vallabhjadhav
Hi,
In the Idioms section of
MGMAT SC, the book claims that the below usages to be correct/incorrect.
Correct: IT IS EXPECTED THAT the price WILL FALL.
Wrong: IT IS EXPECTED THAT the price SHOULD FALL.
Correct: Matt enjoys intense activities, SUCH AS DRIVING fast cars.
Wrong: Matt enjoys intense activities, SUCH AS TO DRIVE fast cars.
Correct: She drank coffee IN ORDER TO STAY awake.
Wrong: She drank coffee FOR STAYING awake.
Although, I do understand the idiom usage, still need to understand why the wrong options are incorrect gramatically.
Thanks
Hello,
vallabhjadhav, and welcome to the community. I could not agree more with what either of the two earlier members have written. Idioms offer one of those strange cases in which correct
written English follows popular
spoken English from earlier in time, since standardized test question-writers pretty much feel that English was frozen in its usage by around 1950. Is there a reason we can only say
points at if there is physical pointing involved? No, not really. To me, a sentence such as
All the evidence points at his guilt makes just as much sense as the correct version,
All the evidence points to his guilt, but to a grammarian, the former is an abomination. Since there are tens of thousands of idioms in English, you should do your best to take in what you can from the context of a sentence you read or hear and move on.
In the original examples you posted, I will say that the reason behind the first idiom is that an expectation creates a
what condition rather than a
what if, and
will conveys a sense of certainty--namely, about that which is expected--that
should does not. That is, something
is expected, not something
could be expected.
In the second example, you need to deliver on the main clause with a different type of noun, a direct object:
Matt enjoys _____. Subject-verb-direct object. What does Matt enjoy? You cannot fill in the blank with
to drive, since the infinitive form of a verb cannot follow an active verb. Note that you could use the infinitive with a linking verb instead, as in,
To drive is one of Matt's favorite activities. A good way to test these constructs is to see whether you can invert the two parts of the sentence around the linking verb. Here,
One of Matt's favorite activities is to drive is just as valid.
In the final example,
for can be used to modify a noun, as in,
For alertness, she drank coffee (even if I would still prefer an infinitive construct in this particular case), but here, it is modifying an action instead, even if
staying awake could be used as a gerund.
To be clear,
there is nothing grammatically wrong with any of the sentences, but idiomatically, there is another story, and you would have to reach back through time to find the real answers.
Good luck with your studies.
- Andrew