Disclaimer: I'm not an expert on PT programs. I'm speaking from my knowledge of applying to both these schools and subsequently interviewing with them.
When I read the first part of your post I was convinced Ross makes more sense for logistic reasons. But later when you mention that you wish to work internationally and that too in Asia region I would say Kellogg is a clear winner here. I'm myself based in Singapore and I did heavy research comparing the brand values of these two schools in Asia region (I wish to move back to Asia in long-term). Kellogg is much stronger compared to Ross.
I really don't know how the PT schedule works. But my suggestion would be to look for jobs in Chicago area close to Kellogg. If in next few weeks/month you get a job or at least get some positive leads then choose Kellogg. If you feel switching your job won't be possible in next 6-12 months then consider your other personal commitments. Can you spare 4-5 hours every week for travel? If yes, choose Kellogg, if No, choose Ross.
On the topic of applying to FT I would say, talk to some PT students in both these schools. If you believe you can achieve your career goals with a PT program, go for PT, else wait for next year and apply FT. Reason is simple, if you wait another year for FT, that means you'll graduate in 2020 with a FT MBA (assuming you get an admit in FT program). If you start PT in 2017, that way too you'll graduate in 2020 with your MBA
. Either way you'll graduate in 2020
Isn't the choice obvious here?
Again, I'm not an expert. My comments are based on my understanding of two schools and some bit of logical thinking.
Does it help?