone please explain q2 and @Sajjid1994 please provide the official explanation.
User avatar
ishahere
Joined: 31 Oct 2023
Last visit: 09 Jan 2024
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 13
Posts: 8
Kudos: 3
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pls explain Q3
User avatar
steck
Joined: 12 Jan 2024
Last visit: 04 Jun 2024
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
4
 [4]
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q56 V57
GRE 1: Q155 V155
GMAT 1: 780 Q56 V57
GRE 1: Q155 V155
Posts: 5
Kudos: 4
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
To find the total number of mice in a region, we need to divide the given number of "X" by the percentage provided in the second table. Let's calculate the values:

For the year 1960:
Given number of X: 947
Percentage: 3.356%
Total number of mice in 1960 = 947 / 3.356 = 282 (rounded to the nearest whole number)

For the year 1975:
Given number of X: 144
Percentage: 0.351%
Total number of mice in 1975 = 144 / 0.351 = 410 (rounded to the nearest whole number)

For the year 1990:
Given number of X: 968
Percentage: 2.051%
Total number of mice in 1990 = 968 / 2.051 = 472 (rounded to the nearest whole number)

Based on these calculations, we can observe that there is an increase in the total number of mice from 1960 to 1975 (282 to 410). Therefore, the answer to the first part of the question is "Yes."

For the second part of the question, we can see that the total population of the region in 1990 is approximately 478 (as calculated above). Since this is greater than the total number of mice in 1990 (472), the answer is also "Yes."

However, for the third part of the question, if we compare the total number of mice in 1975 (410) to the total number in 1990 (472), we can see that there is an increase in population from 1975 to 1990. Therefore, the answer is "No."
User avatar
nyota.benson
Joined: 31 Jul 2023
Last visit: 26 Jan 2024
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
10
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 12
Kudos: 10
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Q3 :
Despite Species X remaining constant from 1990 to 2005, there were species amongst the total population, Which their population might have kept changing between 1990 to 2005, this could have led to population not remaining constant.
User avatar
mmdfl
Joined: 06 Aug 2022
Last visit: 25 Nov 2024
Posts: 113
Own Kudos:
144
 [1]
Given Kudos: 164
Location: Brazil
Concentration: Technology, Economics
Posts: 113
Kudos: 144
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nyota.benson
Q3 :
Despite Species X remaining constant from 1990 to 2005, there were species amongst the total population, Which their population might have kept changing between 1990 to 2005, this could have led to population not remaining constant.
Isn't this against the main premisse of the question that "they can make fairly accurate estimations about the total regional mouse populations."?
User avatar
cathyjiang04
Joined: 11 Jan 2024
Last visit: 15 Mar 2024
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
5
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 13
Kudos: 5
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
steck
To find the total number of mice in a region, we need to divide the given number of "X" by the percentage provided in the second table. Let's calculate the values:

For the year 1960:
Given number of X: 947
Percentage: 3.356%
Total number of mice in 1960 = 947 / 3.356 = 282 (rounded to the nearest whole number)

For the year 1975:
Given number of X: 144
Percentage: 0.351%
Total number of mice in 1975 = 144 / 0.351 = 410 (rounded to the nearest whole number)

For the year 1990:
Given number of X: 968
Percentage: 2.051%
Total number of mice in 1990 = 968 / 2.051 = 472 (rounded to the nearest whole number)

Based on these calculations, we can observe that there is an increase in the total number of mice from 1960 to 1975 (282 to 410). Therefore, the answer to the first part of the question is "Yes."

For the second part of the question, we can see that the total population of the region in 1990 is approximately 478 (as calculated above). Since this is greater than the total number of mice in 1990 (472), the answer is also "Yes."

However, for the third part of the question, if we compare the total number of mice in 1975 (410) to the total number in 1990 (472), we can see that there is an increase in population from 1975 to 1990. Therefore, the answer is "No."
Shouldn't the Total number of mice in 1960 = 947000 / 0.03356 ?
User avatar
cathyjiang04
Joined: 11 Jan 2024
Last visit: 15 Mar 2024
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
5
 [3]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 13
Kudos: 5
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
plz explain Q2?
User avatar
JayGMATFOCUS
Joined: 29 Sep 2023
Last visit: 22 Nov 2024
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 95
Location: India
GPA: 88%
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MartyMurray
chetan2u
KarishmaB
ScottTargetTestPrep

Could anyone please help understand Q3 and its solution ? Thanks in advance­
User avatar
Kedar91
Joined: 04 May 2021
Last visit: 01 Dec 2024
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 10
Products:
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
please solve for question 2
User avatar
Maxsparrow
Joined: 19 Aug 2023
Last visit: 07 Jun 2024
Posts: 68
Own Kudos:
39
 [1]
Given Kudos: 82
Location: Indonesia
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q85 V83 DI85
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V27
GMAT 2: 640 Q50 V26
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q85 V83 DI85
GMAT 2: 640 Q50 V26
Posts: 68
Kudos: 39
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u
Quote:
 Could anyone please help understand Q3 and its solution ? Thanks in advance­
­Frankly speaking, I was initially lost with the words. 
3. Assume that the Species X population totals of TY remained roughly constant between 1990 and 2005. Which one of the following statements is best supported by the information provided?

Not the best of the wordings one should find in an official question but the solution would lie in the sentence.
Quote:
Researchers studying long-term changes in regional mouse populations have found that by focusing on the populations of a rare but widespread and easily identifiable species of mouse (Species X), they can make fairly accurate estimations about the total regional mouse populations.
Here, the species X population roughly remainded constant from 1960 to 1990, from 947630 to 968460. But this amount reduce to 2.1% from 3.5% of total mouse poulation. 
Thus, constant population of species X means increase in overall mouse population in TY.
Correct option - The total mouse population of TY may not have remained roughly constant between 1990 and 2005.
­What a sophisticated approach. Awesome
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 03 Dec 2024
Posts: 15,524
Own Kudos:
69,986
 [7]
Given Kudos: 449
Location: Pune, India
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 15,524
Kudos: 69,986
 [7]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Responding to a pm:
You don't need any calculations in this question. Just look at the data given and also on what is not given!

Question 3:


Species X pop of TY is constant from 1990 to 2005 so in 2005 also it will be about 970k. In 1990, it is about 2% of total mouse pop. We don't know what percent it will be in 2005 because we are not given that this percentage remains the same too.
When Species X pop was about 950k in 1960, it was 3.3% of total pop. So in 2005, a similar figure could represent any percent of the total mouse pop.

So 2nd statement is supported: The total mouse population of TY may not have remained roughly constant between 1990 and 2005.
Since Species X could be any percent of total pop, the total pop could be any figure. So it may not have remained constant.
ANSWER

Look at the other statements:

TY most likely does not share a border with any other region in the study.

I do not know whether Species X moves from one region to another. The table gives me no indication. In fact, if anything, it shows that when the pop reduces, it reduces or stays steady in most regions. When it increases, it increases or stays steady in most regions. So there is no data to support anything about whether one region shares border with another region.


TY had the largest total mouse population of any region in the study in 2005.

No info about total mouse population in 2005 of any region. As we see, the percentages (Species X as a percent of total mouse pop) change with time so even if for some regions we know species X pop in 2005, we cannot say anything about total pop.

The total mouse population of EW grew more than twice as fast between 1990 and 2005 as the total mouse population of TY did.

As we discussed about, no info about total mouse pop in 2005. ­

TY was the only region in the study in which the Species X population remained relatively steady between 1990 and 2005.

No data to support this. It may have remained steady in IQ or JR or PS etc. ­
User avatar
MT___
Joined: 31 Oct 2023
Last visit: 02 Nov 2024
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 241
Posts: 51
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kindly answer all 3 in depth
User avatar
nsbcak
Joined: 17 Feb 2024
Last visit: 25 May 2024
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 5
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
cathyjiang04
I agree. Why is no one dividing each % by 100?
 1   2   
Moderators:
Math Expert
97508 posts
RC & DI Moderator
11450 posts
DI Forum Moderator
266 posts