It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 13:10

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Sigatoka disease drastically reduces the yield of banana

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 71

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

Sigatoka disease drastically reduces the yield of banana [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 May 2008, 07:42
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:07) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 3 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Sigatoka disease drastically reduces the yield of banana trees and is epidemic throughout the areas of the world where bananas are grown. The fungus that causes the disease can be controlled with fungicides, but the fungicides can pose a health hazard to people living nearby. The fungicides are thus unsuitable for small banana groves in populated areas. Fortunately, most large banana plantations are in locations so isolated that fungicides can be used safely there. Therefore, most of the world’s banana crop is not seriously threatened by Sigatoka disease.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) It will eventually be possible to breed strains of bananas that are resistant to Sigatoka disease.
(B) Large plantations produce most or all of the world’s bananas.
(C) Sigatoka disease spreads more slowly on large plantations than in small banana groves.
(D) Sigatoka disease is the only disease that threatens bananas on a worldwide scale.
(E) Most of the banana trees that have not been exposed to the Sigatoka fungus grow in small banana groves.

Any explanations...thanks...bepositive

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2008
Posts: 130

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

20 May 2008, 08:04
B.

The conclusion is most of the world's banana is not threatened by Sigatoka.
The premise is most large banana plantations can be safely sprayed to prevent Sigatoka.

So the missing assumption is that large banana plantations actually constitutes most of world's bananas.

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 71

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

20 May 2008, 08:08
@zhenmaster

can you please explain each option individually..thanks!!

bepositive

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 30 Aug 2007
Posts: 44

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

20 May 2008, 09:01
I vote for B

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1434

Kudos [?]: 350 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

20 May 2008, 10:59
bepositive wrote:
Sigatoka disease drastically reduces the yield of banana trees and is epidemic throughout the areas of the world where bananas are grown. The fungus that causes the disease can be controlled with fungicides, but the fungicides can pose a health hazard to people living nearby. The fungicides are thus unsuitable for small banana groves in populated areas. Fortunately, most large banana plantations are in locations so isolated that fungicides can be used safely there. Therefore, most of the world’s banana crop is not seriously threatened by Sigatoka disease.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) It will eventually be possible to breed strains of bananas that are resistant to Sigatoka disease.
(B) Large plantations produce most or all of the world’s bananas.
(C) Sigatoka disease spreads more slowly on large plantations than in small banana groves.
(D) Sigatoka disease is the only disease that threatens bananas on a worldwide scale.
(E) Most of the banana trees that have not been exposed to the Sigatoka fungus grow in small banana groves.

Any explanations...thanks...bepositive

B is correct. Because the fungi will only cured large banana plantations (as opposed to small plantations) and if most banana crop comes from large banana plantations, then the produce won't be affected.

A, C, D, E are irrelevant.

Kudos [?]: 350 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 317

Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 4

Location: Washington DC

Show Tags

20 May 2008, 11:15
Straight B. As the conclusion says that most of the banana planatation is not endangered from sigatoka disease. So If we assume that most banana grows in the large planation areas where fugicide can be sprayed the conclusion holds correct.

Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 4

Current Student
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3350

Kudos [?]: 319 [0], given: 2

Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12

Show Tags

20 May 2008, 12:33
why is D wrong?

Kudos [?]: 319 [0], given: 2

Director
Joined: 14 Oct 2007
Posts: 751

Kudos [?]: 232 [0], given: 8

Location: Oxford
Schools: Oxford'10

Show Tags

20 May 2008, 12:45
bepositive wrote:
Sigatoka disease drastically reduces the yield of banana trees and is epidemic throughout the areas of the world where bananas are grown. The fungus that causes the disease can be controlled with fungicides, but the fungicides can pose a health hazard to people living nearby. The fungicides are thus unsuitable for small banana groves in populated areas. Fortunately, most large banana plantations are in locations so isolated that fungicides can be used safely there. Therefore, most of the world’s banana crop is not seriously threatened by Sigatoka disease.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) It will eventually be possible to breed strains of bananas that are resistant to Sigatoka disease. irrelevant/out of scope
(B) Large plantations produce most or all of the world’s bananas. stems says that most large banana plantations are isolated and thus fungicides can be used, AND most of world's banana crop is not threathened. Hence this can be assumed
(C) Sigatoka disease spreads more slowly on large plantations than in small banana groves. irrelevant
(D) Sigatoka disease is the only disease that threatens bananas on a worldwide scale. irrelenvant/out of scope to this argument since other diseases aren't discussed
(E) Most of the banana trees that have not been exposed to the Sigatoka fungus grow in small banana groves. this is not a fair assumption since if a few large plantations can still be "untouched" by Sigatoka disease.

Any explanations...thanks...bepositive

so i go for B.

on a lighter note, i've been to Sigatoka (pronounced Singatoka), which is a nice beachy area of Fiji

Kudos [?]: 232 [0], given: 8

SVP
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1545

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 2

Show Tags

20 May 2008, 18:44
B for sure

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 2

CEO
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2947

Kudos [?]: 667 [0], given: 210

Show Tags

20 May 2008, 22:17
Another vote for B.

Kudos [?]: 667 [0], given: 210

Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2007
Posts: 168

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Location: Vienna, Austria

Show Tags

20 May 2008, 22:56
i concur with freshina - kind of like really D, is it really not the OA?

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1881

Kudos [?]: 1399 [0], given: 1

Schools: CBS, Kellogg

Show Tags

21 May 2008, 00:29
bkk145 wrote:
B is correct. Because the fungi will only cured large banana plantations (as opposed to small plantations) and if most banana crop comes from large banana plantations, then the produce won't be affected.

A, C, D, E are irrelevant

If i got it on the D-day, I will lost the way. This really tricky! The second thougt made me understand the trick of this question.

Thank bepositive!
+1 for you

bkk145 wrote:
most large banana plantations are in locations so isolated that fungicides can be used safely there. Therefore, most of the world’s banana crop is not seriously threatened by Sigatoka disease

_________________

Kudos [?]: 1399 [0], given: 1

CEO
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2947

Kudos [?]: 667 [0], given: 210

Show Tags

25 May 2008, 05:04
OA ?

Kudos [?]: 667 [0], given: 210

Manager
Joined: 22 Dec 2007
Posts: 145

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

25 May 2008, 14:10
straight B.

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 18 Feb 2008
Posts: 786

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 25

Show Tags

25 May 2008, 16:33
B,

only when we assume most of the world's production of bananas are in the large plantations, we can conclude that the world production will not be affected by fungicide.

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 25

Re: CR--Sigatoka disease   [#permalink] 25 May 2008, 16:33
Display posts from previous: Sort by