Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 18:59 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 18:59
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
49,291
 [10]
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,291
 [10]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KaranB1
Joined: 17 Aug 2018
Last visit: 22 Oct 2025
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 153
Location: India
Schools: IIMA WBS '22
GMAT 1: 640 Q46 V32
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V38
Products:
Schools: IIMA WBS '22
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V38
Posts: 121
Kudos: 188
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ajaygaur319
Joined: 05 May 2019
Last visit: 01 Jan 2021
Posts: 126
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 143
Location: India
Posts: 126
Kudos: 654
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
49,291
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,291
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official Explanation

So what’s the flaw? Saunders claims that, since the demolition strategy worked, those who favored it must be right and those who opposed it must be wrong. But he doesn’t consider the idea that the opposing plan might also have worked—maybe it would even have worked better given a chance. He doesn’t even try to show that the demolition plan was the only alternative; he neglects the possibility that the opposing plan, if adopted, might have also solved the safety problem. Saunders supplies no evidence against the opposing plan, as (D) correctly points out, so it’s premature for him to declare the rehab proponents wrong.

(A) We don’t know what kind of scare tactics Saunders and his buddies may have used in the actual meeting, but these aren’t a factor in this argument, which comes after the fact.

(B) has more to do with the opposing side. In order for the rehab folks to fully make their case, they would eventually have to establish that there were eligible people interested in participating in the program. Saunders, however, certainly doesn’t need to furnish this kind of information.

(C) We know that there was some vocal public dissent, and Saunders doesn’t try to pretend that there wasn’t. He makes no claim of “universal public support.”

(E) Everyone agreed that the houses were a safety threat, and the specific nature of the danger isn’t part of the dispute between the demolition supporters and the opposing faction. Saunders need not elaborate on this.

Answer: D
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts