Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 19:00 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 19:00
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
bmwhype2
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Last visit: 08 Mar 2010
Posts: 1,338
Own Kudos:
5,433
 [79]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,338
Kudos: 5,433
 [79]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
73
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,563
 [21]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
 [21]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
10
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
adalfu
Joined: 08 Dec 2009
Last visit: 09 Sep 2012
Posts: 331
Own Kudos:
225
 [5]
Given Kudos: 26
Posts: 331
Kudos: 225
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
b14kumar
Joined: 17 Sep 2005
Last visit: 13 Jan 2013
Posts: 297
Own Kudos:
424
 [5]
Posts: 297
Kudos: 424
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bmwhype2
bmwhype2
633. Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that employers should retain all older workers indefinitely or show just cause for dismissal.
(A) that employers should retain all older workers

(B) that all older workers be retained by employers

(C) the retaining by employers of all older workers

(D) employers’ retention of all older workers

(E) employers to retain all older workers

Why E over B?



Ok, Let's try to complete the sentence using B:

Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that all older workers be retained by employers indefinitely or show just cause for dismissal.

Who has to show the cause for dismisssal??
It's employers. But in above sentence , the clause "show just cause for dismissal" is missing noun.

Now let's try with E.

Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring employers to retain all older workers indefinitely or show just cause for dismissal.

It's clear that who has to show the cause for dismissal.

Hence E should be the answer.

Regards,
Brajesh
User avatar
boros2203
Joined: 07 Feb 2010
Last visit: 21 Sep 2010
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 3
Kudos: 42
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I still have doubt why E is correct and not B. As per the subjunctive definition it should have that +infinitive form of verb without to .

This clearly is satisfied by choice B , any comments ??
User avatar
MHIKER
Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Last visit: 24 May 2021
Posts: 942
Own Kudos:
5,644
 [3]
Given Kudos: 690
Status:No dream is too large, no dreamer is too small
Concentration: Accounting
Posts: 942
Kudos: 5,644
 [3]
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The SC is checking the correct uses of idiom.
Correct idiom relating to require are:
1. requiring to x to y, and
2. requiring that xy
Correct answer is E.
(E) employers to retain all older workers
avatar
vikasi11
Joined: 20 Jan 2015
Last visit: 31 Jan 2020
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
633. Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that employers should retain all older workers indefinitely or show just cause for dismissal.
(A) that employers should retain all older workers
(B) that all older workers be retained by employers
(C) the retaining by employers of all older workers
(D) employers’ retention of all older workers
(E) employers to retain all older workers

Here the non underlined portion contains requiring which is a Verb-ing modifier.
of the format
Clause Verb-ing.
here Verb-ing modifies the closest noun which has to be employers.
hence options DE
D: -ion makes it wakward and wordy
E: correct answer :-D
User avatar
kannu44
Joined: 17 Aug 2012
Last visit: 22 Sep 2021
Posts: 85
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 143
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.75
WE:Consulting (Energy)
Posts: 85
Kudos: 73
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am not able to reject B here , Is is rejected just for being a passing voice . what happened to subjunctive rule.
Thanks mod for your time and help.
User avatar
arvind910619
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 845
Own Kudos:
607
 [1]
Given Kudos: 755
Status:Learning
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
Posts: 845
Kudos: 607
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vksunder
633. Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that employers should retain all older workers indefinitely or show just cause for dismissal.

(A) that employers should retain all older workers
(B) that all older workers be retained by employers
(C) the retaining by employers of all older workers
(D) employers’ retention of all older workers
(E) employers to retain all older workers

The answer is E

In GMAT should is used for moral obligation
Here Laws are mandatory so we have to use infinitive of purpose .
The non underlined part of the sentence is in direct voice so we have to maintain the structure
So E is the best answer
avatar
shiva007
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 23 Jan 2018
Last visit: 30 Jan 2019
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 44
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Technology
GMAT 1: 650 Q44 V35
GPA: 4
Products:
GMAT 1: 650 Q44 V35
Posts: 40
Kudos: 57
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kannu44
I am not able to reject B here , Is is rejected just for being a passing voice . what happened to subjunctive rule.
Thanks mod for your time and help.

hey I have a doubt regarding the use of subjunctive rule.
Is it a rule that the verb present in the sentence should always be in the base form, when there is subjunctive use?
And if it is a rule then option B is wrong because the verb "retained" is not in the base form.
User avatar
Abhishek009
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Last visit: 18 Jul 2025
Posts: 5,937
Own Kudos:
5,327
 [2]
Given Kudos: 463
Status:QA & VA Forum Moderator
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Posts: 5,937
Kudos: 5,327
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shiva007
kannu44
I am not able to reject B here , Is is rejected just for being a passing voice . what happened to subjunctive rule.
Thanks mod for your time and help.

hey I have a doubt regarding the use of subjunctive rule.
Is it a rule that the verb present in the sentence should always be in the base form, when there is subjunctive use?
And if it is a rule then option B is wrong because the verb "retained" is not in the base form.

Subjunctive word (such as demand, suggest, recommend, require, order, mandate) + that + NOUN + BASE FORM of the VERB (e.g., be, go, stop, run, excel) i.e., the infinitive without the to part.
avatar
shiva007
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 23 Jan 2018
Last visit: 30 Jan 2019
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 44
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Technology
GMAT 1: 650 Q44 V35
GPA: 4
Products:
GMAT 1: 650 Q44 V35
Posts: 40
Kudos: 57
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Abhishek009
shiva007
kannu44
I am not able to reject B here , Is is rejected just for being a passing voice . what happened to subjunctive rule.
Thanks mod for your time and help.

hey I have a doubt regarding the use of subjunctive rule.
Is it a rule that the verb present in the sentence should always be in the base form, when there is subjunctive use?
And if it is a rule then option B is wrong because the verb "retained" is not in the base form.

Subjunctive word (such as demand, suggest, recommend, require, order, mandate) + that + NOUN + BASE FORM of the VERB (e.g., be, go, stop, run, excel) i.e., the infinitive without the to part.
So using past tense of the verb is not a correct usage in subjunctive format and hence is incorrect, right? Or is there any other reason ?


Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum
User avatar
tamal99
Joined: 01 Jan 2018
Last visit: 25 Jun 2021
Posts: 124
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 445
Location: India
Schools: IIM (II)
GMAT 1: 640 Q46 V32
GPA: 3.84
Schools: IIM (II)
GMAT 1: 640 Q46 V32
Posts: 124
Kudos: 162
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Experts,
could you please explain why the option E (OA) is not in subjective mood??
Dont we need subjective mood here?

Thanks in advance,
Tamal

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,417
 [3]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,417
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Subjunctive mood requires the verb of the subordinate class to be in the bare infinitive namely "retain" and not with a modal verb 'should'. Therefore it is wrong. Please do not have misconceptions about this. People expect subjunctive mood usage the moment 'that' is used; someone wants subjunctive mood because the sentence uses the main verb such as 'require' or 'propose'. Sometimes people do not even expect a relative clause to follow with a bare infinitive verb.

Why choice A doesn't use a subjunctive structure is anybody's guess.
User avatar
VikasBaloni
Joined: 24 Mar 2020
Last visit: 01 Jun 2024
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 31
Posts: 13
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vikasi11
633. Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that employers should retain all older workers indefinitely or show just cause for dismissal.
(A) that employers should retain all older workers
(B) that all older workers be retained by employers
(C) the retaining by employers of all older workers
(D) employers’ retention of all older workers
(E) employers to retain all older workers

Here the non underlined portion contains requiring which is a Verb-ing modifier.
of the format
Clause Verb-ing.
here Verb-ing modifies the closest noun which has to be employers.
hence options DE
D: -ion makes it wakward and wordy
E: correct answer :-D

Hey VeritasKarishma generis

Is the above line of reasoning correct?

If we go by the above reasoning, then no sentence can be of the form bossy verb-ing + that.

Please correct me if I'm missing something here.

Thank you!
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
76,982
 [3]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,982
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VikasBaloni
vikasi11
633. Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that employers should retain all older workers indefinitely or show just cause for dismissal.
(A) that employers should retain all older workers
(B) that all older workers be retained by employers
(C) the retaining by employers of all older workers
(D) employers’ retention of all older workers
(E) employers to retain all older workers

Here the non underlined portion contains requiring which is a Verb-ing modifier.
of the format
Clause Verb-ing.
here Verb-ing modifies the closest noun which has to be employers.
hence options DE
D: -ion makes it wakward and wordy
E: correct answer :-D

Hey VeritasKarishma generis

Is the above line of reasoning correct?

If we go by the above reasoning, then no sentence can be of the form bossy verb-ing + that.

Please correct me if I'm missing something here.

Thank you!

I do not understand the logic given by the user. Option (A) has a problem that you cannot use "should". You need to use the subjunctive "requiring that employers retain". Note why this is so - when you have already used "requiring", then "should" is pointless. So we say "employers should retain ..." or "... requires that employers retain..."

Option (B) sorts this issue but brings in a new problem:
... legislation requiring that all older workers be retained by employers...
is ok but the rest of the non underlined part says "or show just cause...".
This becomes:

... legislation requiring that all older workers be retained by employers or (all older workers) show just cause...
Not correct. Employers have to show just cause.

Option (C) is a train wreck. We don't even have a subject for "show just cause". Same problem occurs in (D) too.

Option (E) clearly says
... requiring employers to retain all older workers or show just cause ...
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,835
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,835
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts