Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
15%
(low)
Question Stats:
75% (01:04) correct
25%
(01:02)
wrong
based on 2453
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that employers should retain all older workers indefinitely or show just cause for dismissal.
(A) that employers should retain all older workers
(B) that all older workers be retained by employers
(C) the retaining by employers of all older workers
(D) employers’ retention of all older workers
(E) employers to retain all older workers
(A) that employers should retain all older workers
(B) that all older workers be retained by employers
(C) the retaining by employers of all older workers
(D) employers’ retention of all older workers
(E) employers to retain all older workers
https://www.nytimes.com/1985/04/14/weekinreview/debate-should-mandatory-retirement-be-outlawed.html
Currently, employers have the option of retaining workers beyond 70 if it is mutually desirable. And, of course, workers can choose to retire before 70, as most do. However, Congress may soon consider a proposal to lift the age 70 retirement cap. The United States Chamber opposes this legislation because it would require employers to retain all older workers indefinitely or show just cause for dismissal.
Currently, employers have the option of retaining workers beyond 70 if it is mutually desirable. And, of course, workers can choose to retire before 70, as most do. However, Congress may soon consider a proposal to lift the age 70 retirement cap. The United States Chamber opposes this legislation because it would require employers to retain all older workers indefinitely or show just cause for dismissal.
30 Aug 2017, 03:20
Kudos
Bookmarks
arvind910619, we don't have to worry about moral obligation here. All the wrong answers are wrong for clear grammatical reasons! Also, we don't need to restrict "should" to moral cases. Consider these: "Anyone who lives in the area should know where the stadium is." "One should expect some side effects during the first week of treatment." "A good theory should create testable predictions."
Anyway . . .
Answer A is wrong because we can't mix "require" with "should." We can't require that someone should do something. We can only require that they actually do it!
B fixed the problem above, correctly applying the command subjunctive ("require that X be done"). However, it creates a huge meaning problem. We're requiring that older workers "be retained . . . or show just cause." It's not the workers who have to show just cause. Yes, there's a shift here from passive to active, but that can be okay if the meaning makes sense. ("He will either leave the room voluntarily or be escorted out by guards.") However, since the meaning is off (the employees must be retained unless the employers can show just cause), this is out. A simple way to sum this up is that we've put our verb with the wrong subject.
C is not parallel at all. It matches a noun with a verb: "requires the retaining . . . or show just cause." This is no good, even if we accept the odd "requires the retaining" at the beginning.
D has the same problem: it tries to make "the retention" parallel to "show."
E finally has good structure. The legislation requires employers to "retain . . . or show."
Anyway . . .
Answer A is wrong because we can't mix "require" with "should." We can't require that someone should do something. We can only require that they actually do it!
B fixed the problem above, correctly applying the command subjunctive ("require that X be done"). However, it creates a huge meaning problem. We're requiring that older workers "be retained . . . or show just cause." It's not the workers who have to show just cause. Yes, there's a shift here from passive to active, but that can be okay if the meaning makes sense. ("He will either leave the room voluntarily or be escorted out by guards.") However, since the meaning is off (the employees must be retained unless the employers can show just cause), this is out. A simple way to sum this up is that we've put our verb with the wrong subject.
C is not parallel at all. It matches a noun with a verb: "requires the retaining . . . or show just cause." This is no good, even if we accept the odd "requires the retaining" at the beginning.
D has the same problem: it tries to make "the retention" parallel to "show."
E finally has good structure. The legislation requires employers to "retain . . . or show."
27 Jun 2010, 00:52
Kudos
Bookmarks
boros2203
the reason B is wrong is because the tense is shifted to passive (i.e. be retained BY employers) and will not match the second part ([to] show just cause for dismissal), which is an active phrase.
