ng2
Hey. Thanks for the reply. I have another query. Shouldnt 'US revolutionary war rolls' be singular since its a collective entity. like it says in the appositive that it is a collection of records.
Dear
ng2,
My friend, that's a very thoughtful and perceptive question. I'm happy to respond.
You know, my friend, there's an element of language that is inherently illogical. Yes, technically, the term "
U.S. Revolutionary War Rolls" (every word of which should be capitalized) not only denotes a single thing but also is identified by the appositive as another single thing: "
a collection of records." In a purely logically consistent way, we can construct a strong argument about why it
should be singular. Nevertheless, the term is written as a plural, so the default is to treat it grammatically as a plural. That's the rough and ready rule.
The opposite is also true: collective nouns (e.g. "
the company," "
the government," "
the football team," etc.) are composed of many individuals, but because these words are in singular form, they demand singular verbs and singular pronouns.
With exceedingly few exceptions unlikely to be tested on the GMAT, we can say: forget about what would logically make sense--if it looks plural, treat it as plural, and if it looks singular, treat it as singular. You can give yourself bad headaches if you worry about all the ways that the English language is not logically consistent.
Does this make sense?
Mike