GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

 It is currently 27 Jan 2020, 15:35

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Scientist: Evolutionary biology has long held that the most

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Oct 2011
Posts: 196
Scientist: Evolutionary biology has long held that the most  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 27 Aug 2017, 00:57
2
24
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

63% (02:24) correct 37% (02:41) wrong based on 841 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Scientist: Evolutionary biology has long held that the most attractive males of a species, defined as those with the highest quality physical traits that have no Darwinian survival value, will draw the most female mates. The resulting male offspring will inherit that attractiveness and themselves have more children as a result, thus ensuring widespread dissemination of the grandparents’ genes. Recently, however, scientists have found that the sons of “high quality” male flycatchers failed to inherit the father’s mating status. Further, the most attractive males were so busy mating that they neglected their offspring; as a result, the sons of homelier birds, who took better care of their offspring, had more success at propagating the species.

The two portions in boldface play which of the following roles in the scientist’s argument?

(A) The first is the conclusion of a theory disputed by the scientist; the second is the scientist’s new contention based upon the latest evidence.

(B) The first is a premise of a long-held biological theory; the second is an example of how this theory works.

(C) The first is an explanation of how a biological theory is thought to work; the second is an example of research results that do not support this theory.

(D) The first is an example of a theory that used to be prevalent; the second is the new theory that is now considered predominant by scientists.

(E) The first introduces a long-held theory that the scientist is going to disprove; the second is the scientist’s new theory to replace the one she disproved.

Main CR Qs link - http://gmatclub.com/forum/cr-qs-600-700 ... 31508.html

Originally posted by GetThisDone on 05 May 2012, 22:48.
Last edited by hazelnut on 27 Aug 2017, 00:57, edited 3 times in total.
proper format
Intern
Joined: 16 Feb 2012
Posts: 7
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.44
WE: General Management (Entertainment and Sports)
Re: Scientist: Evolutionary biology has long held that the most  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 May 2012, 23:40
1
I was confused between A and C as well. Ended up picking C primarily because the second statement in bold doesn't sound like a contention/conclusion. I believe that the conclusion is unstated in this argument. Anyways, I looked up online and found this explanation on a random blog, not sure whether this is the OE though.

Quote:
The first two sentences of the argument address the currently-held theory that
certain physical features that serve only to indicate "attractiveness" have
developed in order to help those males distribute their own genes more widely.
For example, a male peacock's plume of tailfeathers does not actively help him to
survive; the theory holds that it helps him to procreate by attracting females. The
first boldface portion explains to us how this theory works.

The final two sentences of the argument introduce information that contradicts
this theory. In this particular species of bird, the homelier birds are better at
passing on their genes than the attractive birds. The second boldface portion
provides an example of the specific research results that contradict the theory.

(A) The first bold statement is not a conclusion; it is an explanation of how the
theory works. The second bold statement is not a contention (or conclusion); it
simply presents new evidence and allows the reader to draw a conclusion.

(B) The two bold statements address opposite sides of the argument, but this
choice says that the second statement supports the theory advanced by the first
statement.

C) CORRECT. The first bold statement explains how the theory is thought to
work and the second bold statement presents research results that contradict this
theory.

(D) Nothing in the argument indicates that the long-held theory discussed in the
first two sentences is not still prevalent. Indeed, the research that contradicts the
theory was only discovered "recently." In addition, the second bold statement
does not introduce a new theory; it simply presents research results that

(E) The scientist does not completely disprove the long-held theory; she merely
presents one piece of data that does not support the theory. In addition, the
second bold statement does not introduce a new theory; it simply presents
research results that contradict the original theory.
Intern
Joined: 10 May 2012
Posts: 34
GMAT Date: 09-10-2012
Re: Scientist: Evolutionary biology has long held that the most  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2012, 03:53
I thought its straight away C. moreover I was down to C because this options says the second part "example" which is true ( "the sons of homelier birds, who took better care of their offspring, had more success at propagating the species" is an example/evidence in support of new finding or in opposition of the first theory).

The statement itself is not a contention rather a fact that scientists noticed and presented as an example.

The first bold face is li'l tricky if its a conclusion or an explanation.
"The resulting male offspring will inherit that attractiveness and themselves have more children as a result" - This statement is again a fact which scientist noticed earlier. And a fact can never be a claim/conclusion, hence it is an explanation (by POE)

HTH
Director
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 685
Re: Scientist: Evolutionary biology has long held that the most  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Aug 2012, 02:44
How long do you spend for this question? I spend more than 3 minutes. 2 minute to understand the argument, 1 minute to analyse answer choices. Finally, I get it wrong.

argument is too complex.
Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2012
Posts: 57
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT Date: 09-30-2012
GPA: 3.08
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Scientist: Evolutionary biology has long held that the most  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2012, 05:38
1
This One is a Clear C Let me tell you why.
IS it said anywhere that the secong part is the conclusion ? or that it is the final argument that scientists have ? Are you sure that Sons of Sexy men dont have much mating option ? No. It never says that.
All it says is ( first part ) a long hend theory. Period ! dont think blah and blah !
Second part An experiment which showed contrary results. It doesnt say that it was the last experiment or that 9999 experiments were considered and all gave this result. 9998 might still have confirmed that sons of sexy men get more mating options.
So second is just an example.
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Jun 2010
Posts: 270
Schools: IE'14, ISB'14, Kellogg'15
WE 1: 7 Yrs in Automobile (Commercial Vehicle industry)
Re: Scientist: Evolutionary biology has long held that the most  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2012, 05:54
I was stuck betw C & E. Finally went with C. Took around 2.14 Mins. The second part in option E is not correct.
Before going to options I just pre thought about the bold faces. 1st one is a general scientific observation and the second one contradicts the 1st one and provides a new situation/explanation.
Then i looked in options to match my pre-thinking. I need to cut the timing.

Any suggestion from experts!!!
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 300
Re: Scientist: Evolutionary biology has long held that the most  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2012, 17:08
3
The first bold-faced sentence is a prediction based on evolutionary biology.

The second bold-faced part, which is based on the results of scientist's research, call into question the prediction of the first bold-faced sentence.

Therefore (C) fits best.

Answer (A) does not work because the second bold-faced part is not 'the scientist's contention.' Rather, the second bold-faced part describes research findings.
_________________
Christopher Lele
Magoosh Test Prep

Current Student
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4310
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: Scientist: Evolutionary biology has long held that the most  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Mar 2015, 19:58
4
The first two sentences of the argument address the currently-held theory that
certain physical features that serve only to indicate "attractiveness" have
developed in order to help those males distribute their own genes more widely.
For example, a male peacock's plume of tailfeathers does not actively help him to
survive; the theory holds that it helps him to procreate by attracting females. The
first boldface portion explains to us how this theory works.
The final two sentences of the argument introduce information that contradicts
this theory. In this particular species of bird, the homelier birds are better at
passing on their genes than the attractive birds. The second boldface portion
provides an example of the specific research results that contradict the theory.

(A) The first bold statement is not a conclusion; it is an explanation of how the
theory works. The second bold statement is not a contention (or conclusion); it
simply presents new evidence and allows the reader to draw a conclusion.

(B) The two bold statements address opposite sides of the argument, but this
choice says that the second statement supports the theory advanced by the first
statement.

(C) CORRECT. The first bold statement explains how the theory is thought to
work and the second bold statement presents research results that contradict this
theory.

(D) Nothing in the argument indicates that the long-held theory discussed in the
first two sentences is not still prevalent. Indeed, the research that contradicts the
theory was only discovered "recently." In addition, the second bold statement
does not introduce a new theory; it simply presents research results that

(E) The scientist does not completely disprove the long-held theory; she merely
presents one piece of data that does not support the theory. In addition, the
second bold statement does not introduce a new theory; it simply presents
research results that contradict the original theory.
_________________
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 8116
Re: Scientist: Evolutionary biology has long held that the most  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Dec 2019, 19:57
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Scientist: Evolutionary biology has long held that the most   [#permalink] 09 Dec 2019, 19:57
Display posts from previous: Sort by