GMAT Changed on April 16th - Read about the latest changes here

It is currently 24 Apr 2018, 18:08

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Sociologist: Romantics who claim that people are not

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

4 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Jun 2012
Posts: 20
Sociologist: Romantics who claim that people are not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Nov 2013, 03:24
4
This post received
KUDOS
16
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

56% (01:49) correct 44% (01:40) wrong based on 534 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Sociologist: Romantics who claim that people are not born evil but may be made evil by the imperfect institutions that they form cannot be right, for they misunderstand the causal relationshipbetween people and their institutions. After all,institutions are merely collections of people.

Which one of the following principles, if valid, would most help to justify the sociologist’s argument?

(A) People acting together in institutions can do more good or evil than can people acting individually.

(B) Institutions formed by people are inevitably imperfect.

(C) People should not be overly optimistic in their view of individual human beings.

(D) A society’s institutions are the surest gauge of that society’s values.

(E) The whole does not determine the properties of the things that compose it.

Source: LSAT
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

If questions jerk in your mind, then give me a KUDOS

Expert Post
4 KUDOS received
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2013
Posts: 144
Re: Sociologist: Romantics who claim that people are not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Nov 2013, 19:56
4
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
The sociologist is arguing against the idea that institutions cause people to be evil, and his evidence is that institutions are made up of people. Answer choice E supports the sociologist's argument, because if the whole (in this case the institution) DID determine the properties of the things that compose it (the people), then that would support the romantic's point of view (that institutions cause people to become evil). The sociologist is arguing against the romantic, and stating that the whole does NOT determine the characteristics of the parts, so answer choice E helps justify the sociologist's argument.

I hope this helps!!!
_________________

Brandon
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

If you found this post helpful, please give me kudos!!! :)

Save $100 on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting
Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

Expert Post
SVP
SVP
avatar
B
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Posts: 1889
Re: Sociologist: Romantics who claim that people are not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 May 2015, 23:53
Sociologist: Romantics who claim that people are not born evil but may be made evil by the imperfect institutions that they form cannot be right, for they misunderstand the causal relationship between people and their institutions. After all, institutions are merely collections of people.
The conclusion is that people with bad intentions can make an institution imperfect. This is in opposition to the claim that institutions influence individuals.
Which one of the following principles, if valid, would most help to justify the sociologist’s argument?
The correct answer choice will show that individuals affect the institution or negate the idea that the institution affects individuals.
(A) People acting together in institutions can do more good or evil than can people acting individually.
doesn't clarify the causal relationship.
(B) Institutions formed by people are inevitably imperfect.
mentions no causal relationship
(C) People should not be overly optimistic in their view of individual human beings.
out of scope
(D) A society’s institutions are the surest gauge of that society’s values.
out of scope
(E) The whole does not determine the properties of the things that compose it.
The character of the institution is not an indicator of the character of the individuals that form it.
VP
VP
User avatar
D
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1001
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: Sociologist: Romantics who claim that people are not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Dec 2017, 11:30
Sociologist: Romantics who claim that people are not born evil but may be made evil by the imperfect institutions that they form cannot be right, for they misunderstand the causal relationshipbetween people and their institutions. After all,institutions are merely collections of people.

Which one of the following principles, if valid, would most help to justify the sociologist’s argument?

(A) People acting together in institutions can do more good or evil than can people acting individually. -Out of scope

(B) Institutions formed by people are inevitably imperfect. -Imperfect doesn't mean that the people will become evil in an institution

(C) People should not be overly optimistic in their view of individual human beings. -optimistic? out of scope

(D) A society’s institutions are the surest gauge of that society’s values. -This will strengthen romantics' view point

(E) The whole does not determine the properties of the things that compose it. -Correct. This gives a relation between the people and institutions in a way that is opposite to the explanation given by Romantics
_________________

Kudos if my post helps!

Long And A Fruitful Journey - V21 to V41; If I can, So Can You!!


My study resources:
1. Useful Formulae, Concepts and Tricks-Quant
2. e-GMAT's ALL SC Compilation
3. LSAT RC compilation
4. Actual LSAT CR collection by Broal
5. QOTD RC (Carcass)
6. Challange OG RC
7. GMAT Prep Challenge RC

Re: Sociologist: Romantics who claim that people are not   [#permalink] 04 Dec 2017, 11:30
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Sociologist: Romantics who claim that people are not

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.