GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 09 Dec 2019, 05:17

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Sartore is a better movie reviewer than Kelly. A movie review should h

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Dec 2017
Posts: 313
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V28
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V40
Sartore is a better movie reviewer than Kelly. A movie review should h  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2018, 01:07
2
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

63% (01:50) correct 37% (02:02) wrong based on 175 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Sartore is a better movie reviewer than Kelly. A movie review should help readers determine whether or not they are apt to enjoy the movie, and a person who is likely to enjoy a particular movie is much more likely to realize this by reading a review by Sartore than a review by Kelly, even though Sartore is more likely to give a movie an unfavorable review than a favorable one.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

(A) Sartore has technical knowledge of film, whereas Kelly is merely a fan.

(B) Most of Kelly's movie reviews are unfavorable to the movie being reviewed.

(C) One who is apt not to enjoy a particular movie is more likely to realize this by reading a review by Sartore than a review by Kelly.

(D) Reading a movie review by Sartore will usually help one to enjoy the movie more than one otherwise would have.

(E) Most of the movies that Sartore reviews are also reviewed by Kelly.

LSAT 78
Intern
Joined: 06 Feb 2017
Posts: 37
Location: India
Schools: HBS '22, HEC '22
GMAT 1: 570 Q39 V28
GMAT 2: 620 Q49 V26
GPA: 4
Re: Sartore is a better movie reviewer than Kelly. A movie review should h  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2018, 02:05
1
Official answer on Manhatten Prep:
C

(A) Out of scope. The argument doesn't care about technical knowledge; just whether a person can help people know if they'd enjoy a movie. If you equated technical knowledge with an ability to inform people, you made an unwarranted jump.

(B) If anything, this answer tells me that Kelly and Sartore are similar in some way. That doesn't help me determine that Sartore is better.

(C) Bingo. Almost exactly what we predicted. We needed to support Sartore's better skills with an answer comparing the two reviewers and stating that S beats K. This does that for a new group, strengthening our conclusion.

(D) Out of scope. "Good reviews" are defined in the argument as helping people determine whether they would like a film, not altering whether or not they'd enjoy the movie.

(E) Out of scope. The amount of overlap between the movies they review doesn't impact how good they are at reviewing movies. Also, if anything, this draws a similarity between the two, when I'm trying to conclude that they're different.
Manager
Joined: 24 Dec 2017
Posts: 184
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Real Estate
Schools: Johnson '21
Re: Sartore is a better movie reviewer than Kelly. A movie review should h  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2018, 03:11
Sartore is a better movie reviewer than Kelly. A movie review should help readers determine whether or not they are apt to enjoy the movie, and a person who is likely to enjoy a particular movie is much more likely to realize this by reading a review by Sartore than a review by Kelly, even though Sartore is more likely to give a movie an unfavorable review than a favorable one.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

(A) Sartore has technical knowledge of film, whereas Kelly is merely a fan.
Explanation: IRRELEVANT

(B) Most of Kelly's movie reviews are unfavorable to the movie being reviewed.
Explanation: Most are Favourable and rest are unfavourable. How does this option help us to determine whether Sartore is a better reviewer? - IRRELEVANT

(C) One who is apt not to enjoy a particular movie is more likely to realize this by reading a review by Sartore than a review by Kelly.
Explanation: There we go! This option implies that Sartore reviews are legit and people choose this platform to read genuine feedbacks. Hence it indirectly claims that Sartre is better off than Kelly. -CORRECT

(D) Reading a movie review by Sartore will usually help one to enjoy the movie more than one otherwise would have.
Explanation: Sartore only gives legitimate reviews but it doesn't change a person's approach towards a movie just because of the review - INCORRECT

(E) Most of the movies that Sartore reviews are also reviewed by Kelly.
Explanation: So what? - INCORRECT

HENCE I chose C

Thank you
Arjun
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 7222
Re: Sartore is a better movie reviewer than Kelly. A movie review should h  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Nov 2019, 03:33
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Sartore is a better movie reviewer than Kelly. A movie review should h   [#permalink] 25 Nov 2019, 03:33
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Sartore is a better movie reviewer than Kelly. A movie review should h

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne